-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/04/10 13:20, Davide Brini wrote:
> contrib/OCSP_check/OCSP_check.sh:
> New barebone script to demonstrate how to use $tls_serial_{n}
> to perform simple OCSP queries using OpenSSL command line
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/10 16:39, Fabian Knittel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> changes since the last round of patches:
>
> - Added Signed-Off-By to all patches.
>
> - Properly mentioned "--vlan-accept all" mode in options.c (it was
>missing in a few places).
>
> -
On 04/27/2010 05:58:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > IMO OpenVPN is encouraging bad practices by supplying packages for
> > distros that include OpenVPN.
>
> Ideally the package for that distro as made by OpenVPN is always
> equivalent to the one made by the distributor.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/04/10 13:20, Davide Brini wrote:
> contrib/OCSP_check/OCSP_check.sh:
> New barebone script to demonstrate how to use $tls_serial_{n}
> to perform simple OCSP queries using OpenSSL command line
>
contrib/OCSP_check/OCSP_check.sh:
New barebone script to demonstrate how to use $tls_serial_{n}
to perform simple OCSP queries using OpenSSL command line
"openssl ocsp". Minimal sanity checks to fail if user tries to
use it without
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> IMO OpenVPN is encouraging bad practices by supplying packages for
> distros that include OpenVPN.
Ideally the package for that distro as made by OpenVPN is always
equivalent to the one made by the distributor.
What do I mean? I mean that I'm happy with .spec files and the
>> On 22/04/10 18:40, Siegfried Müller - MB Connect Line GmbH wrote:
>> Hi developers,
>>
>> does anyone tried the "inactive" option with the openvpn version 2.1.1?
>> I step up from 2.0.1 to 2.1.1 and get the problem, that the client does not
>> disconnect after inactivity.
>> If i set the
On 27-Apr-10, at 1:54 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 09:46:06 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is
why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I
On 04/26/2010 02:11:26 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > > the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
> > > binaries
> >
> > Really?
>
> They seem to have stopped sometime after July 30 2008.
>
>
On 04/26/2010 09:46:06 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> > On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is
> why
> >> I
> >>
> >> created the pkg+dmg.
> >
> > I agree,
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:46 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I agree, because the Apple development kit is shipped,
On 27-Apr-10, at 12:19 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
I don't think unpackaged OS X binaries are very useful, which is why
I
created the pkg+dmg.
I agree, because the Apple development kit is shipped,
if not installed, on every Mac.
It ships on
On 04/26/2010 06:02:46 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/04/10 21:11, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On Debian all I had to do was "aptitude install nsis" and then
> > run it to make MS Windows installers. Plug and play, no
> > compiling necessary.
> >
>
> Just a little nitpick, when you run
On 04/26/2010 06:19:31 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 27-Apr-10, at 1:58 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> >
> > The problem addressed is that there only binaries available
> > for MS Windows are pre-packaged in an installer executable.
> > This means that anyone who wants stock binaries but a
> > modified
On 27-Apr-10, at 5:11 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
the project is already releasing unpackaged Linux
binaries
Really?
They seem to have stopped sometime after July 30 2008.
On 27-Apr-10, at 1:58 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 04/26/2010 10:23:21 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 16:47, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
Speaking of the standard release process there is still this
thread:
Re: [Openvpn-devel] Unpackged Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/04/10 21:11, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 11:53:19 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
[...snip...]
> IMO people who don't rely on their distro for systems integration
> and security patches are asking for trouble. There are of
17 matches
Mail list logo
