On 02/24/2015 03:09 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 22/02/15 22:43 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 02/18/2015 06:37 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Thanks for your comment, Miguel. Your suggestion is indeed very close
to the RESTful ideal.
However, I have a question for the entire API-WG. Our (proposed)
m
On 02/18/2015 06:37 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Thanks for your comment, Miguel. Your suggestion is indeed very close
to the RESTful ideal.
However, I have a question for the entire API-WG. Our (proposed)
mission is "To improve the developer experience of API users by
converging the OpenStack AP
Thanks for your comment, Miguel. Your suggestion is indeed very close to the
RESTful ideal.
However, I have a question for the entire API-WG. Our (proposed) mission is
"To improve the developer experience of API users by converging the OpenStack
API to a consistent and pragmatic RESTful desig
Out of all the proposals mentioned in this thread, I think Jay's (d) option
is what is closer to the REST ideal:
d) POST /images/{image_id}/tasks with payload:
{ "action": "deactivate|activate" }
Even though I don't think this is the perfect solution, I can recognize
that at least it tries to
On 2/15/15, 2:35 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 02/15/2015 01:13 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>> On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG
meeting [1] concerning "functional" API
On 02/15/2015 01:13 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG
meeting [1] concerning "functional" API in Glance [2]. We made
some progress, but need to close
On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>> This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
>> [1] concerning "functional" API in Glance [2]. We made some progress,
>>but
>> need to close this off so the spec can be implement
On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning "functional" API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but
need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo.
I believe this is where we left off:
1.
On 15/02/15 06:31 +, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning "functional" API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but
need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo.
I believe this is where we left off:
1.
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning "functional" API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but
need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo.
I believe this is where we left off:
1. The general consensus was that POST is the corre
10 matches
Mail list logo
