On 22/01/21 20:03, Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Philip,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers
willing to do commercial work?
It could be as simple as:
* name
* email address
*
Am 22.01.2021 um 23:29 schrieb Philip Prindeville:
On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:57 AM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
On 22/01/21 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers
willing to do commercial work?
It could be as simple as:
On 23/01/21 3:13 am, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> You'll need to remove the dnsmasq package and select
> CONFIG_PACKAGE_isc-dhcp-server-ipv4 (or -ipv6 which actually supports both
> IPv4 and IPv6, but the UCI scripting for dynDNS for IPv6 as I said is
> missing). That will bring in Bind and
Hardware
Atheros AR7241
16M SPI-NOR
64M DDR2
Atheros AR9283 2T2R b/g/n
2x Fast Ethernet (built-in)
Installation
Transfer the Firmware update to the device using SCP.
Install using fwupdate.real -m -d
Signed-off-by: David Bauer
---
Enable support for the Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor+ RF filter via
device-tree. The old way of using platform data is not required anymore,
as it was only used on the now removed ar71xx target.
Signed-off-by: David Bauer
---
.../ath/551-ath9k_ubnt_uap_plus_hsr.patch | 35 ++-
I'll try splitting it into smaller pieces as well.
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14535
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:47 AM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I posted the following PR some time ago (late November) and it's languishing:
>
>
What's the size difference here. I'd be curious to replace dnsmasq for
the default setup, but only if it brings an advantage in size and
security.
Just a personal interest.
Best,
Paul
--
Jan 22, 2021 11:44:50 AM Philip Prindeville
:
On Jan 22, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Alberto Bursi
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/01/21 19:53, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> As an alternative to dnsmasq, master now has isc-dhcp (v4 only) and Bind
>> integration, so that's getting close to the essential functionality that
>> dnsmasq provides.
>> I
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:57 AM, Alberto Bursi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/01/21 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about
>> developers willing to do commercial work?
>> It could be as simple as:
>> * name
>> * email address
>>
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 12:03 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about
>> developers willing to do commercial work?
>>
>> It could be as
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Alberto Bursi
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Januar 2021 19:55
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] owipcalc: remove package
>
> I think you are ovverreacting a
Hi Philip,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about
> developers willing to do commercial work?
>
> It could be as simple as:
>
> * name
> * email address
> * mobile (if wanted)
> *
On 22/01/21 19:53, Philip Prindeville wrote:
As an alternative to dnsmasq, master now has isc-dhcp (v4 only) and Bind
integration, so that's getting close to the essential functionality that
dnsmasq provides.
I stopped using dnsmasq about 8 years ago because it has several minor
On 22/01/21 19:23, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers
willing to do commercial work?
It could be as simple as:
* name
* email address
* mobile (if wanted)
* packages/platforms/architectures you maintain or have
I think you are ovverreacting a bit, package feeds are still part of
OpenWrt project and jow has commit access there as well.
Anyobody that needs that tool can still take it from there.
Actually moving it to Packages allows other downstream projects like
Entware-ng (that is using OpenWrt
As an alternative to dnsmasq, master now has isc-dhcp (v4 only) and Bind
integration, so that's getting close to the essential functionality that
dnsmasq provides.
I stopped using dnsmasq about 8 years ago because it has several minor
violations of the RFC's (which the Kelly's claim are
Hi,
I posted the following PR some time ago (late November) and it's languishing:
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/14028
Can I get some reviews of it?
X.509 authentication is a more attractive alternative to simple PSK
authentication (more entropy, less susceptible to dictionary
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers
willing to do commercial work?
It could be as simple as:
* name
* email address
* mobile (if wanted)
* packages/platforms/architectures you maintain or have competence in
* whether you're available full-time,
Hi Bjorn,
Op woensdag 20 januari 2021 om 18:36 schreef Bjørn Mork
:
Convert users of the "fonfxc" and "sge" parsers to the generic
"openwrt,uimage", using device specific "openwrt,padding" properties.
Signed-off-by: Bjørn Mork
I gave the v4 a few tries on my DIR-878 A1, and it works.
Changelog:
- ath10k-ct: Pull in some upstream patches.
Runtime-tested on ipq806x (Netgear R7800).
Signed-off-by: Michael Yartys
---
package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile
Jo-Philipp Wich kirjoitti 22.1.2021 klo 12.37:
> unfortunately we lack a reliable reproducer so far.
>
> A packet capture would be most helpful, another option would be a bisect of
> the intermediate dnsmasq Git revisions.
I bisected the dnsmasq upstream commits, and looks like it is caused by
Ah okay. I see no problem anymore. :)
But jow is the maintainer and author of owipcalc. I would even say that
this tool could also be useful on other paltforms and not only OpenWrt.
I would take care of that if jow is fine with it.
Bests,
Nick
On 1/22/21 1:43 PM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Jost Menke
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Januar 2021 13:25
> To: Jan Hoffmann ; openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: drvl...@gmail.com; m...@david-bauer.net
> Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH] ramips:
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Nick
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Januar 2021 12:50
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] owipcalc: remove package
>
> Is it okay to push c-code into packages
I successfully tested this patch on a Netgear R6800 with one bad
eraseblock. Without the patch, the device is unable to correctly read
the factory partition. It will generate random MAC addresses because the
actual addresses are unreadable, and TX power will be limited to 6dBm,
rendering it
Is it okay to push c-code into packages feed, if it is not patch
related? (never saw this)
On 1/22/21 10:51 AM, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
This is a helpful utility, but it does not have any dependencies
in this repository. Move it to packages feed.
Cc: Jo-Philipp Wich
Cc: Nick Hainke
On a platform with many very different devices, like found on kirkwood,
the generic profile seems like a remnant of the past that does not
have a real use anymore.
Remove it to have one thing less to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
target/linux/kirkwood/profiles/00-default.mk |
We have support for reference boards available on this target, so
support for an additional generic profile does not make much sense.
Remove it to have one thing less to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
target/linux/mediatek/mt7622/profiles/default.mk | 15 ---
On a platform with many very different devices, like found on ramips,
the generic profiles seem like remnants of the past that do not
have a real use anymore.
Remove them to have one thing less to maintain.
Actually, rt288x didn't have a default profile in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Adrian
On a platform with many very different devices, like found on ipq806x,
the generic profile seems like a remnant of the past that does not
have a real use anymore.
Remove it to have one thing less to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
target/linux/ipq806x/profiles/00-default.mk | 10
On a platform with many very different devices, like found on ipq40xx,
the generic profile seems like a remnant of the past that does not
have a real use anymore.
Remove it to have one thing less to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
target/linux/ipq40xx/profiles/00-default.mk | 9
On a platform with many very different devices, like found on ath79,
the generic profiles seem like remnants of the past that do not
have a real use anymore.
Remove them to have one thing less to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
.../linux/ath79/generic/profiles/00-default.mk | 16
Hi Hannu,
unfortunately we lack a reliable reproducer so far.
A packet capture would be most helpful, another option would be a bisect of
the intermediate dnsmasq Git revisions.
~ Jo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
This is a helpful utility, but it does not have any dependencies
in this repository. Move it to packages feed.
Cc: Jo-Philipp Wich
Cc: Nick Hainke
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
package/network/utils/owipcalc/Makefile | 44 -
package/network/utils/owipcalc/src/owipcalc.c | 950
This is a helpful utility, but it does not have any dependencies
in this repository. Move it to packages feed.
The package does not seem to have a maintainer.
Cc: Jo-Philipp Wich
Cc: Nick Hainke
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler
---
package/network/utils/maccalc/Makefile | 43
Petr Štetiar [2021-01-13 00:39:08]:
> Bjørn Mork [2020-11-30 23:19:25]:
>
> Hi,
>
> > But I have NOT run tested this on any of the affected existing devices.
> > Which means that we don't know if they work at all. And if they don't then
> > you will not have a rootfs. So some care should be
36 matches
Mail list logo
