Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:58 AM Daniel Dickinson < open...@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote: > On 16-05-05 11:38 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote: > > There is plenty of blame to go around, I think. Seems like the Lede > > guys should have had the decency to at least inform the O

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

an ugly fork is very much not welcome. --Jonathan Bennett On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM John Clark <inin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>the sudden deletion of our widely published openwrt.org email > addresses somewhat undermines this > > Just so I am not jumping to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Contributing to OpenWrt

Also worth noting is the 3rd party packages feed over at https://github.com/openwrt/packages This could be a good place to get started hacking on code for the OpenWrt project. On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:47 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 17 December 2015 at 01:28, Mohammed Billoo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

report the revision. We could bake the short hash into the image, but this would not be useful if any commits were added locally, whereas the r number would still show some useful information. Would it be possible to track the revision number in an automated way even in a git repo? So store the r number, and automatically increment on commits. Not sure if that's an option, but it seems like it might address the problem. --Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

Certain things are certainly broken. The body of kernel code that OpenWrt maintains (allows to bitrot) outside the upstream kernel tree is broken. Regarding downstream forks, would using Git also make it easier for people like project turris to push appropriate changes back into OpenWrt proper?

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

do bug tracking there as well, and retire trac altogether? --Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

/+JonathanBennett87/posts/bMPMjn7ZcJS --Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

On Oct 9, 2015 2:21 PM, "Jo-Philipp Wich" wrote: > > Hi. > > > Moving to Git seemed to have lots of traction at the summit, and I'll > > add my voice that this sounds like a step in the right direction for > > OpenWrt. I'm assuming that we would want to do a proper SVN to Git >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Backporting from dev branch to stable

as a LTS sort of release, with minor version updates, so a 15.05.1 might happen in a few months. You *might* get your patches included for that maintenance release. That's certainly not for me to decide, though. --Jonathan Bennett On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM Drasko DRASKOVIC <drasko.dra

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Removing Telnet

Nak on setting a default password. The blank password has served its purpose well for years now. Any preset password is asking for users to leave it default. The only problem with blank ssh logins is it removes one of the ways openwrt encouraged the user to set a password. A banner that warns

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 00/25] ramips: massive code cleanups

Those sort of emails are always just a bit discouraging. Keep in mind that they tend to come from people that are slightly autistic or have Aspergers. From the rest of us, though, thank you for your hard work. --Jonathan Bennett On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:24 AM Piotr Dymacz pep...@gmail.com

[OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt.org down due to expired certificate

I'm sure it's been noticed already, but the ssl cert for openwrt.org seems to have expired, and due to hsts being enabled, the site is impossible to access. --Jonathan ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] firmware-utils mktplinkfw: print amount of exceeding bytes

system is ignoring the make error. This is unrelated to your patch. My thinking is that it was intended behavior, and would make sense to change it in the same patch. Sorry about the confusion. --Jonathan On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:46 AM Stephan Maka step...@spaceboyz.net wrote: Jonathan Bennett

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] firmware-utils mktplinkfw: print amount of exceeding bytes

Tested and seems to work as intended. However, I think the image too big messages should be printed at the default verbosity. Currently, if make fails to generate the final image, it doesn't give any message to acknowledge, and appears to have succeeded, there are just mysteriously missing files

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dualradio 2.4/5GHz ath9k-Hardware which is deliverable?

I have had great success with the tp-link Archer c7. It fits the bid nicely, if it is available. On Wed, Jul 1, 2015, 1:06 PM Bastian Bittorf bitt...@bluebottle.com wrote: In our community we are struggling now, what we can buy. TP-Link 4900 and 4300 are EOL now in Germany. What else is there?

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] config for WNDR3800

Instead of using a premade .config, you'll want to use make menuconfig. Under Target profile, you'll find the netgear WNDR3800. Also, you will probably want to first run ./scripts/feeds update and ./scripts/feeds install -a in order to get the extra packages and luci. Then if you want luci in

[OpenWrt-Devel] An interesting feature request

A couple lines of thought collided today during a conversation with a friend who is also an fwknop user. Sending a knock over http is a clever feature, and the hidden service idea is really cool. For example, I have a web server that also has a cacti service in order to monitor that service.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] An interesting feature request

Oh dear. Sent to the wrong mailing list. Please disregard. On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:52 PM Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: A couple lines of thought collided today during a conversation with a friend who is also an fwknop user. Sending a knock over http is a clever feature

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt switches to musl by default

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:37 PM Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 June 2015 at 01:31, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct? Read again: in OpenWrt trunk Sometimes, even apparently obvious things

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt switches to musl by default

Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct? On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:24 PM Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote: Hi, I just committed a change making musl the new default libc in OpenWrt trunk, replacing uclibc. We've been preparing this for quite a while. Some

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH,v2] dnsmasq: bump to dnsmasq2.73rc9

Hey, Kevin, I know how much of a pain it is to get patches to send without getting mangled. You ought to stick with this, though, and work out how you can send patches that don't get mangled. I'm sure Steven doesn't mind pinging you back to let you know what the patches look like. Honestly, it's

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Chaos Calmer 15.05-rc1 / git-checkout

On May 28, 2015 12:14 PM, John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org wrote: On 28/05/2015 19:11, Jonathan Bennett wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Bastian Bittorf bitt...@bluebottle.com wrote: * Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org [20.05.2015 19:43]: http://downloads.openwrt.org/chaos_calmer

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Chaos Calmer 15.05-rc1 / git-checkout

on when the 15.05 branch will be available via git? ~Jonathan bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] libqrcode

, Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Missing dependency on host sed?

Are you building with multiple processes (-j 2 or greater)? This reminds me of an old bug that only popped up after a make distclean when building with multiple build threads. ~Jonathan Bennett On Sep 16, 2014 6:55 PM, John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net wrote: I'm finding that I'm running

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Missing dependency on host sed?

In your tree, in the file tools/sed/Makefile, change HOST_BUILD_PARALLEL:=1 to HOST_BUILD_PARALLEL:=0 and see if that fixes the error. On Sep 16, 2014 7:47 PM, John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: Are you

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Missing dependency on host sed?

ahead and open a ticket on dev.openwrt.org ~Jonathan Bennett On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:43 PM, John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: In your tree, in the file tools/sed/Makefile, change HOST_BUILD_PARALLEL:=1

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Barrier Breaker 14.07-rc1

openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel Is Barrier Breaker actually a branched release, or is this more of a trunk snapshot? ~Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] [Patch] [Resend] Add terminfo file in ncurses

unintended problems, namely nano fails to launch. Attached patch adds xterm-256color to the files installed by ncurses. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com diff --git a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile index 62ffdfb..26b7bf5 100644 --- a/package/libs

[OpenWrt-Devel] Add terminfo file in ncurses

installed by ncurses. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com diff --git a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile index 62ffdfb..26b7bf5 100644 --- a/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile +++ b/package/libs/ncurses/Makefile @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ ifneq ($(HOST_OS),FreeBSD

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] Update Fwknop to 2.5.1

Ping. This patch is on the tracker: http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/3861/ As I am the maintainer, but have no commit access, I would ask that someone with commit access would commit this patch to trunk and 12.09. Thanks, Jonathan Bennett On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Jonathan Bennett

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] Update Fwknop to 2.5.1

port to eth1 or drop the patch and let it default to eth0? Or is there a good way to detect the wan port and write it to the config, but only on firstboot? On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Bastian Bittorf bitt...@bluebottle.comwrote: * Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com [02.08.2013 15:22

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] Update Fwknop to 2.5.1

This is a minor update to fwknop that just released. This supersedes the previously submitted patch. Again, if this could be pushed into 12.09, it would be great. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com diff --git a/net/fwknop/Makefile b/net/fwknop/Makefile index 24d7385..a0d0454

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] fwknop package update

On Jul 24, 2013 1:19 AM, Etienne Champetier etienne.champet...@free.fr wrote: Hi Le 24/07/2013 02:10, Jonathan Bennett a écrit : The following patch updates fwknop to the newest release, v 2.5. I`m not familiar with the standard procedures for package updates after the official release

[OpenWrt-Devel] fwknop package update

The following patch updates fwknop to the newest release, v 2.5. I`m not familiar with the standard procedures for package updates after the official release. If possible, it would be great to update the package in 12.09 as well. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com diff --git

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Kernel test

On May 6, 2012 11:55 AM, Alberich de megres alberich...@gmail.com wrote: And for the Jtag? Never had to use jtag, so no idea, honestly. Sorry. On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: https://www.adafruit.com/products/70 is a great serial cable. It's

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Kernel test

...@gmail.com wrote: One more last question: which serial/jtag cable do you use? (if it is cheap, better) thanks! On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alberich de megres alberich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, @Jonathan, how get

[OpenWrt-Devel] Update fwknop, fwknopd to latest version, use new startup commands

Following patch updates fwknop to v2.0 Signed off by Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com Index: net/fwknop/patches/002-fix_init.patch === --- net/fwknop/patches/002-fix_init.patch (revision 0) +++ net/fwknop/patches/002

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Kernel test

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alberich de megres alberich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, @Jonathan, how get access to the bootloader? do you send it to the router by streaming, or write it and then boot it? Get a serial port and watch the output as you turn it on. Normally there will be a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3 V1] correct eglibc version numbers

the code. This seems to preserve correct whitespace. ~Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Kernel test

Do you have a serial port, and access to the bootloader? First step, generally, is to try a ramboot image. You transfer it and boot from ram using the boot loader. Watch the serial output to get an idea of what changes you need to support the board. ~Jonathan Bennett On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 6:58

[OpenWrt-Devel] Buildbot

Do we still have need for more buildbot machines? I have a Phenom II 4 core that is set up just for building openwrt. I'm willing to add it to the build bot if it's still needed. Let me know. Thanks, Jonathan Bennett Incom Systems ___ openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] netifd

a bit of digging, I made a change to /lib/netifd/proto/dhcp.sh Changing the function name from dhcp_setup() to proto_dhcp_setup(). I'm not sure if this is the correct fix, but dhcp is currently broken in nefifd. ~Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] assistance with porting to TEW-634GRU

few months, and I've used those as templates for working on new devices. It's also useful to start a thread on the forums and report your progress there. Some will chip in with help and advice. Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Ath9k/hostapd connection dropping problems

Peter, on your Linux machine, you can connect from the command line using wpasupplicant and get much more detailed info about what is going on. On Sep 16, 2011 1:26 PM, Peter Naulls pe...@chocky.org wrote: Some of this is speculation. I wish I had more precise details. This is true of all trunk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Any recent changes to wireless that would explain problems with wireless?

issues. Jim ~Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Package update: fwknop

This patch updates fwknop to the newest version: 2.0.0rc4 and includes a few tweaks suggested by swalker. It also adds the fwknop client to openwrt and includes a patch that changes a few default fwknopd configuration options to more sane values for Openwrt. Signed off by: Jonathan Bennett

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Fwknop-discuss] fwknop in openwrt

Not sure why, but it's taking the openwrt folks a while to pull fwknop into trunk. Until that happens, if any of you want to play around with the binaries, let me know what target you're running on, and I'll be happy to send you the .ipk file. ~Jonathan Bennett

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] New package: fwknopd

packages, IMHO. I don't expect the client to be of much use in an embedded/router setting, but if there is interest, I can package the client as well. Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] New package: fwknopd

feed. Let me know if you need anything from me. ~Jonathan Bennett On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com wrote: Ping Any progress on getting this approved? Do I need to supply any additional information? Thanks, Jonathan Bennett On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:06

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: Open WRT on TP-Link TL WR940N

On Aug 2, 2011 3:13 PM, Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de wrote: TP-Link offers only one firmware version for the 940nd, so most likely it will work. But you might be the first one to test. Tp-link uses the minor version to refer to firmware upgrades. The hardware is identical to 1.0 Krisztián

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] New package: fwknopd

Previous submission mangled a few lines. Fixed (hopefully ) here. Signed off by Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com Index: net/fwknop/Makefile === --- net/fwknop/Makefile (revision 0) +++ net/fwknop/Makefile (revision 0) @@ -0,0

[OpenWrt-Devel] New package: fwknopd

Fwknopd is a firewall knock operator daemon written by Michael Rash. It implements Single Packet Authentication to securely authorize connections through a firewall. I'm also volunteering to maintain the package in openwrt. Thanks, Jonathan Bennett Index: net/fwknop/Makefile

[OpenWrt-Devel] New package: fwknopd

Fwknopd is a firewall knock operator daemon written by Michael Rash. It implements Single Packet Authentication to securely authorize connections through a firewall. I'm also volunteering to maintain the package in openwrt. Thanks, Jonathan Bennett Index: net/fwknop/Makefile

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Facilitating collaboration -- the labor exchange

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote: On 6/17/11 1:12 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote: As for Asterisk, it handles NAT fairly well *unless* Asterisk

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Facilitating collaboration -- the labor exchange

? ~Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] RT3052 and Telephone support

Try this one: http://www.rowetel.com/blog/ ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] how to change default IP in OpenWrt image

what you need. ~Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WR841ND v7

Juhos, is there any chance we could backport the 841nd v7 support for 10.03.1 rc5? Trunk seems to run great on it. Thanks, Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] linker errors like ignoring invalid character `#' in expression

/ hints would be appreciated. Thanks for your help, too. Thanks and Regards, Madhavi M. Dear All, It was resolved. Thanks. That's great! However, a few words of explanation might be helpful in case anyone else runs across this issue. (And I'm curious.) Regards, Madhavi M. ~Jonathan

[OpenWrt-Devel] [patch] resend: TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

This patch is refreshed for the most recent changes to trunk. It does work as intended. Please commit to trunk when possible. Cheers, Jonathan Bennett Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.37 === --- target/linux/ar71xx/config

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Resend 3 [PATCH] TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

3rd time's the charm. This patch fully supports the TP-Link tl-wa901nd v2. It removes the mii-tool dependency, cleans up the mach file just a bit, and uses the correct phy-mask. Cheers, Signed off by Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.36

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

this board. It would require a serial cable to recover. To my knowledge, everything works as intended. Cheers, Signed off by Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.36 === --- target/linux

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

on a wa901ndv2 and brings up the ethernet port if it is. There may be a better way to reset that phy chip, but this is the best I've found. Cheers, Signed off by: Jonathan Bennett jbscienc...@gmail.com Index: target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.36

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

to investigate it further, but I can't think of a way to transfer the file off the router. Cheers, Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

CONFIG_FORCEDETH=Y it to trunk/target/linux/generic/config-2.6.32 and trunk/target/linux/ar71xx/config-2.6.32. That driver isn't added to the firmware, and the actual .config file in the build directory has it unset. What am I missing to make this driver compile? ~Jonathan Bennett

[OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WA901ND V2 support

get these files online. Any ideas on the lan port? I'm assuming it's a lack of the proper driver. Any help or hints are appreciated. Cheers, Jonathan Bennett ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman