Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Anne Gentle]

It's your judgement call - and certainly Cathy and Neela also are in this group.

My personal judgement call is that the contributions are not as significant as 
what we have used for extra-ATC status in the past.

My sense it that the communication would be an explanation that we found they 
were marked as a co-author on a docs patch, and while you did not submit their 
name for extra-ATC status for docs specifically, we appreciate their help. It's 
an outreach mechanism, rather than for recognition or reward.

Thanks,
Anne


> On Aug 23, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Lana Brindley  wrote:
> 
> OK, so I need to email Suhartono and Harish then?
> 
> L
> 
>> On 23/08/16 22:52, Anne Gentle wrote:
>> Here's a quick glance, we may have only missed a few potential. 
>> 
>> Has no patch: 
>> Co-Authored-By: Suhartono >  > > 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:cloudsuhartono%2540gmail.com
>> 
>> 
>> Only patch is not merged:
>> Co-Authored-By: Harish K 
>> > 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Harish+K%22
>> 
>> 
>> Has gerrit account but all patches are in other repos:
>> Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang >  > >
>> Co-Authored-By: Neela Shah  
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Has a patch in api-site:
>> Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
>>  > >)
>> 
>> Has patches in openstack-manuals:
>> Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia >  > 
>> Co-Authored-By: Victor Howard >  > >
>> Co-Authored-By: OlgaGusarenko >  > >
>> 
>> Core security-docs:
>> Co-Authored-By: Nathaniel Dillon >  > >
>> Core docs:
>> Co-Authored-By: KATO Tomoyuki >  > >
>> Co-Authored-By: Matt Kassawara >  > >
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Lana Brindley > > wrote:
>> 
>>Oh, crud. We might have missed our chance ...
>> 
>>L
>> 
>>>On 22/08/16 22:20, Anne Gentle wrote:
>>> Sorry I phrased that badly. In the past I reached out. I have not done that 
>>> with this group.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anne
>>> 
>>> 
 On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:13 AM, Lana Brindley > wrote:
 
 Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry.
 
 Did you hear back from them, Anne?
 
 L
 
> On 18/08/16 22:05, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Nice catch, Tom.
> 
> Lana, you also need to see if they are already Foundation members. I 
> reached out directly using the email they listed to ask the individual.
> 
> Anne
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Tom Fifield    >> wrote:
> 
>   On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> 
>   Hi cores,
> 
>   Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? 
> From Doug's email to the dev list:
> 
>   Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
>   teams should identify contributors who have had a significant 
> impact
>   this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the 
> regular
>   process because they have not submitted a patch.
> 
> 
>   In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who 
> participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's 
> shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation 
> by 16 August, so we don't have much time.
> 
> 
>   FWIW - Co-Authored-By is not included in ATC unless requested by the 
> project:
> 
> 

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Lana Brindley]

OK, so I need to email Suhartono and Harish then?

L

On 23/08/16 22:52, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Here's a quick glance, we may have only missed a few potential. 
> 
> Has no patch: 
> Co-Authored-By: Suhartono    > 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:cloudsuhartono%2540gmail.com
> 
> 
> Only patch is not merged:
> Co-Authored-By: Harish K 
> > 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Harish+K%22
> 
> 
> Has gerrit account but all patches are in other repos:
>  Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang    >
> Co-Authored-By: Neela Shah  
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Has a patch in api-site:
> Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
>   >)
> 
> Has patches in openstack-manuals:
> Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia    
> Co-Authored-By: Victor Howard    >
> Co-Authored-By: OlgaGusarenko    >
> 
> Core security-docs:
> Co-Authored-By: Nathaniel Dillon    >
> Core docs:
> Co-Authored-By: KATO Tomoyuki    >
> Co-Authored-By: Matt Kassawara    >
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Lana Brindley  > wrote:
> 
> Oh, crud. We might have missed our chance ...
> 
> L
> 
> On 22/08/16 22:20, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > Sorry I phrased that badly. In the past I reached out. I have not done 
> that with this group.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anne
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:13 AM, Lana Brindley 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry.
> >>
> >> Did you hear back from them, Anne?
> >>
> >> L
> >>
> >>> On 18/08/16 22:05, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >>> Nice catch, Tom.
> >>>
> >>> Lana, you also need to see if they are already Foundation members. I 
> reached out directly using the email they listed to ask the individual.
> >>>
> >>> Anne
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Tom Fifield    >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Hi cores,
> >>>
> >>>Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC 
> status? From Doug's email to the dev list:
> >>>
> >>>Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], 
> Project
> >>>teams should identify contributors who have had a 
> significant impact
> >>>this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using 
> the regular
> >>>process because they have not submitted a patch.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who 
> participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's 
> shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 
> August, so we don't have much time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>FWIW - Co-Authored-By is not included in ATC unless requested by 
> the project:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>git log --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep 
> "Co-Authored-By" |
> >>>sort | uniq
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/api-site$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
> --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
>  sort | uniq
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
>   >)
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia 
> 

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Anne Gentle]

Here's a quick glance, we may have only missed a few potential.

Has no patch:
Co-Authored-By: Suhartono 
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Harish+K%22


Has gerrit account but all patches are in other repos:
 Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang 


--
Has a patch in api-site:
Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com )

Has patches in openstack-manuals:
Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia 
wrote:

> Oh, crud. We might have missed our chance ...
>
> L
>
> On 22/08/16 22:20, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > Sorry I phrased that badly. In the past I reached out. I have not done
> that with this group.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anne
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:13 AM, Lana Brindley 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry.
> >>
> >> Did you hear back from them, Anne?
> >>
> >> L
> >>
> >>> On 18/08/16 22:05, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >>> Nice catch, Tom.
> >>>
> >>> Lana, you also need to see if they are already Foundation members. I
> reached out directly using the email they listed to ask the individual.
> >>>
> >>> Anne
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Tom Fifield  > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Hi cores,
> >>>
> >>>Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status?
> From Doug's email to the dev list:
> >>>
> >>>Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2],
> Project
> >>>teams should identify contributors who have had a
> significant impact
> >>>this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using
> the regular
> >>>process because they have not submitted a patch.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who
> participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's
> shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by
> 16 August, so we don't have much time.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>FWIW - Co-Authored-By is not included in ATC unless requested by
> the project:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>git log --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep
> "Co-Authored-By" |
> >>>sort | uniq
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/api-site$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By
> --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
>  sort | uniq
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com  hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com>)
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia <
> manjeet.s.bha...@intel.com >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/openstack-manuals$ git log
> --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
>  sort | uniq
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang  >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Harish K>
> >>>Co-Authored-By: KATO Tomoyuki  >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Matt Kassawara >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Nathaniel Dillon  >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Neela Shah >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: OlgaGusarenko >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Suhartono >
> >>>Co-Authored-By: Victor Howard  >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core <
> https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core>
> >>>Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net  openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net>
> >>>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core <
> https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core>
> >>>More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp <
> https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Anne Gentle
> >>> www.justwriteclick.com 
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lana Brindley
> >> Technical Writer
> >> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> >> http://lanabrindley.com
> >>
> >> --

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Anne Gentle]

Sorry I phrased that badly. In the past I reached out. I have not done that 
with this group.

Thanks,
Anne


> On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:13 AM, Lana Brindley  
> wrote:
> 
> Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry.
> 
> Did you hear back from them, Anne?
> 
> L
> 
>> On 18/08/16 22:05, Anne Gentle wrote:
>> Nice catch, Tom.
>> 
>> Lana, you also need to see if they are already Foundation members. I reached 
>> out directly using the email they listed to ask the individual.
>> 
>> Anne
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Tom Fifield > > wrote:
>> 
>>On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
>> 
>>Hi cores,
>> 
>>Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From 
>> Doug's email to the dev list:
>> 
>>Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
>>teams should identify contributors who have had a significant 
>> impact
>>this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the 
>> regular
>>process because they have not submitted a patch.
>> 
>> 
>>In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who 
>> participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's 
>> shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 
>> 16 August, so we don't have much time.
>> 
>> 
>>FWIW - Co-Authored-By is not included in ATC unless requested by the 
>> project:
>> 
>> 
>>git log --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
>>sort | uniq
>> 
>> 
>>fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/api-site$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
>> --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
>>> sort | uniq
>>Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
>> )
>>Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia > >
>> 
>> 
>>fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/openstack-manuals$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
>> --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
>>> sort | uniq
>>Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang > >
>>Co-Authored-By: Harish K> >
>>Co-Authored-By: KATO Tomoyuki > >
>>Co-Authored-By: Matt Kassawara > >
>>Co-Authored-By: Nathaniel Dillon > >
>>Co-Authored-By: Neela Shah > >
>>Co-Authored-By: OlgaGusarenko > >
>>Co-Authored-By: Suhartono > >
>>Co-Authored-By: Victor Howard > >
>> 
>> 
>>-- 
>>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core 
>> 
>>Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net 
>> 
>>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core 
>> 
>>More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Anne Gentle
>> www.justwriteclick.com 
> 
> -- 
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
> Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Lana Brindley]

Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry.

Did you hear back from them, Anne?

L

On 18/08/16 22:05, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Nice catch, Tom.
> 
> Lana, you also need to see if they are already Foundation members. I reached 
> out directly using the email they listed to ask the individual.
> 
> Anne
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Tom Fifield  > wrote:
> 
> On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> 
> Hi cores,
> 
> Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From 
> Doug's email to the dev list:
> 
> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant 
> impact
> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the 
> regular
> process because they have not submitted a patch.
> 
> 
> In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who 
> participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's 
> shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 
> August, so we don't have much time.
> 
> 
> FWIW - Co-Authored-By is not included in ATC unless requested by the 
> project:
> 
> 
> git log --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
> sort | uniq
> 
> 
> fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/api-site$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
> --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
> > sort | uniq
> Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
> )
> Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia  >
> 
> 
> fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/openstack-manuals$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
> --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
> > sort | uniq
> Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang  >
> Co-Authored-By: Harish K >
> Co-Authored-By: KATO Tomoyuki  >
> Co-Authored-By: Matt Kassawara  >
> Co-Authored-By: Nathaniel Dillon  >
> Co-Authored-By: Neela Shah  >
> Co-Authored-By: OlgaGusarenko  >
> Co-Authored-By: Suhartono  >
> Co-Authored-By: Victor Howard  >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core 
> 
> Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net 
> 
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core 
> 
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anne Gentle
> www.justwriteclick.com 
> 
> 

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Tom Fifield]

On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote:

Hi cores,

Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's 
email to the dev list:


Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
process because they have not submitted a patch.


In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated in 
docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's shop the idea on this 
list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 August, so we don't 
have much time.



FWIW - Co-Authored-By is not included in ATC unless requested by the 
project:



git log --grep=Co-Authored-By --since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |
sort | uniq


fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/api-site$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
--since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |

> sort | uniq
Co-Authored-By: Cao Xuan Hoang (hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com)
Co-Authored-By: Manjeet Singh Bhatia 


fifieldt@usagi:~/temp/openstack-manuals$ git log --grep=Co-Authored-By 
--since=6.months | grep "Co-Authored-By" |

> sort | uniq
Co-Authored-By: Cathy Hong Zhang 
Co-Authored-By: Harish K
Co-Authored-By: KATO Tomoyuki 
Co-Authored-By: Matt Kassawara 
Co-Authored-By: Nathaniel Dillon 
Co-Authored-By: Neela Shah 
Co-Authored-By: OlgaGusarenko 
Co-Authored-By: Suhartono 
Co-Authored-By: Victor Howard 


--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Lana Brindley]

I'm inclined to agree with you, Anne. My main concern is that, while I think 
what Hugh does is valuable, I'm unsure how to give him the recognition 
(especially in light of the fact that the "Active User Contributor" status is 
still non-existent).

I'll give this thread another 24 hours or so, then report back to Hugh with the 
findings. At this stage, I think there's not enough support to grant him extra 
ATC status, so if you disagree now would be the time to yell about it.

Lana

On 12/08/16 23:29, Anne Gentle wrote:
> It's a great newsletter; I highly recommend subscribing. 
> 
> I write blog posts for my TC work and so on, yet I've never thought of it as 
> a technical patch. So I lean towards not granting extra-ATC status for 
> newsletter/summary work in particular. It's not documentation in the sense of 
> what this team produces. 
> 
> There should be another way to recognize the efforts, and I could see it 
> fitting into one of the "Active User Contributor" recognition efforts. In 
> case you haven't heard of it, they are working on a status similar to ATC. 
> See http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2016-June/001067.html 
> for ideas on what they're adding there. Timing might be late for Hugh but 
> this is the category in my mind.
> 
> Anne
> 
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Lana Brindley  > wrote:
> 
> Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes 
> the 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter 
> (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/ 
> ).
> 
> I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think 
> this is probably worthy of a vote (which is the main benefit of ATC status 
> after Barcelona). Do you think we should offer him extra-ATC status in docs 
> because of his work with making sense of the dev list?
> 
> Interested in your thoughts.
> 
> (Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through 
> Linux Australia)
> 
> Lana
> 
> 
> On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > Hi cores,
> >
> > Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From 
> Doug's email to the dev list:
> >
> >> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
> >> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
> >> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
> >> process because they have not submitted a patch.
> >
> > In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who 
> participated in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's 
> shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 
> August, so we don't have much time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com
> 
> 
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core 
> 
> Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net 
> 
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core 
> 
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anne Gentle
> www.justwriteclick.com 

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Anne Gentle]

It's a great newsletter; I highly recommend subscribing.

I write blog posts for my TC work and so on, yet I've never thought of it
as a technical patch. So I lean towards not granting extra-ATC status for
newsletter/summary work in particular. It's not documentation in the sense
of what this team produces.

There should be another way to recognize the efforts, and I could see it
fitting into one of the "Active User Contributor" recognition efforts. In
case you haven't heard of it, they are working on a status similar to ATC.
See
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/2016-June/001067.html
for ideas on what they're adding there. Timing might be late for Hugh but
this is the category in my mind.

Anne

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Lana Brindley 
wrote:

> Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the
> 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/
> openstack/lwood/).
>
> I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think
> this is probably worthy of a vote (which is the main benefit of ATC status
> after Barcelona). Do you think we should offer him extra-ATC status in docs
> because of his work with making sense of the dev list?
>
> Interested in your thoughts.
>
> (Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through
> Linux Australia)
>
> Lana
>
>
> On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > Hi cores,
> >
> > Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From
> Doug's email to the dev list:
> >
> >> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
> >> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
> >> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
> >> process because they have not submitted a patch.
> >
> > In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated
> in docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's shop the idea
> on this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 August, so
> we don't have much time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lana
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
> Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Anne Gentle
www.justwriteclick.com
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Kato, Tomoyuki]

I'm uncertain whether it is acceptable,
but I think it is worth to nominate him.

KATO Tomoyuki

> Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the 
> 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter
> (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/).
> 
> I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think 
> this is probably worthy of a vote (which is
> the main benefit of ATC status after Barcelona). Do you think we should offer 
> him extra-ATC status in docs because of
> his work with making sense of the dev list?
> 
> Interested in your thoughts.
> 
> (Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through Linux 
> Australia)
> 
> Lana
> 
> 
> On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > Hi cores,
> >
> > Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's 
> > email to the dev list:
> >
> >> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
> >> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
> >> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
> >> process because they have not submitted a patch.
> >
> > In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated in 
> > docs sprints, as an example. If you know
> of anyone, let's shop the idea on this list. We need to have our proposals to 
> Foundation by 16 August, so we don't have
> much time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lana
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Lana Brindley
> Technical Writer
> Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
> http://lanabrindley.com


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

[Lana Brindley]

Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the 
'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter 
(http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/).

I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think this 
is probably worthy of a vote (which is the main benefit of ATC status after 
Barcelona). Do you think we should offer him extra-ATC status in docs because 
of his work with making sense of the dev list?

Interested in your thoughts.

(Disclosure: Hugh is a colleague and long-time friend of mine through Linux 
Australia)

Lana


On 11/08/16 09:28, Lana Brindley wrote:
> Hi cores,
> 
> Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's 
> email to the dev list:
> 
>> Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project
>> teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact
>> this cycle but who would not qualify for ATC status using the regular
>> process because they have not submitted a patch. 
> 
> In the past, docs have given extra ATC status to people who participated in 
> docs sprints, as an example. If you know of anyone, let's shop the idea on 
> this list. We need to have our proposals to Foundation by 16 August, so we 
> don't have much time.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lana
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp