Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-09-03 Thread masoom alam
Hi Ajay,

We are testing the same scenario that you are working one, but getting the
follow error:

http://paste.openstack.org/show/105029/

Could you be of any help here?

Thanks




On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) akala...@cisco.com
 wrote:

  Hi Guys
 For the throughput tests I need to be able to install iperf on the cloud
 image. For this DNS server needs to be set. But the current network context
 should also support DNS name server setting
 Should we add that into network context?
 Ajay



   From: Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me

 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM

 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Cc: Harshil Shah (harsshah) harss...@cisco.com
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

   Timur,

  Thanks for pointing Ajay.

  Ajay,

   Also I cannot see this failure unless I run rally with –v –d object.


  Actually rally is sotring information about all failures. To get
 information about them you can run next command:

  *rally task results --pprint*

  It will display all information about all iterations (including
 exceptions)


   Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
 network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results


  Because, bad results are better then nothing...


  Best regards,
 Boris Pavlovic


 On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Timur Nurlygayanov 
 tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com wrote:

   Hi Ajay,

  looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron
 Networks during the benchmarks execution.
  We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext
 implementation:
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306

  could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300
 and run your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will
 be automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the
 ability to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following
 part to your task JSON to enable Neutron context:
 ...
 context: {
 ...
 neutron_network: {
 network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,
 }
 }
 ...

  Hope this will help.



  On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
 akala...@cisco.com wrote:

   Hi
 I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This
 scenario has the following code
   def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
script, interpreter, username,
fixed_network=private,
floating_network=public,
ip_version=4, port=22,
use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
server = None
 floating_ip = None
 try:
 print fixed network:%s floating network:%s
 %(fixed_network,floating_network)
 server = self._boot_server(
 self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
 image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

  *self.check_network(server, fixed_network)*

  The question I have is the instance is created with a call to
 boot_server but no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step
 it goes and checks if the fixed network is attached to the instance and
 sure enough it fails
 At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I
 run rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario
 numbers in a table with no errors when I run with
 rally task start boot-and-delete.json

  And reports results. First what am I missing in this case. Thing is I
 am using neutron not nova-network
 Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
 network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results

  Ajay


  ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




 --

  Timur,
 QA Engineer
 OpenStack Projects
 Mirantis Inc

 [image: http://www.openstacksv.com/] http://www.openstacksv.com/

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-09-03 Thread Ajay Kalambur (akalambu)
The reason this is failing is you are specifying a fixed network and at the 
same time asking for a new network to be created using context. What happens is 
the VM gets attached to your fixed network instead of the created Rally network
So you need to modify vm_tasks.py for this case and basically if not fixed and 
using floating ip just skip the network check and the fixed ip code and just 
directly use floating ip to access.
I think some changes are needed to vm_tasks.py to make it work for both fixed 
and floating and support for network context


If you need a local change I can pass along a local change for vm_tasks.py that 
only support floating ip. Let me know do you have floating ips available ?
Ajay


From: masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.commailto:masoom.a...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 11:12 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

Hi Ajay,

We are testing the same scenario that you are working one, but getting the 
follow error:

http://paste.openstack.org/show/105029/

Could you be of any help here?

Thanks




On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
akala...@cisco.commailto:akala...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Guys
For the throughput tests I need to be able to install iperf on the cloud image. 
For this DNS server needs to be set. But the current network context should 
also support DNS name server setting
Should we add that into network context?
Ajay



From: Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.memailto:bo...@pavlovic.me

Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Harshil Shah (harsshah) harss...@cisco.commailto:harss...@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

Timur,

Thanks for pointing Ajay.

Ajay,

 Also I cannot see this failure unless I run rally with –v –d object.

Actually rally is sotring information about all failures. To get information 
about them you can run next command:

rally task results --pprint

It will display all information about all iterations (including exceptions)


Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to network, 
ssh and run command why bother reporting the results

Because, bad results are better then nothing...


Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic


On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Timur Nurlygayanov 
tnurlygaya...@mirantis.commailto:tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi Ajay,

looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron Networks 
during the benchmarks execution.
We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext 
implementation:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306

could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300 and run 
your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will be 
automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the ability 
to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following part to your 
task JSON to enable Neutron context:
...
context: {
...
neutron_network: {
network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,
}
}
...

Hope this will help.



On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
akala...@cisco.commailto:akala...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This scenario has 
the following code
 def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
   script, interpreter, username,
   fixed_network=private,
   floating_network=public,
   ip_version=4, port=22,
   use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
  server = None
floating_ip = None
try:
print fixed network:%s floating network:%s 
%(fixed_network,floating_network)
server = self._boot_server(
self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

self.check_network(server, fixed_network)

The question I have is the instance is created with a call to boot_server but 
no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step it goes and checks 
if the fixed network is attached to the instance and sure enough it fails
At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I run 
rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario numbers in a 
table

Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-09-03 Thread masoom alam
Please pass on your VMTasks.py. Further, floating ips are available.

Thanks for the help!


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) akala...@cisco.com
 wrote:

  The reason this is failing is you are specifying a fixed network and at
 the same time asking for a new network to be created using context. What
 happens is the VM gets attached to your fixed network instead of the
 created Rally network
 So you need to modify vm_tasks.py for this case and basically if not fixed
 and using floating ip just skip the network check and the fixed ip code and
 just directly use floating ip to access.
 I think some changes are needed to vm_tasks.py to make it work for both
 fixed and floating and support for network context


  If you need a local change I can pass along a local change for
 vm_tasks.py that only support floating ip. Let me know do you have floating
 ips available ?
 Ajay


   From: masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com

 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 11:12 PM

 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

   Hi Ajay,

  We are testing the same scenario that you are working one, but getting
 the follow error:

  http://paste.openstack.org/show/105029/

  Could you be of any help here?

  Thanks




 On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
 akala...@cisco.com wrote:

  Hi Guys
 For the throughput tests I need to be able to install iperf on the cloud
 image. For this DNS server needs to be set. But the current network context
 should also support DNS name server setting
 Should we add that into network context?
 Ajay



   From: Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me

 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
  Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM

 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Cc: Harshil Shah (harsshah) harss...@cisco.com
 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

   Timur,

  Thanks for pointing Ajay.

  Ajay,

   Also I cannot see this failure unless I run rally with –v –d object.


  Actually rally is sotring information about all failures. To get
 information about them you can run next command:

  *rally task results --pprint*

  It will display all information about all iterations (including
 exceptions)


   Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
 network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results


  Because, bad results are better then nothing...


  Best regards,
 Boris Pavlovic


 On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Timur Nurlygayanov 
 tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com wrote:

   Hi Ajay,

  looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron
 Networks during the benchmarks execution.
  We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext
 implementation:
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306

  could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300
 and run your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will
 be automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the
 ability to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following
 part to your task JSON to enable Neutron context:
 ...
 context: {
 ...
 neutron_network: {
 network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,
 }
 }
 ...

  Hope this will help.



  On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
 akala...@cisco.com wrote:

   Hi
 I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This
 scenario has the following code
   def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
script, interpreter, username,
fixed_network=private,
floating_network=public,
ip_version=4, port=22,
use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
server = None
 floating_ip = None
 try:
 print fixed network:%s floating network:%s
 %(fixed_network,floating_network)
 server = self._boot_server(
 self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
 image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

  *self.check_network(server, fixed_network)*

  The question I have is the instance is created with a call to
 boot_server but no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step
 it goes and checks if the fixed network is attached to the instance and
 sure enough it fails
 At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless
 I run rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario
 numbers in a table with no errors when I

Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-09-03 Thread Harshil Shah (harsshah)
Hello Timur,

I have one question, so I am testing rally boot and delete scenario, it seems 
to work fine when tenant is 1 and user is 1. Although if I change tenant to 2 
and users 2, I see below error. Any idea why this can happen ?

=

2014-09-03 10:51:18.138 17441 CRITICAL rally [-] ServiceUnavailable: Unable to 
create the network. No tenant network is available for allocation.

cat boot-runcommand-delete.json

{

VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete: [

{

args: {

flavor: {

name: m1.small

},

image: {

name: Ubuntu Server 14.04

},

fixed_network: net04,

floating_network: net04_ext,

use_floatingip: true,

script: doc/samples/tasks/support/instance_dd_test.sh,

interpreter: /bin/sh,

username: ubuntu

},

runner: {

type: constant,

times: 10,

concurrency: 2

},

context: {

neutron_network: {

network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,

},

users: {

tenants: 2, == Works with this value being 1

users_per_tenant: 2

}

}

}

]

}

==

Thanks,
Harshil

From: Timur Nurlygayanov 
tnurlygaya...@mirantis.commailto:tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com
Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 at 1:54 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Harshil Shah harss...@cisco.commailto:harss...@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

Hi Ajay,

looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron Networks 
during the benchmarks execution.
We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext 
implementation:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306

could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300 and run 
your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will be 
automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the ability 
to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following part to your 
task JSON to enable Neutron context:
...
context: {
...
neutron_network: {
network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,
}
}
...

Hope this will help.



On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
akala...@cisco.commailto:akala...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This scenario has 
the following code
 def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
   script, interpreter, username,
   fixed_network=private,
   floating_network=public,
   ip_version=4, port=22,
   use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
  server = None
floating_ip = None
try:
print fixed network:%s floating network:%s 
%(fixed_network,floating_network)
server = self._boot_server(
self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

self.check_network(server, fixed_network)

The question I have is the instance is created with a call to boot_server but 
no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step it goes and checks 
if the fixed network is attached to the instance and sure enough it fails
At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I run 
rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario numbers in a 
table with no errors when I run with
rally task start boot-and-delete.json

And reports results. First what am I missing in this case. Thing is I am using 
neutron not nova-network
Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to network, 
ssh and run command why bother reporting the results

Ajay


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--

Timur,
QA Engineer
OpenStack Projects
Mirantis Inc

[http://www.openstacksv.com/]http://www.openstacksv.com/
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-09-01 Thread masoom alam
How you solved this issue of syntax error. We are getting the same error:

# rally -v task start rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand-
delete.json
Command failed, please check log for more info
2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 CRITICAL rally [-] ParserError: while parsing
a flow mapping
  in string, line 23, column 24:
context: {
   ^
expected ',' or '}', but got 'scalar'
  in string, line 28, column 18:
 neutron_network: {
 ^
2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 TRACE rally Traceback (most recent call last):
2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 TRACE rally   File /usr/local/bin/rally,
line 10, in 

Any clue?

Thanks


On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
akala...@cisco.com wrote:

  Hi
 I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This
 scenario has the following code
   def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
script, interpreter, username,
fixed_network=private,
floating_network=public,
ip_version=4, port=22,
use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
server = None
 floating_ip = None
 try:
 print fixed network:%s floating network:%s
 %(fixed_network,floating_network)
 server = self._boot_server(
 self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
 image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

  *self.check_network(server, fixed_network)*

  The question I have is the instance is created with a call to
 boot_server but no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step
 it goes and checks if the fixed network is attached to the instance and
 sure enough it fails
 At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I
 run rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario
 numbers in a table with no errors when I run with
 rally task start boot-and-delete.json

  And reports results. First what am I missing in this case. Thing is I am
 using neutron not nova-network
 Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
 network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results

  Ajay


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-08-29 Thread Timur Nurlygayanov
Hi Ajay,

looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron
Networks during the benchmarks execution.
We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext
implementation:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306

could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300 and
run your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will be
automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the
ability to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following
part to your task JSON to enable Neutron context:
...
context: {
...
neutron_network: {
network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,
}
}
...

Hope this will help.



On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
akala...@cisco.com wrote:

  Hi
 I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This
 scenario has the following code
   def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
script, interpreter, username,
fixed_network=private,
floating_network=public,
ip_version=4, port=22,
use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
server = None
 floating_ip = None
 try:
 print fixed network:%s floating network:%s
 %(fixed_network,floating_network)
 server = self._boot_server(
 self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
 image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

  *self.check_network(server, fixed_network)*

  The question I have is the instance is created with a call to
 boot_server but no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step
 it goes and checks if the fixed network is attached to the instance and
 sure enough it fails
 At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I
 run rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario
 numbers in a table with no errors when I run with
 rally task start boot-and-delete.json

  And reports results. First what am I missing in this case. Thing is I am
 using neutron not nova-network
 Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to
 network, ssh and run command why bother reporting the results

  Ajay


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 

Timur,
QA Engineer
OpenStack Projects
Mirantis Inc

[image: http://www.openstacksv.com/] http://www.openstacksv.com/
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-08-29 Thread Ajay Kalambur (akalambu)
Hi Timur
With this I was able to create networks and attach VM to those networks. Would 
I now be able to ssh to this and run command what I am looking for is a 
unification of boot-runcommand-delete and this neutron_network so create 
network attach to router associate floating ip and ssh to it
Ajay


From: Timur Nurlygayanov 
tnurlygaya...@mirantis.commailto:tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 at 1:54 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Harshil Shah (harsshah) harss...@cisco.commailto:harss...@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

Hi Ajay,

looks like you need to use NeutronContext feature to configure Neutron Networks 
during the benchmarks execution.
We now working on merge of two different comits with NeutronContext 
implementation:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300  and 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306

could you please apply commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96300 and run 
your benchmarks? Neutron Network with subnetworks and routers will be 
automatically created for each created tenant and you should have the ability 
to connect to VMs. Please, note, that you should add the following part to your 
task JSON to enable Neutron context:
...
context: {
...
neutron_network: {
network_cidr: 10.%s.0.0/16,
}
}
...

Hope this will help.



On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Ajay Kalambur (akalambu) 
akala...@cisco.commailto:akala...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi
I am trying to run the Rally scenario boot-runcommand-delete. This scenario has 
the following code
 def boot_runcommand_delete(self, image, flavor,
   script, interpreter, username,
   fixed_network=private,
   floating_network=public,
   ip_version=4, port=22,
   use_floatingip=True, **kwargs):
  server = None
floating_ip = None
try:
print fixed network:%s floating network:%s 
%(fixed_network,floating_network)
server = self._boot_server(
self._generate_random_name(rally_novaserver_),
image, flavor, key_name='rally_ssh_key', **kwargs)

self.check_network(server, fixed_network)

The question I have is the instance is created with a call to boot_server but 
no networks are attached to this server instance. Next step it goes and checks 
if the fixed network is attached to the instance and sure enough it fails
At the step highlighted in bold. Also I cannot see this failure unless I run 
rally with –v –d object. So it actually reports benchmark scenario numbers in a 
table with no errors when I run with
rally task start boot-and-delete.json

And reports results. First what am I missing in this case. Thing is I am using 
neutron not nova-network
Second when most of the steps in the scenario failed like attaching to network, 
ssh and run command why bother reporting the results

Ajay


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--

Timur,
QA Engineer
OpenStack Projects
Mirantis Inc

[http://www.openstacksv.com/]http://www.openstacksv.com/
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev