Problem solved thanks to ots
Event 1399 solved it, necessary during migrate
Regards,
Jeroen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: DENNIS WILLIAMS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: Thursday, November 20, 2003 21:46
Aan: 'Jeroen van Sluisdam'
Onderwerp: RE: ora-600 / ora-00604 during migrate
Jeroen - What priority did Oracle assign the TAR? Given the seriousness of
your situation, you should get it rated a priority 1. Is there any
possibility you can export/import your data instead of performing a
migration?
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jeroen van Sluisdam
Verzonden: donderdag 20 november 2003 21:41
Aan: 'DENNIS WILLIAMS'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Onderwerp: RE: ora-600 / ora-00604 during migrate
Dennnis,
Priority 2. I have tried export but after 3 days of experimenting
And not getting
: donderdag 20 november 2003 21:41
Aan: 'DENNIS WILLIAMS'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Onderwerp: RE: ora-600 / ora-00604 during migrate
Dennnis,
Priority 2. I have tried export but after 3 days of experimenting
And not getting results I switched to this scenario
How could I persuade them to go to priority
TOAD puts a hint in.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/28/2003 1:29:25 PM
does toad or the oracle instance itself slip in rule hints? We got an
ora-600 error off of a data dictionary read. i think it has to do with explain
plan. ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17182], [2325084336],
[], [],
What version of TOAD, Oracle server and Oracle client? See Metalink article
34779.1 for details on your bug, which may be fixed in releases 8.1.7.3,
9.0.1.2 and 9.2.0.1.
BTW, TOAD can put in hints, but more importantly, it can do some
conversion/translation of your SQL before sending it. You
ORACLE-L
does the data dictionary still use rule by support? any idea why toad would
bother slipping it in?
From: John Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/10/28 Tue PM 02:59:25 EST
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ora-600 question
TOAD puts a hint
rule by support? any idea why toad would
bother slipping it in? From: "John Shaw"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/10/28 Tue PM 02:59:25
EST To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ora-600 question
TOAD puts a hint in.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/28/2003
does the data dictionary still use rule by support? any idea why toad would bother
slipping it in?
From: John Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2003/10/28 Tue PM 02:59:25 EST
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ora-600 question
TOAD puts a hint
/10/28 Tue PM 02:59:25 EST
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ora-600 question
TOAD puts a hint in.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/28/2003 1:29:25 PM
does toad or the oracle instance itself slip in rule hints? We got an
ora-600 error off of a data dictionary
If there're already hints like ordered and use_nl that tell Oracle how to join,
lack of statistics is less of a problem. In fact, you may need to use those two
hints in some queries against data dictionary even in pre-9i Oracle.
Yong Huang
--- Tanel Poder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Just
Depending on the query, in dba_extents example there are hints only in one
part of multi-part union all SQL, but nevertheless, good point :)
Tanel.
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:04 AM
If there're
We have found the cause of the problem. If populate the varray for a row with 100
values, copy that data to a temporary table and then perform split and exchange
partition operations everything is fine. However if we populate the varray with 1000
values for a row and then perform the same
Hi!
If even Oracle hasn't seen this error, then probably we can't help much here
either. Just a wild guess, try to move this partition to another location
and select from it then (although koxsisz1 isn't a data layer error as far
as I understand). Try to read using index if available, then using
The error was first discovered when we tried to move a partition. ( alter table
archive_wave_i move partition SEP1103 tablespace CHANARCH_NLC_2003_09_DATA). The
table was renamed to OLD_archive_wave_i once it was determined that no new varray data
was accessible. My theory is that this is
Hi!
I'm on thin ice here, but I think KO means some sort of object layer (KOC is
Kernel-Object-Cache module as far as I understand), so koxsisz1 has probably
something to do with objects as well (thus not caching, x might mean execute
or transaction or anything else:). On the other hand, varrays
Ian,
I was going to recommend to try exporting your problematic partition with
direct=y, that way normal SQL query processing layer is bypassed in Oracle
kernel all data belonging to segment is read directly (thus hopefully
avoiding the koxsisz1 crash) ... but I'm not sure whether varrays don't
The varray data is stored in a LOB. So I expect direct export will not work. But
I'll give it a try.
Ian
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Ian,
I was going to recommend to try exporting your problematic
Doc ID:
Note:34782.1
Subject:
ORA-600 [17114]
KGH Bad magic
number in
header
Type:
REFERENCE
Status:
PUBLISHED
Content Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Creation Date:
29-FEB-1996
Last Revision Date:
29-OCT-2002
Note: For additional ORA-600 related information please read
[NOTE:146580.1]
Title: Message
http://tinyurl.com/njtq
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot
com All Views expressed in this email
are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod
can have facts, having an opinion is an art !
]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on.com cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ora-600
when analyzing IOT
08/07/2003 12:13
PM
Rick
Rick,
Thanks for prompt reply.
I tried it (deleting statistics before analyzing table) and it worked.
Any ideas, whether cost-based optimizer need statistics on IOT or having
statistics on PK index of IOT would be enough?
Igor Neyman, OCP DBA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
]
on.com cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ora-600 when analyzing
IOT
According to MetaLink you need to delete statistics and re-analyze
I do not know your database version but this is supposely fixed in 8.1.6
execute
Title: RE: ora-600 when analyzing IOT
Only missing data in *_TABLES is avg_row_len which, probably, can be used for estimating hash area for hash join.
Also, columns statistics will not be generated, probably more important.
Alex.
-Original Message-
Does it mean, that if I don't
cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: ora-600 when analyzing
IOT
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Roy:
This is a cut-and-paste from the Oracle TAR.
HTH,
Mike
***
For the x_$ view not able to recompile successfully:
- issue the following query and note the object_id:
SQL select object_id, object_name from dba_objects
where
Title: RE: ORA-600 [12501] Error ??
Couldn't find it on Metalink. Perhaps you should open a TAR for it?
Oracle version? Server version? Is there a trace file? Can you show us the DDL for the table including its indexes?
-Original Message-
From: Prem Khanna J [mailto:[EMAIL
Jeremy, you've been left out of the camel joke, evidently.
It will come around again. I guess pointless is better than useless :)
joe
Jeremy Pulcifer wrote:
So, Joe, are you pointless for a reason, or is there a joke I'm not
aware of.
-Original Message-
From: JOE TESTA
There is a utility called "ORA-600 Lookup
Utility" which is on Metalink which prompts you for the first argument listed in
the ORA-600 error that will give you an idea where the problem
lies.
-Original Message-From: JOE TESTA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, December
Title: RE: ORA-600 error(solution for all of them).
So, Joe, are you pointless for a reason, or is there a joke I'm not aware of.
-Original Message-
From: JOE TESTA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:29 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject
Weeny. Try using a very small magnet on your hard drive.
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 14:49, Stephane Faroult wrote:
Joe Testa wrote:
Hack the oracle kernel to fix those errors. Use your favorite binary
editor.
joe
Binary editors are for sissies. You probably can do it with cat and
Seema - I used the ORA-600 lookup function on metalink, but it said nothing
had yet been published on this error. Your best choice may be to file a TAR.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:33 PM
To:
Check the trace file or can u send the trace file
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi
I am having following error message in alert log on standby database at time
of recovery.
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments:
Hack the oracle kernel to fix those errors. Use your favorite binary
editor.
joe
Seema Singh wrote:
Hi
I am having following error message in alert log on standby database
at time of recovery.
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3020], [46191421], [1],
[8439], [18903], [16], [], []
Joe Testa wrote:
Hack the oracle kernel to fix those errors. Use your favorite binary
editor.
joe
Binary editors are for sissies. You probably can do it with cat and sed.
--
Regards,
Stephane Faroult
Oriole Software
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Beth - Interesting. I pasted your argument into the ORA-600 lookup function
on MetaLink and received the message:
Description for this argument is not yet published. Your request is
recorded and will be used for publishing prioritization.
Looks like you're right out there on the bleeding
Hi,
Upload your trace file to iOraBugFinder at
http://www.ubTools.com/products/iorahanganalyzer/iorahanganalyzer.html
regards...
DENNIS WILLIAMS wrote:
Beth - Interesting. I pasted your argument into the ORA-600 lookup function
on MetaLink and received the message:
Description for this
Vladimir Barac - posao wrote:
Good morning / afternoon/ evening (depending on your position)...
Alert log has following lines...
Tue Jun 25 10:07:30 2002
Errors in file E:\Oracle\admin\vurs\bdump\vursSNP2.TRC:
ORA-12012: error on auto execute of job 123
ORA-12008: error in snapshot
Hi,
Upload your trace file to iOraBugFinder at
http://www.ubtools.com/products/iorabugfinder/iorabugfinder.html .
regards...
Vladimir Barac - posao wrote:
Good morning / afternoon/ evening (depending on your position)...
Alert log has following lines...
Tue Jun 25 10:07:30 2002
Errors
Hi.
This error signals a potential data corruption, but, examine the other
messages for a more complete description of the problem.
about the ora-12008
A number of events could cause this problem, among them the following: The
master table no longer exists.
A column was added to the master
Better look again.
I got 4 hits on 'ora-600 ktbdchk1'
Jared
Vladimir Barac - posao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/01/2002 02:53 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
This is an error that occurred while recovering from a rolled back
transaction. Not a database recovery.
This could be caused by doing a control-c while trying to truncate a
large table (Bug 1400739 fixed in 8.1.7.1). Could also be from an undo
operation on a leaf key of a bitmap index. You
Hi Micheal,
Thanks, I would do that
cheers,
Ravi
--- Michael P Sale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an error that occurred while recovering from
a rolled back
transaction. Not a database recovery.
This could be caused by doing a control-c while
trying to truncate a
large table (Bug
Hi,
Add event=10015 trace name context forever, level 10 to init.ora and
restart db. A trace will be dumped which shows some rbs headers before and
after recovery.
can you email it ?
Nalla Ravi wrote:
Dear All,
I am gettying the follwoing error on our alert_log
file,though no porblem in
When I found the ORA 600 form, I opened the frame in its own window and
bookmarked the URL. No need to look up the associated note first.
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=NOTid=153788.1blackframe=0
-Chris
From: Nalla Ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Ravi - I'm assuming you want the ORA-600 Argument Lookup feature. It appears
to be associated with Note:153788.1. I can click on the link and get the
screen to appear, but it doesn't update the address part of the browser, so
I don't know how to give you specific directions. If you search for
Hi Dennis,
Thanks you so much I got that.
Cheers,
Ravi
--- DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ravi - I'm assuming you want the ORA-600 Argument
Lookup feature. It appears
to be associated with Note:153788.1. I can click on
the link and get the
screen to appear, but it doesn't
Vivek:
Oracle Support is right. THis is a typical LGWR problem.
The first thing you should do is.. You need to reduce the size of Log Buffer
(it should be in KBs..
NEVER configure log buffer in MBs)
Try setting log buffer in KBs.
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
Bangalore, INDIA
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: ORA-600 Error
Hi Catherine,
Depending on your version, and whether you have set the
system profile
'Sign-On:Audit Level' to FORMS, you should be able
Hi Catherine,
Depending on your version, and whether you have set the system profile
'Sign-On:Audit Level' to FORMS, you should be able to view current online
forms users using
SELECT USER_NAME, USER_FORM_NAME, RESPONSIBILITY_NAME, TIME, PID
FROM APPS.FND_SIGNON_AUDIT_VIEW order by user_name
: Mohammad Rafiq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Thursday, February 14, 2002 11:54 AM
Para: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Asunto: Re: ORA-600 [1158] on 8.1.7
With every parchset they provide list of fixes in readme file. You can check
it before downloading or applying patches
With every parchset they provide list of fixes in readme file. You can check
it before downloading or applying patches...However, it is better to go to
8.1.7.2 which has lot of fixes...
Regards
Rafiq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup ... for me most of the time it doesn't look-up anything
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.
QOTD:
Interesting, thanks for the link.
Jared
HAWKINS, JAMES W
just out of curiosity, what flavor of Unix?
What are your dlm lock conversion statistics?
what are your OS kernel settings for udp buffers at?
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 6:10 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hello,
Anyone out there having fun on
Ross,
The HP info for one of the two nodes is, HP-UX proteus B.11.00 U 9000/800.
As to the conversion stats, how do I determine/obtain those ?
I'll have to get the kernal setting tomorrow; I'm working from home today,
so no hard-copy.
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001
hmmm..HP
do a man -k dlm and find something
like 'dlmstats'. It'll be a 'big' command
with lots of cmd line flags. That should
get/find you lock up/down converts.
Go to the specifics from there. Expect to
find most of your converts are from null
to shared, or vice versa...then, an order
Paul, I missed your original thread on this problem,
but I suggest you call support. The problem you are
seeing may be related to bug# 2009263.
I am making some assumptions that you are running on
HP 64bit and you are running on either 8.1.6 or 8.1.7.
There are some little things you might need
Raj,
You didn't tell me the Oracle Version. So I would assume this is most
current version.
Your error OERI:4427 is a transaction layer component internal error.
By any chance you are using 2 phase commits (or ditributed
transactions) in thiese databases? or database resource manager ?
---
Sorry I didn't mention this before, this is 9.0.1.0.0 and I am not sure
about any distributed transactions I'll check that though ... BTW all three
instances of errors are on COMMIT statement.
Thanks for the clue ...
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni
oracle's
answer will be patch to 8.1.7.2, thats what we were told just recently on a
different ora-600 error. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/20/01 10:45AM
And yes, I've got a TAR logged with Oracle on
this, but I wonder if any of you have
seen anything like this before. Whenever we try to query
any
Title: ORA-600 when querying DBA_SOURCE, ALL_SOURCE.
Works
OK with 8.1.7 on Win2K.. What do all you unix bigots think of that then
G :P
Mark
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas JeffSent:
Thursday, September 20, 2001
ÌÌÌ
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We had the same thing not too long ago. Turned out to be a corrupt index
block. You might try running DBVerify on all the datafiles. It will tell
you if something is wrong.
Ron Smith
Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 12:51 PM
First:
Searching metalink (http://metalink.oracle.com) for ORA-07445
dredseek() will return 3 hits,
including the OWWS reply ...this could be bug:1095728.
Searching on ORA-00600 [12700] returned 39 hits.
Check it out. Fill out an iTar. Hound OWWS incessantly until you have
a solution.
Good
this an internal error of oracle ,you must send your database and the error
ora600 with his arguments to your oracle provider.
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:50 AM
Hi
I have oracle8.1.7 on Solaris
Mario,
You mean to say he should send database to the oracle provider ;)
--- Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this an internal error of oracle ,you must send your database and the
error
ora600 with his arguments to your oracle provider.
=
Have a nice day !!
It is an error of latch contention. IT IS NOT AN
CORRUPTION ERROR. Maybe in those times when the error
occurred you were experimenting some sort extent pool
latch contention. Therefore identify for the next time
identify which session is causing the contention and
what it is running with
Raghu:
What I have found suggests that you are having latch contention on the SORT
EXTENT POOL.
The 510 indicates that a call was made to free a latch that is unowned.
The second parameter is the address for that latch. The third argument is
the type of child latch that the kernel was trying to
Thankyou very jon.
From: Jon Walthour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ora-600 ..sort extent pool??
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 14:40:18 -0800
Raghu:
What I have found suggests that you are having latch
Thankyou very much jon.
From: Jon Walthour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ora-600 ..sort extent pool??
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 14:40:18 -0800
Raghu:
What I have found suggests that you are having latch
call support
joe
Raghu Kota wrote:
Hi Friends,
When Iam rebuilding my index and clearing TEMP tablespace frequently..that
time I got this error..Any suggestions??
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [510], [1073758876], [sort extent
poo
l], [], [], [], [], []
Thanks
Raghu.
2001 4:25 PM
To:
Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:
RE: Ora-600 : Internal error code.. Help!!!
There is a web site,
http://www.unal-bilisim.com/products/iorabugfinder/iorabugfinder.html,
that
lets you upload your trace file and
it will give you links to any relavant
info i
Oracle Product Document Library(C) Oracle Corporation
Manual: ORACLE 8.1.5 SERVER CODES Reference: A67785-01
ORA-00600 internal error code, arguments: [string], [string], [string],
[string], [string], [string], [string], [string]
Cause: This is the generic internal error number for
Hello,
did you run iOraBugFinder ?
Raj Gopalan wrote:
DBA's
I am getting following error in alert.log once in two days.
on Jun 11 09:26:11 2001
Errors in file
/export/home/u01/app/oracle/admin/orcl/udump/orcl_ora_6342.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [12333], [111],
There is a web site,
http://www.unal-bilisim.com/products/iorabugfinder/iorabugfinder.html, that
lets you upload your trace file and it will give you links to any relavant
info it can find on the subject. You might want to try it.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:07
Title: RE: Ora-600 : Internal error code.. Help!!!
OK. What is unal-bilisim, it sounds like it's kinda disgusting. But what do I know.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Lange [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject
Title: RE: Ora-600 : Internal error code.. Help!!!
Lisa;
According to their web site:
Unal Bilisim is an organization which is
specialized in Oracle Database. It's located in Adana/Turkey.
Unal Bilisim
Thank you Deshpande,
It's nice to hear good results.
I genarally recommend search depth=1. Search depth=0 may return a lot of bugs
and it may take time to find which one is yours.
And,
You may not see all bugs. It depends on your license and bug status. Many bugs
are un-published(not only
Kevin,
ORA-600's and ORA-7445's are very similar in some
respects in that they are related to the death of a
process.
ORA-600's are essentially exception handlers so there
are literally thousands of different ORA-600's. Some
errors are signaled in only one situation, others can
occur in
I worked with RDBMS support in Oracle Denmark for far too many years, and I'm
not that scared of 600's anymore. To provoke a bit, I find that they are in
general harmless, and then in some cases indicate serious stuff.
When looking at Oracle source code, you will (if you ever get the chance :) )
Hi,
It generally means Contat Oracle Support.
You may try to have your alert log file scanned at
http://www.unal-bilisim.com/products/iorabugfinder/iorabugfinder.html. Set
Search Depth to 0.
Very nice little tool from Unal Bilisim. I used it a few times with good
results.
HTH
Regards,
-
It means that you should be calling 1-800-223-1711 and have your CSI ready
instead of having fun on this mailing list..
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi Friends
What does it mean??
ORA-00600: internal error code,
Well, is the answer for all ORA 600's, I have noticed there are different
ones. One of my fellow employees just called me and told me that the
production instance at a clients site just went down with ORA 600. He said
that it said in paren's, (with complications). Now what in the good lords
Raghu,
as Mladen said .. it means that u have hit an oracle bug.. generally the
first parameter tells Oracle what code path encountered the bug. Other
parameters are specific and relavant measures that might vary based on what
the first parameter is. In addition, ora-600 is accompanied by a
Ora-600 . thats the new race where they make you run around sending
them this and that 600 times before they tell you we have no Idea.
Its the Oracle Catch-All error. Call Support. They will probably want to
see any dump or trace files generated.
-Original Message-
Sent:
ora-600 is a severe error and the codes in parens are debugging codes for
Oracle Support
CALL SUPPORT when you get an ora-600 and ora-7445
From: Kevin Kostyszyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ora-600
Date
Hi,
it's a a good news...
and,
It's not possible to suggest a bug number. but, bugs are ordered by
metalink's score. to narrow down problem, select high level search depth and
read high scores first.
Rajesh Dayal wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
Yes you are quite right on this. SHMMAX had
Zabair
I have no idea of argument 17090 but 15212 appeared on our database last
week. We have HP-UNIX 11.0.32 with 8.1.6.2. If you check on metalink
it says something wrong with PL/SQL code with undetermined reason.
You may check on metalink with your complete error code.
Regards
Rafiq
Kevin,
I have the same problem with 8.1.6 on NT.
It's probably this bug :
Bug No. 1365873
Filed 27-JUL-2000 Updated 25-FEB-2001
Product Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition V7 Product Version 8.1.6.1.2
Platform Generic Platform Version
I looked it up on metaslow and apperantly it will not be fixed until
8.1.7.2.
-Original Message-
(Frank)
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 5:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Kevin,
I have the same problem with 8.1.6 on NT.
It's probably this bug :
92 matches
Mail list logo
