I guess Dick really meant 'paper weight', a rather large, bulky and ugly one and the
only paper weight that needs to be reboot twice a day to hold your papers steady.
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
I'm confused:
did you REALLY expect anything
out of microslop to work according
to expectation?
Cheers
Nuno Souto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
Dick,
What kind of a nautical person are you??? the NT box will not even
make a good anchor because the sides are flat and it will
Now now all you MS bigots. Just leave us alone. There are several of us on
this list who are forced into using MS because of management decisions. And
our systems are running just fine.
Just leave us alone. You don't see us posting all of the other op systems
problems (all 2 of them).
thank
Nuno Souto scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
I'm confused:
did you REALLY expect anything
out of microslop to work according
to expectation?
you just have to remember to take the cover off when using it as an
anchor.;-)
--
Bill Shrek Thater ORACLE DBA
I'm going to work my
Well, since my usage of my boat is primarily for fishing, I really like Lake trout
Pickerel, an anchor that drags smoothly is a benefit. Besides that old Windoze OS
adds a lot of weight to the system. *-)
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-Original Message-
Sent:
True, but some of use linux to manage those databaeses on MS.
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 04:44, Mercadante, Thomas F wrote:
Now now all you MS bigots. Just leave us alone. There are several of us on
this list who are forced into using MS because of management decisions. And
our systems are
Citrix Metaframe, rdesktop, and TightVNC help a bunch, too. :)
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of
Yes, I find it highly amusing that the Linux client
for Windows Terminal Services (rdesktop) is in some
ways easier to use than the Windows client.
Have not had need for TightVNC. How do you use it?
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 07:09, Jesse, Rich wrote:
Citrix Metaframe, rdesktop, and TightVNC help a
Jared,
I'm not into TightVNC just yet, but I do use VNC. It's damned nice over a
dial up line as there is less chatter between the server the client. I also prefer
it over PCAnyWhere as it runs in less memory. Much easier to set up as well. OH,
BTW; did anyone mention that it's
http://www.tightvnc.org It's VNC, but with compression levels that can be
set by the server and/or client. I use it to access my Windoze box here at
work from my Gentoo desktop and while VPN'd into work from home. Even
though it's not a server, my Windoze box has some tools on it that I'm
Rich,
Citrix Metaframe, rdesktop, and TightVNC help a
bunch, too. :)
opinion
This is the biggest reason why people badmouth Windows
for use with Oracle. You install Citrix MetaFrame on
the same server as you run Oracle Database Server? Get
real.
You probably have IIS, RRAS, IPSec, numerous
Ugh ... you mentioned disable all that crap ... but that included windows .. no? That
would solve a lot of problems ... right?
sorry, I am in an exceptionally good mood today just because computer room woke me up
at 3:30am to fix something!! Aah... the joys of being on-call.
Raj
We had some issues with using a TightVNC client
against vnc server v3.3.7, whereby the server process
would crash and not restart, requiring a server
reboot. So TightVNC got tossed as a client in our
environment.
Its nice to have Terminal Services enabled so that one
can attempt to restart a
Actually, no. If we had any Oracle servers on Windohs, I would only feel
comfortable with TightVNC server on it, and even then I would insist on no
more than 800x600 and 256 colors (hopefully the Installer works with that!),
due to the transmission overhead involved.
And if you can set up an
Jesse wrote
As far as business requirements go, we have a requirement
for a certain amount of uptime and reliability. Oracle7 on
Windohs could satisfy neither, and have no need to spend
money to re-investigate this for newer versions of Oracle/Windohs.
What would that 'certain amount' be.
Like I implied, we had issues running Oracle7 on Windohs NT4.0. Those
issues were frequent ORA-600s and corruption, if I remember correctly. We
moved those DBs to Unix and the problem was solved. Granted, this was
Oracle7, but like I said, I see no need to spend money to re-investigate the
cost
--- Jesse, Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I implied, we had issues running Oracle7 on
Windohs NT4.0. Those
issues were frequent ORA-600s and corruption, if I
remember correctly. We
moved those DBs to Unix and the problem was solved.
snip
Jesse:
new hardware.
new OS.
new oracle
Look on the Documentation CD for the upgrade manual. Safest way would be to 1) get a
Linux box, 2) do a FULL DB export. 3) Create new DB on the Linux server Import the
data there. 4) Use the old NT box as a boat anchor or upgrade it to Linux.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i
patch guide that comes with the patch set, for extended reading check
out the migration guide, oracle docs or on technet.oracle.com
joe
Hamid Alavi wrote:
Dear List,
I want to upgrade from 8.1.5 to 8.1.7 on windows 2000 what's the safest way
to do this upgrade.
If any body knows any url or
Dick,
What kind of a nautical person are you??? the NT box will not even
make a good anchor because the sides are flat and it will drag on the
bottom during a small wind or current.
Ron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/05/2004 12:39:36 PM
Look on the Documentation CD for the upgrade manual. Safest way
Dennis:
Thanks for the information. I pretty much have these items in mind, what
I'm looking for are some things that I may have missed. I'm interviewing
for an Oracle DBA position and they have a big project starting after the
first of the year to move / upgrade their Oracle application / DB
Patchset 2376472
Regards,
Gudmundur
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Oracle DBA
Sent: 25. september 2003 21:00
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Upgrade from 8.1.7.3 to 8.1.7.4
Hi List,
We have 8.1.7.3
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_gui.startup
metalink
top tech docs
upgrade and migration
KENNETH JANUSZ
Thanks Mike, but this won't work. I'm not a member of Metalink.
Ken
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:44 AM
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_gui.startup
metalink
top tech docs
: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:00 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Upgrade Plans
Thanks Mike, but this won't work. I'm not a member of Metalink.
Ken
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
Ken
Having gone through this numerous times, I don't think there is such a
thing as a detailed plan that has any use beyond the immediate task. I would
concentrate first of all on your philosophical approach, the principles on
which you work. Here are some ideas:
- Create a staging/QA server
Title: Message
AFAIK,
Migrate can't go directly from 7 to 9 you'll need an Oracle 8 in
between.
I'd do
export/import if it's at all possible.
Jack
-Original Message-From: Jeroen van
Sluisdam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,
August 25, 2003 1:10 PMTo: Multiple
Yes, after installing HP-UX 11.11 , you need Oracle 7.3.4 for that version.
As you are on migration path
you can request Oracle Support to provide that version binaries. After
installing OS and Oracle binaries, you should copy over your
Datafiles/contoldfiles and redologs and after setting env
Mladen you're crackin me up, dude! That looks good except for the
reading part...
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
No, that's the wrong way. The right way is to read first 3 pages, then
try it out, using your production
Title: Message
See
doc ID 214887.1
-Original Message-From: AK
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 5:54
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
upgrade to 9i
Hi
where can I find steps ( procedure ) for
upgrading from 8.1.7 to 9i .
I'd also suggest that you read the migration guide before you do any
upgrade.
RF
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 7/30/2003 8:09 AM
See doc ID 214887.1
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 5:54 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
No, that's the wrong way. The right way is to read first 3 pages,
then try it out, using your production database, naturally, and
when it fails, ask the questions on this list. Do not forget to
put something like *** NEED URGENT HELP *** in the message subject,
because that gives me an adrenaline
If its
not an then you can simply run catalog.sql and catproc.sql to upgrade oracle
dictionary tables. Also during 9I installation Oracle ask to upgrade
existing databases on that system.
-Original Message-From: AK
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:54
AK,
Start with Note:159657.1 on
MetaLink.
Gudmundur
- Original Message -
From:
AK
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:54
PM
Subject: upgrade to 9i
Hi
where can I find steps ( procedure ) for
upgrading from 8.1.7
Are you missing something in your reply?
If its not an then.
From migrating 8.1.7 to 9i, one has to follow prescribed procedure.
To my knowledge one needs to run u0801070.sql after starting the 8i database in
'migrate'
mode...etc.. etc... I have the GUI thing, sorry!
- Kirti
--- [EMAIL
I have a few databases in Home0 and a few in Home1 and need to move one from
Home0 to Home1
So if I understand correct I can do:
Oradim -delete -sid SID
Remove the entries that look like
ORA_SID_AUTOSTART
ORA_SID_SHUTDOWN
ORA_SID_SHUTDOWNTYPE
ORA_SID_SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT
From Home0(if not done by
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Upgrade 8.1.7.3.0 to 8.1.7.4.1 on W2K
I have a few databases in Home0 and a few in Home1 and need to move one
from
Home0 to Home1
So if I understand
Try telling it very nicely. :)
Try looking in the registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE.
You can change the home location of the appropriate instance (HOME0, HOME1,
etc.) there. Change it in the main Oracle directory then in the individual
HOME(n) folder.
I hope this helps.
Assuming that you are changing the second Oracle Home, ie. Home1.
Change the following entries in the registry:
HKLM\Software\Oracle\ALL_HOMES\ID1\PATH
HKLM\Software\Oracle\HOME1\ORACLE_HOME
Depending on how you've located init and dump files, etc., you
may see other entries in
Title: Upgrade gotchas - 8.1.7.4->9.2.0.3 on Windows
Lisa,
Just a follow-up question.
I've set the ORA_SID_PFILE parameter in
the
registry, but do not use a password file.
When I start up the database it looks for the
PFILE in the default directory instead of the
path
specified in the
We had the same problem upgrading from 8.1.6 to 9.2.0.
The problem is that you can not upgrade from 8.1.6 but have to install 8.1.7
or 9.0.1, do an upgrade and then install and upgrade to 9.2.0. We decided
to do export/import while converting to locally managed TS with uniform
extents.
Yechiel
We're running Oracle 8.0.5 for 3 years now
and want to go to Oracle9i.
Should I
a) upgrade OR
b) exp the db and do an install of 9i then imp
(this is a lenghty process)
what say you? TIA.
Joe
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Leyden, Joseph
INET:
Joseph.
I prefer to exp/imp when possible. You get a chance to change anything
you like. With 8.0.5, you may have to upgrade in two steps. You could test
the exp/imp on your test system and get an idea of how much system downtime
your users would experience. Then ask them if that would be
Hi Jack:
the answer to your second question is yes, because you only have one DB,
;-).
about you first question there are some platforms on which the distribution
of binaries to all the nodes goes wrong but with 8.1.7.4 on tru64 it doesn't
( as far as I know ;-))
You will be pretty safe if you
I assume that the existing 8.1.7.0 environment is already running OPS.
In that case, the 8.1.7.4 patchset should apply successfully.
If it is a TruCluster 5.x or higher, it would be a Cluster File System, in
which
case it would most probably be a single ORACLE_HOME shared by both nodes.
[I have a
Hello Gurus
We are in process of planning to upgrade our existing Oracle Financials 10.7
Character Applications to 11i( ver 11.5.8)
Existing env
HP-UX 11.00 32bits
Oracle Financials 10.7 Char
with Manufacturing Bill of Material
Some customization (of Forms Reports)
No middle tier
Database
We did something very close to this in November of last year. We have
the same OS and hardware. We were also character mode however we
differed in that we used GEMMS for process manufacturing rather than
discrete manufacturing in Oracle. We also had some customization. Our
database was a
us know what Oracle support has to say.
Cheers!
- Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Joan Hsieh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Upgrade to AIX 5.2
Kirti,
I did some home work toward our near
Thomas,
I think you will find this in either in the upgrade manual or MetaLink.
IIRC it depends on the number of DD objects, but I can't recall where
it was that I read that.
Jared
Thomas Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/31/2003 10:34 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
Jared - I agree with you. My understanding is that an Oracle upgrade just
changes the data dictionary. An Oracle migration (like Oracle 7 to Oracle 8)
involves changes to the tablespaces.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent:
Oracle 7 to Oracle 8 involves changes to the rowid itself. Hence the
tablespaces are part of migration. For higher releases , the changes
take place to the system , rbs tablespaces (if i recall correctly) and
the user tablespaces are not touched by migration.
HTH
GovindanK
=
DENNIS
Kirti,
I did some home work toward our near future upgrading from aix 4.3.3 to
5.1 and 817.4-32 bit to 9i2-64 bit. (8 servers) Note:206569.1 and
Note:223521.1 on which said
-When running oracle8i 32-bit on aix 5l, the machine must be booted
with the
32-bit kernel. this restriction doesn't
Joan,
From what I have found Oracle 9.2 64-bit can be run in a 32-bit mode on AIX 5L.
So, one can have 5L running Oracle 8.1.7.4 and 9.2.0 in 32-bit modes. However, the
H/W running AIX must be 64-bit.
Please see note # 169426.1.
Let us know what Oracle support has to say.
Cheers!
-
So it appears that Oracle 8.1.7 databases and 9.2 databases can not
co-exist on the same server, i.e. AIX 4.3.3 32 bit. If this is the case,
then all databases on the server must be upgraded at the same time?
Current Env: AIX 4.3.3 32 bit Oracle 8.1.7
Proposed Env: AIX 5.2 64 bit Oracle 9.2
: vrijdag 28 februari 2003
15:04To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: Upgrade to AIX 5.2
So it appears that Oracle 8.1.7 databases and 9.2 databases can not
co-exist on the same server, i.e. AIX 4.3.3 32 bit. If this is the case,
then all databases on the server must
-Original Message-From: Gene Sais
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003
8:04 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
RE: Upgrade to AIX 5.2
So it appears that Oracle 8.1.7 databases and 9.2 databases can not
co-exist on the same server, i.e. AIX 4.3.3
Hey... we are in the same boat... except I have to migrate our Apps to
9.2.0.2 to get us there...
From what I UNDERSTAND... (ie... from what I finally drug out of Metalink
analyst)... you will probably need to install the 9.2 binaries for 5L (it is
the only different set that I have been able to
Hi
It's been a while since I talked about this with the Unix guy at my previous
assignment, but I think you MUST upgrade to 9i.
Jack
-Original Message-
Sent: donderdag 27 februari 2003 11:45
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
As AIX 4.3.3 goes out of service this year, we need
Certification matrix says 817 terminal release is certified, as is 9.2
April Wells
Oracle DBA
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds
-- Albert Einstein
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:34 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Certify - Additional Info Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition Version 8.1.7
(8i) On IBM AIX -Based Systems
Operating System: IBM AIX -Based Systems Version 5.2 (5L)
Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition Version 8.1.7
My understanding was that if AIX 5L was run in 64bit mode then Oracle 9i
Release 2 was the first release supported, but if not running AIX 5 in
64bit mode then previous version of Oracle would be OK.
But maybe I am confused?
John
-Original Message-
Sent: 27 February 2003 11:34
To:
So 8.1.7 is supported on AIX 5L provided AIX is booted in 32 bit mode???
John
-Original Message-
Sent: 27 February 2003 12:24
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Certify - Additional Info Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition Version 8.1.7
(8i) On IBM AIX -Based Systems
It appears that way. We are also pondering on this upgrade as well.
But if one takes this route, that is, running 5L in 32-bit mode, one can not install
9i on the same server. And Oracle has not certified 8.1.7 64-bit on AIX 5L. It is not
planned to be available, either.
So, we are leaning
It looks like that is what it is saying... I am planning on upgrade to
9.2.0.2 ASAP.
April Wells
Oracle DBA
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds
-- Albert Einstein
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:09 AM
To: Multiple
I thought that you had to have Oracle 9 release 2 if running AIX 5 in 64bit
mode, not the other way around.
We have a customer who is intending to run Oracle 9i Release 2 on AIX 5
running in 32bit kernel mode. Can anyone say for definate whether this will
work or not?
John
-Original
John/Kirti,
We are in the same boat with you. However, we were looking to first upgrade to
AIX 5L first and leave our existing 8.1.7 32-bit databases (booting the server
in 32 bit mode). In a subsequent phase we would upgrade 8.1.7 32-bit to 9.2
64-bit. The downside to this is that it will
I am testiing 9iR2 on aix 5.2 now. We will be going to
64bit when we upgrade all databases. It seems fine to me.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From:
April Wells
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:29
AM
Subject: RE: Upgrade
Tracy,
We are still debating this issue with our preferred App Vendor...
Since there is no 64-bit 8.1.7.4 on AIX 5L, upgrading to 9i is what we will pursue.
Testing the Vendor App on 9i/AIX 4.3.3 should not take considerable amount of time,
as *none* of the new features of 9i would be used
Upgrade 8.1.6 to 8.1.7 and then apply the patch. Read
the docs carefully before applying the patch it is an
ugly puppy.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im doing an upgrade from 8.1.6. to 8.1.7.4.
Is there any benfit of doing the upgrade from 8.1.6
to 8.1.7, using
ODMA then patching to
Patch first then upgrade.
Dick Goulet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 1/25/03 8:38 pm:
Im doing an upgrade from 8.1.6. to 8.1.7.4. Is there any benfit of doing the
upgrade from 8.1.6 to 8.1.7, using ODMA then patching to 8.1.7.4
or
installing 8.1.7, patch it to 8.1.7.4, then ODMA the database from
The last time I went through the documentation from Oracle on doing an
upgrade. Planning for one of my 8.1.6.3 to be upgraded to 8.1.7 the
installation manual and Metalink's articles on upgrading specifically called
for the migration to be done (for all instances that were to be migrated)
first,
Im doing an upgrade from 8.1.6. to 8.1.7.4.
Is there any benfit of doing the upgrade from 8.1.6 to 8.1.7, using
ODMA then patching to 8.1.7.4
or
installing 8.1.7, patch it to 8.1.7.4, then ODMA the database from
8.1.6.
any other comments on this upgrade path are welcomed
thanks
Sam
--
What I would do is create a separate 8.1.7.4 OH. I'd then start the 8.1.6
database under 8.1.7.4 and apply the upgrade scripts. Of course, I'd backup
my 8.1.6 database before I did any of this.
Cheers!
RF
-Original Message-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:39 PM
To:
Thanks for your reply.
Now I know whom to contact..for upgrades :)
Cyril
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 Bowes, Chris wrote :
A valid question. With a pseudo-valid answer, which is: Because
there is no
8i for hp-ux 10.20. We have been asking for upgrades and all for
the last
4+ years and the
sorry for not being 'directly relevant'
But I was just wondering why
you were upgrading from 7.3.4 to 8.0.6
(and then having to upgrade to 9.2)
when Oracle has provided for an upgrade path
from 7.3.4 to 9.2
Can you please let me know your reason
for upgrading to 8.0.6
Thanks
Cyril
On
MetaLink article #144804.1 describes the process of migration from Oracle7
to Oracle9i...
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:13 AM
sorry for not being 'directly relevant'
But I was just wondering why
Title: RE: RE: Upgrade from 7.3.4 to 8.0.6
A valid question. With a pseudo-valid answer, which is: Because there is no 8i for hp-ux 10.20. We have been asking for upgrades and all for the last 4+ years and the management answer is do nothing until SAP is completed. SAP was started in 1996
So, did you have Replication setup in Oracle7 ?
Reading Note:51119.1 Performing Command Line Migration with MIG80 (Version 7 to 8.0)
..
after opening the database OPEN RESETLOGS and running
CAT8000.sql, CATREP8M.sql is to be run ONLY if you
previously ran CATREP.sql under Oracle7.
If you did
Are you calling the catrep8m script directly ? Or is it being
called
from some other script [eg catproc.sql ?].
Are you using Advanced Replication ?
Hemant
At 02:28 PM 20-01-03 -0800, you wrote:
Hi everyone!
Has anyone seen this and know a solution? I am upgrading a base from 7.3.4 to 8.0.6.
or needed recovery, the base would be
dead.
Any
thoughts?
Thank
you again,
--Chris
-Original Message-From: Hemant K Chitale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003
8:55 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Re: Upgrade from 7.3.4
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
Upgrade from 7.3.4 to 8.0.6 - Possible Solution - Comments?
I
found a way around the problem. I don't think Oracle will like
it...
I
hunted down the offending table that was missing the column DELIVERY_ORDER and
added it to that dictionary table. I then re
My understanding is that 8.1.7.3 is the buggy one. It was supposed to be
the terminal 8.1.7 release but it had so many problems they had to come out
with 8.1.7.4
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
DBA's
I have to
Speaking of the recursion, now 8.1.7.4 has some serious problmes,
especially on HP-UX 11/64 with OPS.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: upgrade 8.1.6.2
some serious problmes,
especially on HP-UX 11/64 with OPS.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 3:58 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: upgrade 8.1.6.2 to 8.1.7.3 or 8.1.7.4
My understanding
What OS?
eg if W2K I have had to stop the Distributed Transaction Coordinator Service before
the patch could be applied (otherwise files were locked).
(This applies to any Oracle patch for me)
Also, if Windows note that there is an 81745 patch.
Have you looked at Metalink
Yes. On Compaq TRU64 there is a bug. I believe # 2462125.
-Rich
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:38 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi there.
Has anyone picked up any problems while installing the 8.1.7.4 patch?
I am going from 8.1.7.0 to 8.1.7.4 and
Sorry, I meant to say a bug with the listener.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 7:53 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Yes. On Compaq TRU64 there is a bug. I believe # 2462125.
-Rich
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:38 AM
To:
]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:33 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Upgrade to 8.1.7.4?
What OS?
eg if W2K I have had to stop the Distributed Transaction Coordinator Service
before the patch could be applied (otherwise files were locked).
(This applies
Hi
I upgraded my server from 8.1.7.0 to 8.1.7.4.1 on july and still now
there
is no problem at all.
Thanks
Shibu
Oracle DBA
Acusis
-Original Message-
Naude
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:08 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi there.
Has anyone picked up any
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Upgrade to 8.1.7.4?
What OS?
eg if W2K I have had to stop the Distributed Transaction Coordinator Service
before the patch could be applied (otherwise files were locked).
(This applies to any Oracle patch for me)
Also, if Windows
-Original Message-
From: M B Shibu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Upgrade to 8.1.7.4?
Hi
I upgraded my server from 8.1.7.0 to 8.1.7.4.1 on july and still now
there
is no problem
We are upgrading from 8161 to 92. You can export from 8161 and import into
9.2, that is supported.
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't
Thanks Raj
I know that I can import/export. I want to convert the existing DB.
Yechiel Adar
Mehish
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 8:48 PM
We are upgrading from 8161 to 92. You can export from 8161 and
:
co.uk Subject: RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Network
Connor
McDonald To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hamcdc@yahoo. cc:
co.uk Subject: RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 -
NOPE!
Sent
Cutting and pasting from an old post: by Jonathan Lewis:
The upshot of it seems to be that anyone who can get an sql session can look at
any data, and given 'create view' as well can change data at will. You may be
able to use the database in production, but only if your users can't access it
This is fixed in 9.0.1.3. I have verified it.
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Cutting and pasting from an old post: by Jonathan Lewis:
The upshot of it seems to be that anyone who can get an sql session can look
at
Did Oracle back port the patch to fix the ANSI-style jonn bug to 9.0.1.2? This bug
allows one to read any table in the database despite the permission set.
Ian MacGregor
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:23 AM
To:
I'm pretty sure this has not been done...
NOBODY(!) should be on 9012 in production - unless
you're happy with zero security. As well as the
reading-anything as Ian points out, with a little bit
of playing around its also possible to destroy any
data in the database (since a view is updatable
Igor,
In the 9.2 upgrade manual, there should be a section in the front about
preparing to upgrade and selecting your upgrade path.There should be a
table that shows which versions you can upgrade from.Does that table
list 8.1.5 as a supported version to migrate directly to 9.2?
Cherie
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
