[PATCH 1/2] realtek: use vendor-specific magic for ZyXEL

2021-01-23 Thread Bjørn Mork
The stock firmware of the ZyXEL GS1900 series use a non-standard u-image magic. This is not enforced by the stock u-boot, which is why we could boot images with the default magic. The flash management application of the stock firmware will however verify the magic, and refuse any image with

[PATCH 2/2] realtek: build ZyXEL vendor firmware compatible initramfs

2021-01-23 Thread Bjørn Mork
Append a device specific version trailer used by the stock firmware upgrade application to validate firmwares. The trailer contains a list of ZyXEL firmware version numbers, which includes a four letter hardware identifier. The stock web UI requires that the current hardware matches one of the

[PATCH 0/2] realtek: support OpenWrt flashing from ZyXEL firmware

2021-01-23 Thread Bjørn Mork
Only two minor changes is required to make our initramfs image flashable from stock web UI. This allows upgrades to OpenWrt without using console access. In theory, the u-image magic could be different for the initramfs and the squashfs image, since it is not validated by u-boot and the stock

[PATCH v2 2/2] bcm4908: automatically set DEVICE_DTS from device name

2021-01-23 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
This sets the DTS paths automatically based on their device definition name. Devices where this is not possible may still be served by simply overwriting DEVICE_DTS in their respective definition. Cc: Rafał Miłecki Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler --- Changes in v2: - rebase ---

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Alberto Bursi
On 23/01/21 09:49, Paul Spooren wrote: On Sa, Jan 23, 2021 at 07:25, Alberto Bursi wrote: On 22/01/21 20:03, Daniel Golle wrote: Hi Philip, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Hi, Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: convert UniFi Outdoor+ HSR support to OF

2021-01-23 Thread Matthias Schiffer
On 1/23/21 1:58 AM, David Bauer wrote: Enable support for the Ubiquiti UniFi Outdoor+ RF filter via device-tree. The old way of using platform data is not required anymore, as it was only used on the now removed ar71xx target. Signed-off-by: David Bauer ---

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Ted Hess
On 1/23/2021 1:25:31 AM, "Alberto Bursi" wrote: On 22/01/21 20:03, Daniel Golle wrote: Hi Philip, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Hi, Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers willing to do commercial work?

[PATCH v2 1/2] bcm4908: sort and wrap build recipes

2021-01-23 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
This sorts the Build recipes alphabetically, wraps some long lines and moves the DEVICE_VARS to the top like common on several other targets. Cc: Rafał Miłecki Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler --- Changes in v2: - new patch --- target/linux/bcm4908/image/Makefile | 28

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Paul Spooren
On Sa, Jan 23, 2021 at 07:25, Alberto Bursi wrote: On 22/01/21 20:03, Daniel Golle wrote: Hi Philip, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:23:42AM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: Hi, Is anyone interested in adding a page to the openwrt.org site about developers willing to do commercial work?

RE: [PATCH 2/2] ath79: add support for Ubiquiti UniFi AP Outdoor+

2021-01-23 Thread Adrian Schmutzler
Hi, two comments below. > + leds { > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > + > + led_white: white { > + label = "blue"; > + gpios = < 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; > + > + blue { > + label =

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, I don't think this is a good idea due to legal obligations, administrative hassle, quality of work issues and so on. NACK from me. ~ Jo ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hi All, Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 18:09, Sam Kuper a écrit : > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 02:55:05PM +, Ted Hess wrote: > > [T]here must be some sort of criteria (contributions, legitimate > > business site or references) to get your name/outfit listed. And, as > > Daniel said, we don't want to

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Etienne Champetier wrote: > Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 18:09, Sam Kuper a écrit : >> I suggest that if a vote is held, it should be a three-way vote >> between the following outcomes (which should probably be mutually >> exclusive): >> >> - OpenWRT Jobs wiki

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Petr Štetiar
Ted Hess [2021-01-23 14:55:05]: Hi, > we don't want to be in the business of certifying contractors. exactly. > If we get complaints Do we want new source for a potential bad press? > their reference gets reviewed and most likely removed. You can't review business cases as patches, this is

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread John Crispin
Hi, I do not think this is a good idea. The project should remain commercially and politically independent in order to guarantee its sovereignty. Hauke gave some good pointers on how to contact individuals devs.     John ___ openwrt-devel

[PATCH] base-files: mount pstore if present

2021-01-23 Thread Brian Norris
Pstore (persistent store) can be used to stash debug information (kernel console, panics, ftrace) across reboots or crashes. If the filesystem is present, mount it. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/boot | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 02:55:05PM +, Ted Hess wrote: > [T]here must be some sort of criteria (contributions, legitimate > business site or references) to get your name/outfit listed. And, as > Daniel said, we don't want to be in the business of certifying > contractors. Those two sentences

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 1/23/21 6:07 PM, Ibrahim Tachijian wrote: What do the NACK people say is the best way to find people that is willing to do OpenWRT work ? Surely, emailing this mailing list is not enough, or? Hi, I would suggest to look into the git history of the part which interests you and write a

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 1/23/21 2:24 PM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi, I don't think this is a good idea due to legal obligations, administrative hassle, quality of work issues and so on. NACK from me. I agree with Jo. NACK from me too. Such a page will also be seen as some sort of endorsement and people could

Re: Job board support on openwrt.org?

2021-01-23 Thread Ted Hess
On 1/23/2021 11:06:53 AM, "Petr Štetiar" wrote: Ted Hess [2021-01-23 14:55:05]: Hi, we don't want to be in the business of certifying contractors. exactly. If we get complaints Do we want new source for a potential bad press? their reference gets reviewed and most likely