Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-11 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:56:56PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and we've > been hesitant to invest scarce developer resources in them since we've heard > that the implementation for hierarchical quotas in Cinder has some issues.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Should nova just default to use cinder v3 in Pike?

2017-02-11 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 2/11/2017 11:47 AM, John Griffith wrote: > >> >> It seems like just moving Nova to V3 in Pike would alleviate quite a few >> snarls here. The fact that V3.0 is just pointing back to V2 for Cinder >> calls anyway

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version

2017-02-11 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/11/2017 12:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: So it sounds like we're good to bump the minimum required libvirt to 1.2.9 in Pike which drops support for SLES 12, Ubuntu 14.04, RHEL 7.1 and Oracle 7. We'll bump the minimum required QEMU in Pike to 2.1.0 which in addition to the above distro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version

2017-02-11 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/10/2017 7:28 PM, gustavo panizzo wrote: Debian 9.0 has been frozen, soon it will be released with libvirt 3.0.0 Previous release has 1.2.9 https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libvirt0=names=all=all Also, it is just as important to consider minimum QEMU versions at the same time,

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] Pollsters for Veritas HyperScale

2017-02-11 Thread Nirendra Awasthi
Hi Everyone, Find below details of Ceilometer pollsters for Veritas HyperScale. Please suggest how we can take this forward for merge. Regards, Nirendra -- Overview: * HyperScale pollsters are required to collect and monitor HyperScale storage statistics. * Collected statistics can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-11 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-02-10 11:07:29 -0800: > Fox, Kevin M wrote: > > I'd say kube-dns and designate are very different technologies. > > > > kube-dns is a service discovery mechanism for kubernetes intend to provide > > internal k8s resolution. The fact it uses dns to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Should nova just default to use cinder v3 in Pike?

2017-02-11 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > While talking about [1] yesterday and trying to figure out how to > configure nova to use cinder v3 in the CI jobs in Pike, things got a bit > messy from the CI job configuration perspective. > > My initial plan was to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Should nova just default to use cinder v3 in Pike?

2017-02-11 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/11/2017 11:47 AM, John Griffith wrote: It seems like just moving Nova to V3 in Pike would alleviate quite a few snarls here. The fact that V3.0 is just pointing back to V2 for Cinder calls anyway I'm uncertain there's a huge downside to this. Nova + Cinder V2 coverage is only an entry

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-11 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:22 PM Hayes, Graham wrote: > The HTML version of this is here: > http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ > > I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate > project?", "How is Designate getting