: Dmitry Tantsur [mailto:dtant...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:20 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] disambiguating the term "discovery"
On 11/12/2014 10:47 PM, Victor Lowther wrote:
Hmmm... with this thread in mind, anyone
dtant...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:20 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] disambiguating the term "discovery"
>
> On 11/12/2014 10:47 PM, Victor Lowther wrote:
>> Hmmm... with this thread in mind, anyon
-level-node-discovery
Thanks,
Sandhya.
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Tantsur [mailto:dtant...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:20 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] disambiguating the term "discovery"
On 11/12/201
On 11/12/2014 10:47 PM, Victor Lowther wrote:
Hmmm... with this thread in mind, anyone think that changing DISCOVERING
to INTROSPECTING in the new state machine spec is a good idea?
As before I'm uncertain. Discovery is a troublesome term, but too many
people use and recognize it, while IMO intr
Just for reference, the spec is this one:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133828/
That's a good point, I think it's important to have this distinction
of a new node being discovered and a registered node being
introspected/interrogated. So I'm +1 for the idea.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Vi
Hmmm... with this thread in mind, anyone think that changing DISCOVERING to
INTROSPECTING in the new state machine spec is a good idea?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Ganapathy, Sandhya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the mail thread on disambiguating the term 'discovery' -
>
> In the lines of w
Hi all,
Following the mail thread on disambiguating the term 'discovery' -
In the lines of what Devananda had stated, Hardware Introspection also means
retrieving and storing hardware details of the node whose credentials and IP
Address are known to the system. (Correct me if I am wrong).
I a
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Stuart Fox wrote:
> Having written/worked on a few DC automation tools, Ive typically broken
> down the process of getting unknown hardware into production in to 4
> distinct stages.
> 1) Discovery (The discovery of unknown hardware)
> 2) Normalising (Push initial
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Adam Lawson wrote:
> I fully and wholeheartedly agree that inventory management is out of scope
> of Ironic. But I have a small suggestion:
>
> We'd do well as a community to adopt/evangelize an informal rule which I
> enforce at work (because I see this happen a
I fully and wholeheartedly agree that inventory management is out of scope
of Ironic. But I have a small suggestion:
We'd do well as a community to adopt/evangelize an informal rule which I
enforce at work (because I see this happen a lot when brainstorming with
cross-project goals); we cannot say
Having written/worked on a few DC automation tools, Ive typically broken
down the process of getting unknown hardware into production in to 4
distinct stages.
1) Discovery (The discovery of unknown hardware)
2) Normalising (Push initial configs like drac/imm/ilo settings, flashing
to known good fir
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Sam Betts (sambetts)
wrote:
> I agree with Devananda's definition of Œhardware discovery¹ and other
> tools similar to Ironic use the term discovery in this way, however I have
> found that these other tools often bundle the gathering of the system
> properties to
I agree with Devananda's definition of Œhardware discovery¹ and other
tools similar to Ironic use the term discovery in this way, however I have
found that these other tools often bundle the gathering of the system
properties together with the discovery of the hardware as a single step
from a user
+1 for the separation
I already gave up of the term "discovery" as you can see on the DRAC
Hardware Introspection[1] spec, I also don't think that
"introspection" is the best word for that (we already use the world
"cloud" for OpenStack so it can't get more confusing than that).
Perhaps "interroga
On 10/21/2014 02:11 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
I was reminded in the Ironic meeting today that the words "hardware
discovery" are overloaded and used in different ways by different
people. Since this is something we are going to talk about at the
summit (again), I'd like to start
On 10/20/2014 07:11 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was reminded in the Ironic meeting today that the words "hardware
> discovery" are overloaded and used in different ways by different
> people. Since this is something we are going to talk about at the
> summit (again), I'd like
16 matches
Mail list logo
