-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/10 21:15, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> back to the list after some private e-mails...
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:25:54PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:13:09PM +0900, Kazuyoshi Aizawa wrote:
>>> I attached a pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/10 00:56, Pierre Bourdon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch adds support for SOCKS plain text (username/password)
> authentication as described in RFC 1929. It adds an optional third
> parameter to the socks-proxy option, which is a file containi
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 05:50:19PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> If I've understood it correctly, this is related to signing the Windows
> TUN/TAP driver. So if you don't have a signing key/tool available, it
> is still possible to build the rest of OpenVPN. You might even manage
> to ins
Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Peter: settings.in is stored in git.
Ok.
> I agree that there should be no way one could make an unsigned build by
> mistake. I think dazo's suggestion about having a command-line switch
> ("force unsigned build") is a good one. The SIGNTOOL variable could then
> be used
> > What if build_all.py did this:
>
> > - Check if SIGNTOOL is enabled in settings.in:
> > - Yes: fail if can't import "sign" module
> > - No: don't fail if can't import "sign" module
>
> > I think existence of the SIGNTOOL variable gives a good clue of user's
> > intentions. Note that the bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/10 18:11, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/10 17:55, Peter Stuge wrote:
>>> David Sommerseth wrote:
>> Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if
>> the optional signtool python class is not available.
> Wha
Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> What if build_all.py did this:
>
> - Check if SIGNTOOL is enabled in settings.in:
> - Yes: fail if can't import "sign" module
> - No: don't fail if can't import "sign" module
This also sounds good. (Who typically creates settings.in? Is one in git?)
//Peter
David Sommerseth wrote:
> >> So if you don't have a signing key/tool available, it is still
> >> possible to build the rest of OpenVPN.
> >
> > Fine, but this is not really acceptable when James&co builds OpenVPN,
> > so I am requesting a solution that allows them to specify to the
> > build proce
> On 12/11/10 17:55, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > David Sommerseth wrote:
> Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if
> the optional signtool python class is not available.
> >>> What is it needed for? Is it really *always* optional?
> >> If I've understood it correctly, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/10 17:55, Peter Stuge wrote:
> David Sommerseth wrote:
Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if
the optional signtool python class is not available.
>>>
>>> What is it needed for? Is it really *always* optional?
David Sommerseth wrote:
> >> Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if
> >> the optional signtool python class is not available.
> >
> > What is it needed for? Is it really *always* optional?
>
> If I've understood it correctly, this is related to signing the Windows
> TUN/TAP
> Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
>> From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
>> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py
>>
>> Modified win/build_all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/10 17:36, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>> From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
>> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Removed h
Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py
>
> Modified win/build_all.py so that b
Second version of the patch. As suggested by dazo I added printing of an
informational message if the sign module is not found. Also fixed a few
typos (signtool -> sign).
From a6321a47b0d4341700ad226a8b6c9abcba2052a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
Date: Fri, 12 N
Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> >From 327d6c66fff6962a96f86110dc91b1dad07ca224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:30:07 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Added check for variable CONFIGURE_DEFINES into options.c
>
> The file containing CONFIGURE_DEFINE
From 57b983dc2a1f4a31d3b7c0e2f6de7f778d234b2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:32:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded signtool dependency from win/build_all.py
Modified win/build_all.py so that build does not fail even if the opt
>From 327d6c66fff6962a96f86110dc91b1dad07ca224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Samuli=20Sepp=C3=A4nen?=
List-Post: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:30:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Added check for variable CONFIGURE_DEFINES into options.c
The file containing CON
> Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
>> PS I am not directly involved in the development of openvpn :)
>>
>
> Actually I think you are! Because you have at the very least
> contributed information about bugs that you have encountered,
> which might not have been discovered otherwise.
>
> Writing co
Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> PS I am not directly involved in the development of openvpn :)
Actually I think you are! Because you have at the very least
contributed information about bugs that you have encountered,
which might not have been discovered otherwise.
Writing code is not the only way to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/10 12:28, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:18:26AM +0100, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>> PS I am not directly involved in the development of openvpn :)
>
> Please do get involved more :-) - you seem to have a knack for fi
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:18:26AM +0100, Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> PS I am not directly involved in the development of openvpn :)
Please do get involved more :-) - you seem to have a knack for finding
sore spots, we need that.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
john s wolter wrote:
I'm writing in response to this posting subject..
"Re: [Openvpn-devel] VERY weird interaction between openvpn and
opensc-pkcs11"
When it comes to debugging problems inside OpenVPN and other FOSS
software there is a lack of design information. Architecture diagram
& Theo
23 matches
Mail list logo
