Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-24 Thread Sukender
: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows Hi all Windows users (and others too, I'm not doing discrimination ;) ), Under Linux ( co), packages can have dependencies. Under Windows, we're far to have such an easy system. Question is: how could we redistribute efficiently the OSG

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-24 Thread Sukender
Hi Phillip, Interesting project. Thank you for going in that direction. However I'm not sure it adresses my problem. I just want: - Windows users to be able to download a game and not having to worry about anything else - Not having a huge file to download (that's just a small app) - Not taking

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-24 Thread Sukender
[I reply a to a direct mail on the mailing list - See copy of the mail below] Hi Thomas, Thank you for the info and inno link. Has someone compared inno to nullsoft installer ( http://nsis.sourceforge.net )? I guess I'll have to go and script everything (this is not the case at the moment); so

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-24 Thread Luigi Calori
Sukender ha scritto: [I reply a to a direct mail on the mailing list - See copy of the mail below] Hi Thomas, Thank you for the info and inno link. Has someone compared inno to nullsoft installer ( http://nsis.sourceforge.net )? I guess I'll have to go and script everything (this is not the

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-24 Thread Cory Riddell
Luigi Calori wrote: I think that cpack support one windows installer (do not rimember which as I really hate installers: the best one is zip: install=unzip uninstall=remove) I agree that including dll is the bet way to go, in that case, I wouls suggest to include alsoMSVC runtime with the

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-24 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Sukender, On this subject I won't offer much input, because IMHO on Windows it's up to the application developer to make sure their app can find all its dependencies. How you do it is up to you. One option I'd like to point out that you didn't seem to have in your list is that there

[osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-23 Thread Sukender
Hi all Windows users (and others too, I'm not doing discrimination ;) ), Under Linux ( co), packages can have dependencies. Under Windows, we're far to have such an easy system. Question is: how could we redistribute efficiently the OSG binaries (I mean when not linking statically) alongside

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-23 Thread Philip Taylor
??!! -- oops age showing) PhilT -Original Message- From: osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org [mailto:osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org]on Behalf Of Sukender Sent: 23 February 2009 23:51 To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows Hi

Re: [osg-users] Packaging distribution under Windows

2009-02-23 Thread Philip Lowman
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Sukender suky0...@free.fr wrote: Hi all Windows users (and others too, I'm not doing discrimination ;) ), Under Linux ( co), packages can have dependencies. Under Windows, we're far to have such an easy system. Question is: how could we redistribute