> Hi Ian,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stokes, Ian
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 12:37 AM
> > To: Kevin Traynor ; Ophir Munk
> > ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: Olga Shern ; Ilya Maximets
> >
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] netdev-dpdk: support port representors
> >
> > > On
On 01/16/2019 10:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/01/2019 11:03, Ophir Munk:
>> Hi Kevin and thank you for your comments.
>> Please see inline...
>>
>> From: Kevin Traynor
>>> On 01/15/2019 09:47 AM, Ophir Munk wrote:
Dpdk port representors were introduced in dpdk versions 18.xx.
> Port rx queues that have not been statically assigned to PMDs are
> currently assigned based on periodically sampled load measurements.
> The assignment is performed at specific instances – port addition, port
> deletion, upon reassignment request via CLI etc.
>
> Due to change in traffic
> Conditional EMC insert helps a lot in scenarios with high numbers of
> parallel flows, but in current implementation this option affects all the
> threads and ports at once. There are scenarios where we have different
> number of flows on different ports. For example, if one of the VMs
>
"Stokes, Ian" writes:
>> Dpdk port representors were introduced in dpdk versions 18.xx.
>> Prior to port representors there was a one-to-one relationship between an
>> rte device (e.g. PCI bus) and an eth device (referenced as dpdk port id in
>> OVS). With port representors the relationship
"Iyengar, Prashanth" writes:
> From fc0a9e1329573692c04438370f85e87125a268b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Prashanth Iyengar
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:53:11 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix OpenFlow v1.3.4 Conf test failures: 430.500, 430.510
>
> This commit adds additional verification to
> On 12/12/2018 22:18, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > From: Sugesh Chandran
> >
> > Currently devices that do not support configuring flow control via the
> > eth_dev API (e.g. SRIOV VFs) will fail during configuration setup when
> > the interface is added even if flow control is not requested. This is
>
On 20.11.2018 19:19, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Conditional EMC insert helps a lot in scenarios with high numbers
> of parallel flows, but in current implementation this option affects
> all the threads and ports at once. There are scenarios where we have
> different number of flows on different
On 09/11/2018 14:02, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Add travis builds for DPDK as a shared library.
>
> Currently the DPDK builds in travis only compile DPDK as a static library.
> With static builds in DPDK there is a risk that if a function is not
> exported then it will not be supported when DPDK is used
On 01/16/2019 11:06 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/01/2019 11:56, Kevin Traynor:
>> On 01/16/2019 10:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 16/01/2019 11:03, Ophir Munk:
Hi Kevin and thank you for your comments.
Please see inline...
From: Kevin Traynor
> On 01/15/2019 09:47
> On 16/01/2019 09:30, Anju Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
> >
> > Regards
> > Anju
>
> Hi Anju,
>
> Unfortunately, no. An RFC based on the below was proposed to the mailing
> list here [1], but no discussion / comments happened after
On 01/16/2019 11:50 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 16/01/2019 12:38, Kevin Traynor:
>> On 01/16/2019 11:06 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 16/01/2019 11:56, Kevin Traynor:
On 01/16/2019 10:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> But honestly, I doubt you need to talk about representors in this
Conditional EMC insert helps a lot in scenarios with high numbers
of parallel flows, but in current implementation this option affects
all the threads and ports at once. There are scenarios where we have
different number of flows on different ports. For example, if one
of the VMs encapsulates
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Hi Ian,
Thanks for getting back . I agree that the patch Tiago has posted in the latest
needs more testing but this is more sort of an improvement. Can we merge the
first part of the problem as addressed in
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-May/346649.html
This will
16/01/2019 12:38, Kevin Traynor:
> On 01/16/2019 11:06 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 16/01/2019 11:56, Kevin Traynor:
> >> On 01/16/2019 10:21 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> But honestly, I doubt you need to talk about representors in this patch.
> >>> The change is to support multi-ports
Following code looks like it might be wrong. I don't know much about
the way the stt infrastructure is being used, so feel free to ignore if
it is expected to return NETDEV_TX_OK even in error cases (just seems
strange).
Caught by compiler warning:
On 11/09/2018 02:02 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Add travis builds for DPDK as a shared library.
>
> Currently the DPDK builds in travis only compile DPDK as a static library.
> With static builds in DPDK there is a risk that if a function is not
> exported then it will not be supported when DPDK is
Note: This patch will require backporting to 2.10 as well.
ovn-kubernetes uses a pattern where they have a "join" switch that
connects to multiple gateway routers. They make use of IPAM on the
switch to allocate IP addresses on the switch ports. They then create
the logical router port, connect
When a logical switch port changes to no longer use "dynamic" addresses,
then the dynamic_addresses should be cleared.
Reported-by: Girish Moodalbail
Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson
---
ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c | 2 +-
tests/ovn.at| 19 +++
2 files changed, 20
Hi Ilya and thanks for your comments.
Please see inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 11:16 AM
> To: Ophir Munk ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Asaf Penso ; Ian Stokes ;
> Shahaf Shuler ; Thomas Monjalon
> ; Olga Shern ; Kevin Traynor
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:05:24PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > On 11/09/2018 02:02 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > > > Add travis builds for DPDK as a shared library.
> > > >
> > > > Currently the DPDK builds in travis only compile DPDK as a static
> > > library.
> > > > With static builds in DPDK
Not a full review.
Comments inline.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 15.01.2019 12:17, Ophir Munk wrote:
> Dpdk port representors were introduced in dpdk versions 18.xx.
> Prior to port representors there was a one-to-one relationship
> between an rte device (e.g. PCI bus) and an eth device
"Lam, Tiago" writes:
> On 09/11/2018 14:02, Ian Stokes wrote:
>> Add travis builds for DPDK as a shared library.
>>
>> Currently the DPDK builds in travis only compile DPDK as a static library.
>> With static builds in DPDK there is a risk that if a function is not
>> exported then it will not
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:22:07AM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
> Thanks for this!
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:48 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 08:15:36AM -0600, Terry Wilson wrote:
> > > This fix was reverted because it depended on a small bit of code
> > > in a
Following code looks like it might be wrong. I don't know much about
the way the stt infrastructure is being used, so feel free to ignore if
it is expected to return NETDEV_TX_OK even in error cases (just seems
strange).
---
datapath/
___
dev mailing
On 16.01.2019 20:36, Ophir Munk wrote:
> Hi Ilya and thanks for your comments.
> Please see inline
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ilya Maximets
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 11:16 AM
>> To: Ophir Munk ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
>> Cc: Asaf Penso ; Ian Stokes ;
>> Shahaf Shuler ;
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:05:24PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > On 11/09/2018 02:02 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > > Add travis builds for DPDK as a shared library.
> > >
> > > Currently the DPDK builds in travis only compile DPDK as a static
> > library.
> > > With static builds in DPDK there is a
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:31:24AM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Up until now, OVN rpms were generated as sub packages of OpenvSwitch.
> This patch now splits it and makes OVN rpms independent.
>
> A new spec file - ovn-fedora.spec.in is added for this.
> The
ipam_add_port_adresses() needs to be called after the peer field is set
on the ovn_port structures. This way, addresses taken by peered router
ports will be added to the logical switch's IPAM and therefore will be
barred from assignment to other ports.
Reported-by: Girish Moodalbail
> On 11/09/2018 02:02 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > Add travis builds for DPDK as a shared library.
> >
> > Currently the DPDK builds in travis only compile DPDK as a static
> library.
> > With static builds in DPDK there is a risk that if a function is not
> > exported then it will not be supported
Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a mechanism to configure permit/deny and
reroute policies on the router.
Permit/deny policies are similar to OVN ACLs, but exist on the logical-router.
Reroute policies are needed for service-insertion and service-chaining.
Currently, policies are stateless.
Mary Manohar (1):
Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a mechanism to configure
permit/deny and reroute policies on the router. Permit/deny policies
are similar to OVN ACLs, but exist on the logical-router. Reroute
policies are needed for service-insertion and service-chaining.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:01:13PM +, Mary Manohar wrote:
> Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a mechanism to configure permit/deny and
> reroute policies on the router.
> Permit/deny policies are similar to OVN ACLs, but exist on the logical-router.
> Reroute policies are needed for
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:16:36AM +, Ted Elhourani wrote:
> The Python IDL implementation supports ovsdb cluster connections.
> This patch is a follow up to commit 31e434fc98, it adds the option of
> connecting to the leader (the default) in the Raft-based cluster. It mimics
> the exisiting C
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mary Manohar, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Inappropriate bracing around statement
#101 FILE: ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c:4698:
if
From: Han Zhou
When ovn clustered mode is specified, the environment veriables
OVN_NB_DB/OVN_SB_DB are wrong. It should be something like
unix:nb1,unix:nb2,unix:nb3 but it turns out to be unix:nb1,unix:nb1,unix:nb2.
So when nb3 becomes leader, the connection will always fail.
It is caused by
Hi Aaron,
Apologies for the formatting issues earlier.
Attached the patch to the message here as suggested.
Let me know if this works. Otherwise, will look to submit a pull request.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Prashanth
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Conole
Sent: Wednesday,
ofpact_learn_spec->n_bits is the size of immediate data that is
following ofpact_learn_spec. Now it is defined as 'uint8_t'.
In many places, it gets its value directly from mf_subfield->n_bits,
whose type is 'unsigned int'. If input is large enough, there will
be uint8_t overflow.
For example,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:37:06AM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
> ipam_add_port_adresses() needs to be called after the peer field is set
> on the ovn_port structures. This way, addresses taken by peered router
> ports will be added to the logical switch's IPAM and therefore will be
> barred from
On 01/16/2019 01:13 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> Conditional EMC insert helps a lot in scenarios with high numbers of
>> parallel flows, but in current implementation this option affects all the
>> threads and ports at once. There are scenarios where we have different
>> number of flows on different
When a logical switch port changes to no longer use "dynamic" addresses,
then the dynamic_addresses should be cleared.
Reported-by: Girish Moodalbail
Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
ovn/northd/ovn-northd.c | 2 +-
tests/ovn.at| 19 +++
2
ovn-kubernetes uses a pattern where they have a "join" switch that
connects to multiple gateway routers. They make use of IPAM on the
switch to allocate IP addresses on the switch ports. They then create
the logical router port, connect the switch port to it, and copy the
assigned addresses to the
ipam_add_port_adresses() needs to be called after the peer field is set
on the ovn_port structures. This way, addresses taken by peered router
ports will be added to the logical switch's IPAM and therefore will be
barred from assignment to other ports.
Reported-by: Girish Moodalbail
On 1/16/19 1:47 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:37:06AM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
ipam_add_port_adresses() needs to be called after the peer field is set
on the ovn_port structures. This way, addresses taken by peered router
ports will be added to the logical switch's IPAM
Hi Numan,
Thanks for the review, please find responses inline.
Ted
On Jan 11, 2019, at 2:23 AM, Numan Siddique
mailto:nusid...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:26 PM Numan Siddique
mailto:nusid...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi Ted,
This patch is failing the below test cases for me.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:59:24AM +, Anju Thomas wrote:
> Currently OVS maintains explicit packet drop/error counters only on port
> level. Packets that are dropped as part of normal OpenFlow processing are
> counted in flow stats of “drop” flows or as table misses in table stats.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:40:48PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 08:32:48AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> > Currently OVS supports all ARP protocol fields as OXM match fields to
> > implement the relevant ARP procedures for IPv4. This includes support
> > for matching
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:32:02PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:01:13PM +, Mary Manohar wrote:
> > Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a mechanism to configure permit/deny
> > and reroute policies on the router.
> > Permit/deny policies are similar to OVN ACLs, but
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: Ophir Munk ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Ian Stokes ; Olga Shern ; Ilya
> Maximets
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] netdev-dpdk: support port representors
>
> On 01/15/2019 09:47 AM, Ophir Munk
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:04:16AM +, Pieter Jansen van Vuuren wrote:
> +/* These functions specifically help shifting values that are in
> + * network byte order but stored in uint32_t variables. */
> +static uint32_t shift_ovs_be32_left(uint32_t word, int shift)
> +{
> +uint32_t
This assertion was removed as part of a commit that was intended to
just be a cleanup.
Fixes: 6fd6ed71cb9f ("ofpbuf: Simplify ofpbuf API.")
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
include/openvswitch/ofpbuf.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/openvswitch/ofpbuf.h
In this piece of code, 'struct ofpbuf b' should always point to
metadata so that metadata can be filled with values through ofpbuf
operations, like ofpbuf_put_hex and ofpbuf_push_zeros. However,
ofpbuf_push_zeros may change the data pointer of 'struct ofpbuf b'
and therefore, metadata will not
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 08:32:48AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> Currently OVS supports all ARP protocol fields as OXM match fields to
> implement the relevant ARP procedures for IPv4. This includes support
> for matching copying and setting ARP fields. In IPv6 ARP has been
> replaced by
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:46:28PM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
> ovn-kubernetes uses a pattern where they have a "join" switch that
> connects to multiple gateway routers. They make use of IPAM on the
> switch to allocate IP addresses on the switch ports. They then create
> the logical router
From: Ross Lagerwall
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:16:56 +
> For nested and variable attributes, the expected length of an attribute
> is not known and marked by a negative number. This results in an OOB
> read when the expected length is later used to check if the attribute is
> all zeros. Fix
Sure, I fixed and verified with “make flake8-check”.
Ted
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:16:36AM +, Ted Elhourani wrote:
>> The Python IDL implementation supports ovsdb cluster connections.
>> This patch is a follow up to commit 31e434fc98, it
Bleep bloop. Greetings Justin Pettit, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
ERROR: Author Justin Pettit needs to sign off.
Lines checked: 26, Warnings: 0, Errors: 1
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:36:50PM -0800, Yifeng Sun wrote:
> In this piece of code, 'struct ofpbuf b' should always point to
> metadata so that metadata can be filled with values through ofpbuf
> operations, like ofpbuf_put_hex and ofpbuf_push_zeros. However,
> ofpbuf_push_zeros may change the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:52:51PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> ---
> ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
> index 8d213b27aae1..65a47a41d382 100644
> --- a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
> +++
---
ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
index 8d213b27aae1..65a47a41d382 100644
--- a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
+++ b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
@@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ ovsdb_server_disable_monitor_cond(struct
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 06:03:42PM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Signed-off-by: Numan Siddique
Thanks, applied to master.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:28:29PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:31:24AM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > Up until now, OVN rpms were generated as sub packages of OpenvSwitch.
> > This patch now splits it and makes OVN rpms
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 08:32:48AM +, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> Currently OVS supports all ARP protocol fields as OXM match fields to
> implement the relevant ARP procedures for IPv4. This includes support
> for matching copying and setting ARP fields. In IPv6 ARP has been
> replaced by
The Python IDL implementation supports ovsdb cluster connections.
This patch is a follow up to commit 31e434fc98, it adds the option of
connecting to the leader (the default) in the Raft-based cluster. It mimics
the exisiting C IDL support for clusters introduced in commit 1b1d2e6daa.
The _Server
The attachment looks missing to me.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:29:39PM +, Iyengar, Prashanth wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Apologies for the formatting issues earlier.
> Attached the patch to the message here as suggested.
> Let me know if this works. Otherwise, will look to submit a pull request.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:01:13PM +, Mary Manohar wrote:
> Policy-based routing (PBR) provides a mechanism to configure permit/deny and
> reroute policies on the router.
> Permit/deny policies are similar to OVN ACLs, but exist on the logical-router.
> Reroute policies are needed for
Lieber Freund,
Ich bin Herr Richard Wahl der Mega-Gewinner von $ 533M In Mega Millions Jackpot
spende ich an 5 zufällige Personen, wenn Sie diese E-Mail erhalten, dann wurde
Ihre E-Mail nach einem Spinball ausgewählt. Ich habe den größten Teil meines
Vermögens auf eine Reihe von
Hi Ilya,
Thanks for the quick review.
Please find comments inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 5:42 PM
> To: Ophir Munk ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; Ian
> Stokes
> Cc: Asaf Penso ; Shahaf Shuler
> ; Thomas Monjalon ; Olga
> Shern ; Kevin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 4:54 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> ovn/ovn-nb.xml | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovn/ovn-nb.xml b/ovn/ovn-nb.xml
> index 6d6fb055a082..47a36ddab52c 100644
> --- a/ovn/ovn-nb.xml
> +++
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva"
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:19:17 -0600
> One of the more common cases of allocation size calculations is finding the
> size of a structure that has a zero-sized array at the end, along with memory
> for some number of elements for that array. For example:
>
> struct
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
ovn/ovn-nb.xml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ovn/ovn-nb.xml b/ovn/ovn-nb.xml
index 6d6fb055a082..47a36ddab52c 100644
--- a/ovn/ovn-nb.xml
+++ b/ovn/ovn-nb.xml
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
highest- matching row in this table
Hi Ben,
Sorry again!
Attached the patch to email initially.
Submitted a pull request for the same issue.
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/pull/269
Thanks,
Prashanth
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 15:24
To: Iyengar, Prashanth
Cc:
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 4:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:52:51PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> ---
>> ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
>> index
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:45:10PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> From: Han Zhou
>
> When ovn clustered mode is specified, the environment veriables
> OVN_NB_DB/OVN_SB_DB are wrong. It should be something like
> unix:nb1,unix:nb2,unix:nb3 but it turns out to be unix:nb1,unix:nb1,unix:nb2.
> So when
I think you'll probably have to get someone else to track down the
issue. I haven't found the time to try to reproduce it.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 08:33:27AM +, Ani Sinha wrote:
> Hi Ben:
>
> Any luck reproducing the issue? Also looking at similar issues in the past, I
> see we have
Currently OVS maintains explicit packet drop/error counters only on port
level. Packets that are dropped as part of normal OpenFlow processing are
counted in flow stats of “drop” flows or as table misses in table stats.
These can only be interpreted by controllers that know the
Sure Ben. I will send the patch right away.
Regards
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 2:18 AM
To: Anju Thomas
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org; Keshav Gupta
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v5] :Improved Packet Drop Statistics in OVS
Hi folks,
Do these changes look ok?
Regards & thanks
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Anju Thomas [mailto:anju.tho...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2019 3:29 PM
To: d...@openvswitch.org
Cc: Anju Thomas ; Rohith Basavaraja
; Keshav Gupta
Subject: [PATCH v5] :Improved Packet
Hi Folks,
Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
Regards
Anju
-Original Message-
From: Lam, Tiago [mailto:tiago@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 11:27 PM
To: Anju Thomas ; Ben Pfaff
Cc: d...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] Fix crash due to
On 16/01/2019 09:30, Anju Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Are these changes planned to be merged as well?
>
> Regards
> Anju
Hi Anju,
Unfortunately, no. An RFC based on the below was proposed to the mailing
list here [1], but no discussion / comments happened after that. Further
discussion
Hi Kevin and thank you for your comments.
Please see inline...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 4:20 PM
> To: Ophir Munk ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Ian Stokes ; Olga Shern ;
> Ilya Maximets
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] netdev-dpdk: support
Hi Ian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stokes, Ian
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 12:37 AM
> To: Kevin Traynor ; Ophir Munk
> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Olga Shern ; Ilya Maximets
>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] netdev-dpdk: support port representors
>
> > On 01/15/2019 09:47 AM,
16/01/2019 11:03, Ophir Munk:
> Hi Kevin and thank you for your comments.
> Please see inline...
>
> From: Kevin Traynor
> > On 01/15/2019 09:47 AM, Ophir Munk wrote:
> > > Dpdk port representors were introduced in dpdk versions 18.xx.
> > > Prior to port representors there was a one-to-one
Dobrý den,
moderní příspěvek na stravování v podobě obědové karty, kterou lze použít ve
více než 15 000 restauracích a gastronomických zařízení po celé zemi, je
nástroj, který Vám pomůže poskytnout svým zaměstnancům nejžádanější benefit v
ČR.
Výzkum Světové zdravotnické organizace WHO
Hi all,
This set extends the ovs-tc pedit interface to allow setting ipv4
dscp and ecn fields as well as ipv6 traffic class in tc via pedit.
Patch 2 in this set also introduces the notion of boundary shifts
to allow translating non-byte-aligned fields like traffic class and
flow limit for IPv6 to
Extend ovs-tc translation by allowing non-byte-aligned fields
for set actions. Use new boundary shifts and add set ipv6 traffic
class action offload via pedit.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren
Signed-off-by: Louis Peens
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
---
lib/netdev-tc-offloads.c | 4 ++
Add setting of ipv4 dscp and ecn fields in tc offload using pedit.
Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren
Signed-off-by: Louis Peens
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
---
lib/netdev-tc-offloads.c | 6 +-
lib/tc.c | 5 +
lib/tc.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 11
Please ignore this patch, the baseline of the patch is incorrect.
Thanks,
Yunjian
> -Original Message-
> From: wangyunjian
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 2:28 PM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: b...@ovn.org; xudingke ; wangyunjian
>
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH]
Hi Ben:
Any luck reproducing the issue? Also looking at similar issues in the past, I
see we have encountered something similar like here :
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-February/344088.html
Did we found out where the memory leak was? Was there a patch to fix it?
Thanks
Thanks for this!
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:48 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 08:15:36AM -0600, Terry Wilson wrote:
> > This fix was reverted because it depended on a small bit of code
> > in a patch that was reverted that changed some python/ovs testing
> > and build. The fix is
91 matches
Mail list logo
