David Sommerseth wrote: > >> So if you don't have a signing key/tool available, it is still > >> possible to build the rest of OpenVPN. > > > > Fine, but this is not really acceptable when James&co builds OpenVPN, > > so I am requesting a solution that allows them to specify to the > > build process that they want a fatal error if signing is not > > possible. > > That's a good point! I didn't think about this one. > > What about that the build script stops up and asks if it should > continue without signing?
Kinda nice to keep everything non-interactive if possible.. > And in addition having a command line argument accepting building > without signing? I like that idea a lot! Possibly it could be the other way around (argument leads to error if no sign possible) in order to optimize for community builds, but there's also a good point to having the default (no argument given) be more picky about when it succeeds. //Peter
