On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:12:15 PM UTC+1, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
> Hi Lijun,
>
> yes, this should be handled better, could you please open an Issue about
> it.
>
==> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1152 created (because we're also
seeing this)
> If you don't have an
ql bundle drags
>> along, because it is GPL licensed.
>>
>> Full background in https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-128 ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> M.
>> --
>> Michael Vorburger, Red Hat | IRC: vorburger @freenode | ~ =
>> http://vorburger.ch
3
branch, and no open issues, so perhaps also remove that version, while
we're at it?)
> regards, Achim
>
> 2018-02-28 14:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Vorburger <mi...@vorburger.ch
> >:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> would anyone have any objection to a breaking change in PAX-JDBC
a pull request proposing this, but wanted to
first double check before with you guys if anyone here had any reservations
on the license side... is embedding a BSD licensed library into a ASL
licensed project cool?
Tx,
M.
___
Michael Vorburger
http://www.vorburger.ch
Saluton paxuloj,
Pax Exam 4.11.0 has been released; more details on:
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/PAXEXAM4/2017/05/16/Pax+Exam+4.11.0+released
Feel free to RT https://twitter.com/vorburger/status/864527665847554056
Best,
M.
___
Michael Vorburger
http
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Michael Vorburger <m...@vorburger.ch>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:20 AM, <arunan.balasubramaniam@
> interlinksoftware.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> thank you for holding off. Fixes for the
happy to action any feedback regarding these two patches
>> in order to get them merged and released.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arunan
>>
>>
>> On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 2:41:02 PM UTC+1, Michael Vorburger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
Hello,
In order to be able to benefit from
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-740 in a downstream project, I would
be interested in a Pax Exam release some time. It's not super urgent, but
was hoping for maybe the next week or two.. if this fits with other ongoing
issues on
Hello,
Pax Swissbox 1.8.3 has been released; more details on:
https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/PAXSB/2017/05/08/Pax+
Swissbox+1.8.3+released
Best,
M.
___
Michael Vorburger
http://www.vorburger.ch
--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j
Christian et al,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Michael Vorburger <m...@vorburger.ch>
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Christian Schneider <
> ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote:
>
> For a release it is always good to first write on the list that you plan
&g
Hello,
I'd like to self assign https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-740 to me,
but don't seem to have the required permission in JIRA; I can only comment
... would you like to grant me higher JIRA permissions?
Tx,
M.
--
--
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org -
t any better ideas?
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> 2017-04-08 16:56 GMT+02:00 Michael Vorburger <mi...@vorburger.ch
> >:
>
>> [sorry for confusion re. ops4j VS ops4j-infra lists; all clear now, let's
>> continue discussing here then if you prefer]
>>
>>
[sorry for confusion re. ops4j VS ops4j-infra lists; all clear now, let's
continue discussing here then if you prefer]
On Saturday, April 8, 2017 at 1:33:39 PM UTC+2, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
For PAXEXAM we do also have another build system
> Circleci [1], maybe that one is easier to fix with PRs
13 matches
Mail list logo
