on line 181 at column 136: EntityRef: expecting ';'
Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.
I did preserve the previous configuration, if that makes a difference on
the wifi issues.
Thanks for any info about these issues and if they're known.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep
.
Fixed with http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/changeset/9939
Again, thanks - as above, if I have any questions, I'll ask about them in
a follow-up.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel
://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2013-
November/022653.html
Handy, thanks! Somehow I missed this post.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:32:03 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
It seems the PREFIX/INSTALL_BASE message on the third line above is
what's causing my issue. Looking at the makefiles, though, I can't see
where it's picking up either value from.
Can someone point me in the right direction to fix
at the makefiles, though, I can't see where
it's picking up either value from.
Can someone point me in the right direction to fix this?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel
first thing that I need to
kick it to get it working).
Where's a good place to start trying to identify the issue?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
that
prevent it from being used for administration - I can watch live traffic
and historical data, but I wasn't able to perform administration on
anything that I tried (LAN/WAN interfaces primarily).
Where do I go from here - or is there other info that would be more
useful to track this down?
--
Jim
need to remember to do when weirdness happens),
I saw that it was disabled. Recompiling now and will follow-up and let
the list know if that took care of it.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:23:21 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
Recompiling now and will follow-up and let the list know if that took
care of it.
That did, once I remembered that since I enabled shadow passwords, I had
to actually reset the password. :)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic
do a 'make distclean' before every compile, so it should be building
completely from scratch each time.
Is this a known issue?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
forgotten about it.
Will reconfigure to use the updated uClibc and let it build with that.
Thanks again,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
0.9.32-git and 0.9.33 right now.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
to build 27572, which I knew worked
prior to the upgrade.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:55:38 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
I updated to r28089 yesterday and have noticed a significant number of
problems with wireless since then.
The hardware is a D-Link DIR-825. I only use Radio0 for my wireless.
Normally, I can stream video without any problems to our
connects but the dhcpoffer is never accepted by the
device. Restarting the network on the router gave me a temporary fix.
I'll get this version (last change shows as 28096, same as yours)
installed and see if that helps.
Thanks!
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies
r28106 but the last changed rev
is r28096).
After a while, stations just can't reconnect and get an IP address,
though the router is sending the address.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:56:59 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
No change here with 28096 (svn info shows r28106 but the last changed
rev is r28096).
After a while, stations just can't reconnect and get an IP address,
though the router is sending the address.
Reverted back to the previous version
,
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
of that for me?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
connection or JTAG connector to use.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:55:10 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
Trying to compile r22936 here.
Still seeing this with r22987 - am I the only one seeing this issue?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
that a try. It seems odd, though, that it's trying to
build cfdisk when I've told it not to - but I'm willing to give anything
a try to get past this. :-)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt
it not to - but
as an old coworker of mine was fond of saying, if it's stupid but it
works, it ain't stupid. :-)
Thanks for the assist, much appreciated.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel
I was seeing a problem (indeed, the only
updates seemed to be for a different platform than what I build for).
Appreciate all the tips and everyone's help. I'm still fairly new to
building this code - but I also like testing bleeding-edge code. :-)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic
tracked it down to build 22385 - 22384 (which has the last commit at
22383) builds, 22385 doesn't for me.
What process do you use to clean the offending package?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:13:32 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
I've tracked it down to build 22385 - 22384 (which has the last commit
at 22383) builds, 22385 doesn't for me.
Really strange, I backed down to 22383 and now it won't build that one
either.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:37:13 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le lundi 26 juillet 2010 à 16:13 +, Jim Henderson a écrit :
I've tracked it down to build 22385 - 22384 (which has the last commit
at 22383) builds, 22385 doesn't for me.
But you said earlier that a later revision (22388) works
it should be in a FAQ. Finding the root cause
may be interesting, but I think that to most people here, the benefits
don't outweight the cost of tracking down these bugs.
Fair enough - that trick did work for me, so I've got 22390 built.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies
with different targets?
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:18:53 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
When trying to build from the latest sources, I get the following output
(with V=99) on 'make world':
Seems to be working now.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
testing - r22344 seems to build OK, r22348
doesn't. I'll see if I can narrow it down a bit more (I'm building
r22344 now).
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel
tomorrow
morning, it looks like r22380 is going to be successful, so I'll jump
ahead to r22384 and try that next - that'll probably run while I'm
sleeping.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
for the kernel build would
be selected automatically.
Perfect, thanks for both pieces of information. I'll try my new build
out this weekend. :-)
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
Hi,
I've just started using openwrt on a D-Link DIR-825 (as those who also
read the user list are probably already aware), and in trying to
troubleshoot a DLNA issue, I'd like to try the latest experimental
firmware pulled from the source repository.
In configuring the firmware image, I have
34 matches
Mail list logo
