Re: [openstack-dev] New comer to Openstack.

Hello, Akula, You are welcome to join Tircircle project, please join us if you are interested in it: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tricircle Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Gary Kotton [gkot...@vmware.com] Sent: 11 December 2016 16:17 To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack New Years Resolutions

On 12/12/2016 06:40 PM, Nick Chase wrote: OK, so if you were putting together New Year's Resolutions for OpenStack development for 2017, what would they be? My resolution will be to rewrite Nova in COBOL. Oh wait, no, that's for April 1st, not New Years... Best, -jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Re-defining network templates/isolation

Responses inline... - Original Message - > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Tim Rozet wrote: > > Hello, > > I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create > > new networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for > > a deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Move redis out of Pacemaker

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Michele Baldessari wrote: > Hi Pradeep, > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:51:59PM +0100, Giulio Fidente wrote: > > On 12/09/2016 04:49 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > > >I would like to get some thoughts on $Subject. This came up when i was > >

[openstack-dev] OpenStack New Years Resolutions

OK, so if you were putting together New Year's Resolutions for OpenStack development for 2017, what would they be? -- Nick Chase Editor in Chief, OpenStack:Unlocked __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] lxml gate issues

hi, this is just a headsup, i'm fast approving my own magic[1] to fix gate of the error 'fatal error: libxml/xpath.h: No such file or directory'[2]. some notes: - i don't know why it doesn't affect aodh (so far) even though aodh has the same lxml requirement - there was a new lxml lib release

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 07:58 +0100, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: Hi, I have recently seen that drbdmanage python library is no more GPL2 but need a end user license agreement [1]. Is this compatible with the driver policy of Cinder ? [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][badges][all] Docs gate broken for projects that include README.rst in docs

On 11/12/16 13:32 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 09/12/16 17:20 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, Some docs jobs seem to be broken by the latest (or not?) docutils release. The breakage seems to be related to the latest addition of the bages patch. The docs generation doesn't like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] A question on creating Manila Share

NP, I change the assignee to you, so others will get better knows who is helping on fix it. 2016-12-12 16:56 GMT+08:00 zengchen : > Rabi Mishra & Rico Lin: > Thanks very much for your reply! > I have submitted a bug report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ >

[openstack-dev] [ironic][heat][mistral][magnum] Manage Ironic resource in Orchestration.

Think about bare metal (ironic) deployment, we can do directly ironic call, or use nova to deploy. Right now I have a spec about implemented Ironic resources [1] in Heat. Including Chassis, Port and some state setting feature for Node (including node-set-xxx). In heat team discussion, we tend to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] A question on creating Manila Share

Rabi Mishra & Rico Lin: Thanks very much for your reply! I have submitted a bug report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1649217, and will submit a patch to fix it later. cheers zengchen 在 2016-12-09 12:45:01，"Rabi Mishra" 写道： Hi zengchen, Yeah, the

[openstack-dev] Cannot ping or ssh to floating ip assigned to instance [neutron][floating ip]

Hi all, I have devstack setup which of newton version. (Lab setup) Issue : cannot ping or ssh to floating ip assigned to instance(Security groups are allowed). 172.16.73.0/24 is the external network or lab network. neutron net-list

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

I think video meetings Jeffrey is referring to are just that- quickly as hoc way to resolve some technical dispute or implementation. We did that few times to quickly work out kolla k8s issues. Hangouts are much more efficient way of discussions like that. My take on the issue is that we should

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] No team meeting today - Dec 12th

Dougal, thanks. I’m working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1640378 , hoping to get it done this week. It is now a critical thing to fix. Renat Akhmerov @Nokia > On 12 Dec 2016, at 21:50, Dougal Matthews wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

The issue raised is they violate the 4 opens. From: Michał Jastrzębski Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Monday, December 12, 2016 at 8:09 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] New comer to Openstack.

Hello Akula, Start with http://www.openstack.org/software/start/ Get familiar with Openstack API and Environment/Services. Regards, Yatin On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:39 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, Akula, > > You are welcome to join Tircircle project, please join us if you

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Meeting at 20:00UTC this Wednesday, 14th December

Hi folks, The Horizon team will be having our next meeting at 20:00 UTC this Wednesday, 14th December in #openstack-meeting-3 Meeting agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon If we have spare time this meeting I think we should look into getting some patches reviewed

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

On Dec 13, 2016 8:44 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: I think video meetings Jeffrey is referring to are just that- quickly as hoc way to resolve some technical dispute or implementation. We did that few times to quickly work out kolla k8s issues. Hangouts are much more

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [ceilometer]

The new notification reports kinds of capacity information, includes total, free, allocated, provisioned, visual_free. Detailed info please see the following specs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192542/2/specs/liberty/cinder-capacity-notifications.rst

Re: [openstack-dev] New comer to Openstack.

Hi All Thanks for the inputs. *Thanks and Regards* * Nagaraj R* +919538750652 On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:39 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, Akula, > > You are welcome to join Tircircle project, please join us if you are > interested in it:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] pending review

Hi Sam, Thank you for reporting the bug and trying to fix it. Sorry that you change sit there for such long time. I've left some comment in your patch. On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Sam Morrison wrote: > Hi Cinder devs, > > I’ve had a review [1] waiting for some eyes

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

I do not want to kill the ad hoc video meeting. But we should keep a certain degree of openness. what i would like to see is an invitation in email or irc channel. some agenda which tell others want will be talked. And some decision made in the video meeting should be record in some way. on eth

[openstack-dev] [cinder] pending review

Hi Cinder devs, I’ve had a review [1] waiting for some eyes for over a month now. What’s the process here, usually I get a response to a review in other projects in a day or two. Is there someone I need to alert or add to the review specifically for cinder patches? Thanks, Sam [1]

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] Python3 change in OpenStack CI

As part of the move to run master and stable/newton on Xenial, we disabled testing python 3.4 on these newer branches. Now, for testing we have: * python3.4 on older branches (stable/liberty and stable/mitaka) - on a trusty VM * python3.5 on newer branches (stable/newton, master and future stable

Re: [openstack-dev] Cannot ping or ssh to floating ip assigned to instance [neutron][floating ip]

Have you opened ssh/icmp security groups? From: Shanker Gudipati [mailto:shanker.gudip...@tcs.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 7:24 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] Cannot ping or ssh to floating ip assigned to instance [neutron][floating ip] Hi all, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] how to use mock driver

Elisha, thanks for the explanation. The difference is clear to me now. If I understand it correctly, the regular expression in spec JSON is for information only. It is never compiled into a `re` object. The actual values are generated in `static_info_parsers` from the `mapping`. The regular

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hello, Thanks Yolanda for starting the thread. The list of requirements in the host configuration, related to boot parameters and reboot are: * DPDK - For vfio-pci driver binding, iommu support on kernel args is mandatory, which has to be configured before os-net-config runs * DPDK & RealTime -

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ironic] Need to update kernel parameters on local boot

Hi Saravanan Thanks for your comments. With this new module, I guess a reboot is still needed after os-host-config ? Right now we have been guided by TripleO and Ironic people to start using what in Ironic is called "custom deployment steps". An initial spec is reflected here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][heat][mistral][magnum] Manage Ironic resource in Orchestration.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:18:59PM +0800, Rico Lin wrote: >Think about bare metal (ironic) deployment, we can do directly ironic >call, or use nova to deploy. >Right now I have a spec about implemented Ironic resources [1] in Heat. >Including Chassis, Port and some state setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] how to use mock driver

Hi, · In Vitrage Datasources, we can have a different input format for snapshots and updates. Thus, we need a different JSON file for each. · Also, as part of the Mock feature, we need to support (for each resource) things that will be static, such as it’s name, and things

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][heat][mistral][magnum] Manage Ironic resource in Orchestration.

I think it is a good idea to use OpenStack to manage the steps of 1) and 2). Currently we are using Ansible playbook to implement 1) and 2) and then using Magnum to provision a container COE on baremetals. And it would be better if we use Heat or Mistral to implement the same but if we want to

Re: [openstack-dev] New comer to Openstack.

Gary Kotton wrote: > Welcome aboard. Please see http://www.openstack.org/. A lot of the > projects have developer guidelines. Maybe start there… Also see: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Main_Page for a list of upstream resources. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

It's a soft dependency, like most of the vendor specific dependencies - you only need them if you're using a specific backend. We've loads of them in cinder, under a whole bunch of licenses. There was a summit session discussing it that didn't come to any firm conclusions. On 12 December 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On 2016-12-12 11:52, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: >> I have recently seen that drbdmanage python library is no more GPL2 but >> need a end user license agreement [1]. >> Is this compatible with the driver policy of Cinder ? > > It's not acceptable as a dependency of an OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: > I have recently seen that drbdmanage python library is no more GPL2 but > need a end user license agreement [1]. > Is this compatible with the driver policy of Cinder ? It's not acceptable as a dependency of an OpenStack project (be it GPLv2 or using a custom EULA), see:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptls][tc][goals] community goals for Pike

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > A few months ago, our community started to find and work on > OpenStack-wide goals to "achieve visible common changes, push for > basic levels of consistency and user experience, and efficiently > improve certain areas

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][heat][mistral][magnum] Manage Ironic resource in Orchestration.

Hi all, On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:18:59PM +0800, Rico Lin wrote: > >Think about bare metal (ironic) deployment, we can do directly ironic > >call, or use nova to deploy. > >Right now I have a spec about

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Move redis out of Pacemaker

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > Hey Folks: > > I would like to get some thoughts on $Subject. This came up when i was > discussing the standalone roles for telemetry. Currently when we deploy > redis in tripleo, its a pacemaker managed service. So if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting files from the overcloud from the undercloud

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > So I'm in the process of evaluating options for implementing the > capture-environment-status-and-logs[0] blueprint. At the moment my > current plan is to implement a mistral workflow to execute the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Move redis out of Pacemaker

On 12/09/2016 04:49 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: Hey Folks: I would like to get some thoughts on $Subject. This came up when i was discussing the standalone roles for telemetry. Currently when we deploy redis in tripleo, its a pacemaker managed service. So if we were to deploy telemetry services

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting files from the overcloud from the undercloud

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:54:34PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > So I'm in the process of evaluating options for implementing the > capture-environment-status-and-logs[0] blueprint. At the moment my > current plan is to implement a mistral workflow to execute the > sosreport to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:46:55AM -0600, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > It's a soft dependency, like most of the vendor specific dependencies - you > > only need them if you're using a specific backend. We've loads of them in > > cinder,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +, Duncan Thomas wrote: It's a soft dependency, like most of the vendor specific dependencies - you only need them if you're using a specific backend. We've loads of them in cinder, under a whole bunch of licenses. There was a summit session discussing it

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +, Duncan Thomas wrote: > It's a soft dependency, like most of the vendor specific dependencies - you > only need them if you're using a specific backend. We've loads of them in > cinder, under a whole bunch of licenses. There was a summit session >

[openstack-dev] [mistral] No team meeting today - Dec 12th

Hi all, Todays meeting is cancelled as none of the Mistral team are available to attend. If you have anything you would have liked to discuss please raise it in a reply to this email. As for me, I just have a couple of small patches that need second reviews: https://review.openstack.org/408617

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On 2016-12-12 15:46, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> It's a soft dependency, like most of the vendor specific dependencies - you >> only need them if you're using a specific backend. We've loads of them in >> cinder, under a whole bunch of

[openstack-dev] [Blazar] Meeting Tuesday Dec 13 at 09:00 UTC

Hello everyone, The Blazar team will hold its weekly meeting tomorrow December 13 at 09:00 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting-alt. The agenda is available at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Blazar#Agenda_for_December_13_2016 Feel free to add other agenda items and/or update the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Move redis out of Pacemaker

On 12/12/2016 02:51 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 12/09/2016 04:49 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: Hey Folks: I would like to get some thoughts on $Subject. This came up when i was discussing the standalone roles for telemetry. Currently when we deploy redis in tripleo, its a pacemaker managed

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On 12 December 2016 at 14:55, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > So, what are the steps forward here? Requiring a non-free library like > drbdmanage is not acceptable AFAIU, > This is pretty much where things went dead at the summit - there were various degrees of unacceptability (I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

Hi Tim, thanks a lot for your help. I've seen that there is a failure for "gate-congress-pe-replicated-nv". It's strange because I didn't have failure before. So, what should I do now? Ruben - Messaggio originale - Da: "Tim Hinrichs" A: "Ruben"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

That job is non-voting, which since you're adding a new datasource, you can ignore. Nothing to do now but wait for people to give you reviews. Tim On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:12 PM Ruben wrote: > Hi Tim, > thanks a lot for your help. > I've seen that there is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Re-defining network templates/isolation

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Tim Rozet wrote: > Hello, > I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create new > networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for a > deployment requires creating nic + network environment templates, and >

[openstack-dev] [Zun][Glare][Glance] Building Docker images

Hello to All. I’d like to get initial feedback on the idea of building Docker images through Zun involving Glare as artifactory for all static components required for image. So, the idea here is in being capable to build a Docker image through Zun API with storing all static data required for

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On 12 December 2016 at 16:14, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > Honestly, my opinion is it's just fine as it is, and the fact that this > license has changed doesn't make any difference. > > For most external storage there is _something_ that the deployer needs > to do outside of

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On 12 December 2016 at 16:35, Ash wrote: > I tend to agree with you, Sean. Also, if there's a concern that some > project has changed its license, then just create a fork. In the case of > this previously GPL code, it will at least be re-distributable. In the end, > I

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Re-defining network templates/isolation

Hello, I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create new networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for a deployment requires creating nic + network environment templates, and updating the network isolation resource registry. I think a better

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

John Villalovos wrote: > So how about: > - we enable an #openstack-meeting-5 to instantly relieve scheduling > pressure > > > Any reason it isn't #openstack-meeting-2 ? > > The -2 channel is owned by openstackinfra. Currently we have: #openstack-meeting #openstack-meeting-alt

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:52:50AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: That said, it doesn't seem to be listed as a Cinder requirement right now ? Is it a new dependency being considered, or is it currently flying under the radar ? I think this is because this library is not available on Pypi. --

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On 2016-12-12 16:44:53 + (+), Duncan Thomas wrote: [...] > Having read the Openstack rules linked to earlier in the thread > ( https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/licensing.html ) > we're clearly violating that. [...] Keep in mind that those guidelines were drafted in

[openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

TC ​, ​ Some contributors in kolla have had unscheduled video meetings. This has resulted in complaints about inclusiveness. Some contributors can’t even make the meeting we have, and another scheduled video meeting might produce a situation in which there is no any record of decisions made during

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

Agreed. Just saying that if the software is important to the community, but the distribution/licensing terms are not, there's always a solution. That's all I was trying to get at. If, however, resources don't avail themselves, that can also be indicative that the need vs issue isn't overwhelming.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Move redis out of Pacemaker

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 12/12/2016 02:51 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > >> On 12/09/2016 04:49 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: >> >>> Hey Folks: >>> >>> I would like to get some thoughts on $Subject. This came up when i was >>> discussing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

I tend to agree with you, Sean. Also, if there's a concern that some project has changed its license, then just create a fork. In the case of this previously GPL code, it will at least be re-distributable. In the end, I just don't think this is a huge issue that cannot be easily managed. On Mon,

[openstack-dev] [craton] Meetings for 2016 Dec 19, 2016 Dec 26, and 2017 Jan 2 cancelled

Hi Cratoneers! (Cratonistas? Cratoners? Cratons? I can never remember what name we chose for ourselves...) Most of the team will be taking holiday for some (if not all) of the next two weeks, so we've decided to cancel the meetings scheduled for then. Further, most businesses seem to be observing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/glance failed

  -Original Message- From: Andreas Jaeger Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 12, 2016 at 01:39:17 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:  Re:

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Dev Digest Dec 3-9

Hello Everyone :) HTML Version: http://wp.me/p1eUil-251 Updates: - Nova placement/resource providers update with some discussions on aggregates and API [4] - New Nova core reviewer: Stephen Finucane [8] - Project mascots are all around the mailing list, search for “logo”

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:07:23PM +, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 12 December 2016 at 14:55, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > > > So, what are the steps forward here? Requiring a non-free library like > > drbdmanage is not acceptable AFAIU, > > > > This is pretty much where things

[openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Nova Bugs Team Meeting this Tuesday at 1800 UTC

The next Nova Bugs Team meeting will be Tuesday, December 13 at 1800UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20161213T18 Feel free to add to the meeting agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova/BugsTeam -- Augustina Ragwitz Señora

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron-lbaas] [octavia]vip failed to be plugged in to the amphorae vm

Losnik There are a lot, a lot of retries. I just omit them in email. So how to fix this vip plug error? Thanks Wanjing From: "Kosnik, Lubosz" Date: Friday, December 9, 2016 at 4:38 PM To: "Wanjing Xu (waxu)" Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] About k8s integration

Shubham, Thanks for the inputs. Let’s continue the discussion at the team meeting later today. Best regards, Hongbin From: shubham sharma [mailto:shubham@gmail.com] Sent: December-12-16 12:19 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:58:17AM +0100, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently seen that drbdmanage python library is no more GPL2 but > need a end user license agreement [1]. > > Is this compatible with the driver policy of Cinder ? > > [1] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Network Configuration in TripleO UI

On 12/08/2016 06:05 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been investigating how to implement TripleO network configuration > in TripleO UI. Based on my findings I'd like to propose a solution. > > tl;dr proposal: Slightly refactor Network environment files to match > GUI usage, Use Jinja

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

Hi Ruben, Looked like there were still multiple changes, so I squashed them into 1 and fixed up the requirements.txt file. (You should only need to add the python-magnumclient to the requirements.txt file.) I also abandoned one that was incorporated into the one 1 fix. Here it is. Now the

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Dec 14th kuryr-kubernetes syncup

Hi fellow kuryrs! December 14th at 11:00 UTC we'll be having a video meeting [1] to sync about the current Kubernetes integration. There is an etherpad for the topics that we'll be covering [2]. Feel free to add topics and +1 the topics that you want to have discussion on. The objective of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:16:13AM +0800, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > TC > ​, > ​ > Some contributors in kolla have had unscheduled video meetings. This has > resulted in complaints about inclusiveness. Some contributors can’t even > make > the meeting we have, and another scheduled video meeting might

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are dazzled to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. attach/detach:

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Deep dive session about the UI - January 12

Hi Everyone, On the 12th of January 2017, I'll lead a TripleO deep dive[1] session on how to contribute to the TripleO UI. Hope to see many of you there! [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-deep-dive-topics -- Regards, Ana Krivokapic Senior Software Engineer OpenStack team Red Hat

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > There was a thread in the past discussing renaming -alt to -2 but it > concluded that it was not worth the hassle (losing the 489 people > hanging there). > I was thinking maybe #openstack-meeting-alt could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Move redis out of Pacemaker

Hi Pradeep, On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:51:59PM +0100, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 12/09/2016 04:49 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > >I would like to get some thoughts on $Subject. This came up when i was > >discussing the standalone roles for telemetry. Currently when we deploy > >redis in tripleo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to DNS integration behavior?

On 12/12/2016 19:52, Kimball, Conrad wrote: > We are in the early phases of a project to deploy OpenStack and we face > the question of DNS integration when launching a VM instance. > > > > We have found the DNS Integration documentation at >

[openstack-dev] Changes to DNS integration behavior?

We are in the early phases of a project to deploy OpenStack and we face the question of DNS integration when launching a VM instance. We have found the DNS Integration documentation at http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/config-dns-int.html, but to our understanding it doesn't do

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

On Dec 12, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Some contributors in kolla have had unscheduled video meetings. This has > resulted in complaints about inclusiveness. Some contributors can’t even make > the meeting we have, and another scheduled video meeting might