Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-19 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/14/2014 12:35 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/13/2014 06:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:05 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-14 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:52:05 -0400 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/13/2014 06:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/13/2014 06:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:05 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:05:27PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a Grease Monkey script to purge all the 3rd Party CI content out of Jenkins UI. People

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread James E. Blair
cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a Grease Monkey script to purge all the 3rd Party CI content out of Jenkins UI. People are writing mail filters to dump all the notifications. Dan Berange

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Dan Smith
You may have noticed that this has merged, along with a further change that shows the latest results in a table format. (You may need to force-reload in your browser to see the change.) Friggin. Awesome. Thanks again to Radoslav Gerganov for writing the original change. Thanks to all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread James E. Blair
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com writes: You may have noticed that this has merged, along with a further change that shows the latest results in a table format. (You may need to force-reload in your browser to see the change.) Friggin. Awesome. Thanks again to Radoslav Gerganov for writing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: You may have noticed that this has merged, along with a further change that shows the latest results in a table format. (You may need to force-reload in your browser to see the change.) Very cool!! this is really

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:05 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a Grease Monkey script to purge all the 3rd Party CI content out of Jenkins UI. People are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread James E. Blair
Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com writes: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: You may have noticed that this has merged, along with a further change that shows the latest results in a table format. (You may need to force-reload in your browser to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/13/2014 06:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:05 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a Grease Monkey script to purge all the 3rd Party

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:27 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: If it is not worth looking at a job that is run by the OpenStack CI system, please propose a patch to openstack-infra/config to delete it from the Zuul config. We only want to run what's useful, and we have other

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/13/2014 06:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/13/2014 06:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:05 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-13 Thread James E. Blair
Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com writes: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:27 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: If it is not worth looking at a job that is run by the OpenStack CI system, please propose a patch to openstack-infra/config to delete it from the Zuul config. We only

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 2 July 2014 16:11, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Hmmm, my first response - given that long chew we had on the ml[0] about the use of the word certified as well as the short confirmation we had in the tc meeting[1] that the word certified would not be used, but rather some version

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-04 Thread Anita Kuno
On 07/04/2014 08:11 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 2 July 2014 16:11, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Hmmm, my first response - given that long chew we had on the ml[0] about the use of the word certified as well as the short confirmation we had in the tc meeting[1] that the word certified

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-02 Thread Anita Kuno
-gate.yaml -Original Message- From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 7:03 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit On 1 July 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-02 Thread Anita Kuno
On 07/01/2014 10:03 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 1 July 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 07/01/2014 05:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: For the record, cinder gave a very clear definition of success in our 3rd party guidelines: Passes every test in tempest-dsm-full. If that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 30 June 2014 16:49, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Right now that dashboard introduces more confusion than it alleviates since the definition of success in regards to third party ci systems has yet to be defined by the community. For the record, cinder gave a very clear definition

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-01 Thread Anita Kuno
On 07/01/2014 05:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 30 June 2014 16:49, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Right now that dashboard introduces more confusion than it alleviates since the definition of success in regards to third party ci systems has yet to be defined by the community. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 1 July 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 07/01/2014 05:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: For the record, cinder gave a very clear definition of success in our 3rd party guidelines: Passes every test in tempest-dsm-full. If that needs documenting somewhere else, please let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-01 Thread Asselin, Ramy
: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit On 1 July 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 07/01/2014 05:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: For the record, cinder gave a very clear definition of success in our 3rd party guidelines: Passes every test in tempest-dsm-full

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 08:26:44AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/27/2014 7:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/29/2014 09:39 AM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: On 6/28/14 10:40 AM, James E. Blair wrote: An alternate approach would be to have third-party CI systems register jobs with OpenStack's Zuul rather than using their own account. This would mean only a single report of all jobs (upstream and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread James E. Blair
Joshua Hesketh joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com writes: On 6/28/14 10:40 AM, James E. Blair wrote: An alternate approach would be to have third-party CI systems register jobs with OpenStack's Zuul rather than using their own account. This would mean only a single report of all jobs (upstream and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Kurt Taylor
Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote on 06/27/2014 12:33:48 PM: What if 3rd Party CI didn't vote in Gerrit? What if it instead published to some 3rd party test reporting site (a thing that doesn't yet exist). Gerrit has the facility so that we could inject the dashboard content for this in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Kurt Taylor
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote on 06/30/2014 06:03:50 AM: From: Sean Dague s...@dague.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 06/30/2014 06:09 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Ilya Shakhat
2014-06-30 19:17 GMT+04:00 Kurt Taylor krtay...@us.ibm.com: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote on 06/27/2014 12:33:48 PM: If it really does show up right in Gerrit as if it were integrated, then that would be fine with me. I think the biggest problem we have right now is that a lot of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Anita Kuno
On 06/30/2014 11:41 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: 2014-06-30 19:17 GMT+04:00 Kurt Taylor krtay...@us.ibm.com: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote on 06/27/2014 12:33:48 PM: If it really does show up right in Gerrit as if it were integrated, then that would be fine with me. I think the biggest

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-30 Thread Dan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There is a similar old bug for that, with a good suggestion for how it could possibly be done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1251758 This isn't what I'm talking about. What we need is, for each new patchset on a given change, an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-29 Thread Joshua Hesketh
On 6/28/14 10:40 AM, James E. Blair wrote: An alternate approach would be to have third-party CI systems register jobs with OpenStack's Zuul rather than using their own account. This would mean only a single report of all jobs (upstream and 3rd-party) per-patchset. It significantly reduces

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-28 Thread James E. Blair
Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes: I would be good with Jenkins not reporting on a successful run, or if rather than a comment from Jenkins the vote in the table had a link to the test results, so if you get a -1 from Jenkins you can follow the link from the -1 in the table

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 27/06/14 07:40 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a lot of 3rd Party CI systems, the Gerrit UI is really not great for this. A couple of things have fallen out of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a lot of 3rd Party CI systems, the Gerrit UI is really not great for this. That's an understatement

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a lot of 3rd

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Dan Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What if 3rd Party CI didn't vote in Gerrit? What if it instead published to some 3rd party test reporting site (a thing that doesn't yet exist). Gerrit has the facility so that we could inject the dashboard content for this in Gerrit in a little

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Zaro
Sean, there is a proposal[1] in upstream gerrit to fix this issue. David's proposal is to make Gerrit handle multiple notifications channels per project which would allow us to treat bot notifications differently than human notifications. He has the same problem as we do, most of his builds are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/27/2014 02:19 PM, Zaro wrote: Sean, there is a proposal[1] in upstream gerrit to fix this issue. David's proposal is to make Gerrit handle multiple notifications channels per project which would allow us to treat bot notifications differently than human notifications. He has the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Zaro
David did suggest adding REST api endpoints to get data for each channel so it doesn't necessarily require you to even use the gerrit web ui. However the web UI's old screen is pretty much dead so I assume the presentation would only be available in new change screen. I know Openstackers have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread Sean Dague
I do quite like the conflicts with part, I was thinking about that the other day. That would be hugely useful. -Sean On 06/27/2014 02:56 PM, Zaro wrote: David did suggest adding REST api endpoints to get data for each channel so it doesn't necessarily require you to even use the gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread James E. Blair
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: It seems what we actually want is a dashboard of these results. We want them available when we go to Gerrit, but we don't want them in Gerrit itself. I agree with most of what you wrote, particularly that we want them available in Gerrit and with a sensible