Thomas Goirand wrote:
Anyway, since it seems there's a consensus on this:
happybase=0.5,!=0.7
that's what I did here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82438/
Please approve it.
The currently-proposed patch has happybase=0.5,!=0.6,!=0.7, so now
I'm confused. Since I think you updated
Sean,
The problem with 0.4 is a very new one. We had critical bug that was fixed
by ConnectionPool usage. This feature is available since 0.5. So we had two
options: 1. Go to rc1 with critical bug (not supported HBase in fact) 2.
Fix it but have incorrect dependency on 0.4. And we've chosen option
On 03/29/2014 01:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far
as I know
Thomas Goirand wrote:
I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze
exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone, agree! :) ), then
would =0.8 or =0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 be better?
At this point I think it's safest to go with =0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7, *if*
Ceilometer folks confirm that
Hi folks,
Running rests against 0.8. Will update you ASAP
Thanks,
Nadya
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze
exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone,
Today I've tested 0.6 and 0.8. They are acceptable for us. But 0.4 is not.
So I'd like to support Thomas's suggestion about freeze exception for
happybase.
Thanks, Nadya
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi folks,
Running rests against 0.8. Will
Given that some RCs have already shipped, I feel like the ship has
sailed here, because projects already have branches outside of master
with the requirements files they are going to have for icehouse, and the
normal auto propose requirements doesn't work here.
So I'm -0 on this for icehouse.
Sean, happybase is used only in Ceilometer.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Given that some RCs have already shipped, I feel like the ship has
sailed here, because projects already have branches outside of master
with the requirements files they are going to
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
OK so I would be fine with happybase=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 as
On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
OK so I
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
OK so I would be fine with happybase=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 as it allows 0.8
to be run
Sean, please see my comment in bug regarding 0.7. Unfortunately I have
nothing to suggest here. If distributive contains only 0.7 we cannot work
with HBase through happybase. And I don't see any solutions.
But anyway if you change requirements for happybase (I guess we need to get
0.7 back, no?)
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
--
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker
// http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP
So how did Ceilometer get into this situation? Because the ceilometer
requirements are happybase=0.4,=0.6
So we told distributions at Feature Freeze that was adequate version for
ceilometer, and now we're telling them it's not at RC. And that's
honestly too late for most of them.
So I remain -1
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
So how did Ceilometer get into this situation? Because the ceilometer
requirements are happybase=0.4,=0.6
Is this a case where testing minimums might have helped?
-Jim
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
15 matches
Mail list logo
