On 04/26/2010 10:23:21 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/04/10 16:47, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of the standard release process there is still this
> thread:
> >
> > Re: [Openvpn-devel] Unpackged Windows binaries? -- Problems
> building
> > 2.1 rc15 on Windows XP
> >
> > and its
On 04/27/2010 05:58:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > IMO OpenVPN is encouraging bad practices by supplying packages for
> > distros that include OpenVPN.
>
> Ideally the package for that distro as made by OpenVPN is always
> equivalent to the one made by the distributor.
I'm
On 04/27/2010 05:58:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > IMO OpenVPN is encouraging bad practices by supplying packages for
> > distros that include OpenVPN.
>
> Ideally the package for that distro as made by OpenVPN is always
> equivalent to the one made by the distributor.
>
>
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> IMO OpenVPN is encouraging bad practices by supplying packages for
> distros that include OpenVPN.
Ideally the package for that distro as made by OpenVPN is always
equivalent to the one made by the distributor.
What do I mean? I mean that I'm happy with .spec files and the
On 27-Apr-10, at 1:54 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 09:46:06 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is
why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I
On 04/26/2010 02:11:26 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > > the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
> > > binaries
> >
> > Really?
>
> They seem to have stopped sometime after July 30 2008.
>
>
On 04/26/2010 09:46:06 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> > On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is
> why
> >> I
> >>
> >> created the pkg+dmg.
> >
> > I agree,
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:46 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I agree, because the Apple development kit is shipped,
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I agree, because the Apple development kit is shipped,
if not installed, on every Mac.
It ships on
On 04/26/2010 06:02:46 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/04/10 21:11, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On Debian all I had to do was "aptitude install nsis" and then
> > run it to make MS Windows installers. Plug and play, no
> > compiling necessary.
> >
>
> Just a little nitpick, when you run
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 27-Apr-10, at 1:58 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >
> > The problem addressed is that there only binaries available
> > for MS Windows are pre-packaged in an installer executable.
> > This means that anyone who wants stock binaries but a
> > modified
On 27-Apr-10, at 5:11 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
binaries
Really?
They seem to have stopped sometime after July 30 2008.
On 27-Apr-10, at 1:58 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 10:23:21 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 16:47, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Speaking of the standard release process there is still this
thread:
Re: [Openvpn-devel] Unpackged Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 21:11, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
[...snip...]
> IMO people who don't rely on their distro for systems integration
> and security patches are asking for trouble. There are of
On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
> > binaries
>
> Really?
They seem to have stopped sometime after July 30 2008.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080730205524/openvpn.net/index.php/
downloads.html
It's hard to
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
> binaries
Really?
> and it now talking about doing the same for OS/X binaries.
Recently discussed work for contrib/ produces a .dmg, very much a
package in my view.
> There's clear utility.
I guess it depends. I'm not
On 04/26/2010 10:23:21 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26/04/10 16:47, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > Speaking of the standard release process there is still this
> thread:
> >
> > Re: [Openvpn-devel] Unpackged Windows binaries? -- Problems
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 16:47, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 03:42:37 AM, Arnoud Vermeer wrote:
>> Hi Toby,
>>
>> I for one appreciate your effort and would love to see this in the
>> standard
>> release process.
>
> Speaking of the standard release
18 matches
Mail list logo
