I hope to finish docs this week.
Just wondering: You should always be able to install a higher API
version of the logging framework inside your test if needed or why is an
update required?
Am 13.02.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Oliver Lietz:
On Tuesday 13 February 2018 13:02:26 'Christoph Läubrich'
On Wednesday 14 February 2018 10:19:01 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote:
> I hope to finish docs this week.
>
> Just wondering: You should always be able to install a higher API
> version of the logging framework inside your test if needed or why is an
> update required?
Sure, but I would hav
Hello,
I am looking to try out PAX-CDI 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT since it got a few fixes
from 1.0.0.RC2 but having problem loading it.
The feature indicates that it is using karaf.feature v1.5.0 schema but
Karaf 4.1.4 (which PAX CDI depends on) still supports up to v1.4.0.
I also tried it out on ServiceMi
Hello Tyler, I just took version from Karaf 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT...
The reason is that fixes in pax-cdi required changes in pax-web
6.1.2-SNAPSHOT (extracting "pax-web-core" feature).
And probably I should:
- downgrade to 1.4.0 version of XSD
- add pax-web-core feature to pax-web 6.0.10-SNAPSHOT
- up
