Am 24.06.2013 17:57, schrieb Mick Sulley:
> OK found that, lines 111-115 are
>
> if (pn_raw_directory->selected_filetype != NO_FILETYPE) {
> // File, not directory
> LEVEL_CALL("return ENOTDIR pn_raw_directory=%p",
> pn_raw_directory);
> ret = -ENOTDIR;
OK found that, lines 111-115 are
if (pn_raw_directory->selected_filetype != NO_FILETYPE) {
// File, not directory
LEVEL_CALL("return ENOTDIR pn_raw_directory=%p",
pn_raw_directory);
ret = -ENOTDIR;
So I guess that means that the patch is installed?
Mi
On 24 June 2013 16:25, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am 19.06.2013 09:39, schrieb Mick Sulley:
>> I am sure that I hit the error in Nautilus, as to the patch I am less sure.
>>
>> I downloaded and installed owfs as normal and checked that it worked, I
>> then applied the patch as you said, I then ran
>>
Am 19.06.2013 09:39, schrieb Mick Sulley:
> I am sure that I hit the error in Nautilus, as to the patch I am less sure.
>
> I downloaded and installed owfs as normal and checked that it worked, I
> then applied the patch as you said, I then ran
>
> ./configure
> make
> sudo make install
>
> Is
I am sure that I hit the error in Nautilus, as to the patch I am less sure.
I downloaded and installed owfs as normal and checked that it worked, I
then applied the patch as you said, I then ran
./configure
make
sudo make install
Is that correct? Is there any way to check that the patch is ins
Am 17.06.2013 21:09, schrieb Mick Sulley:
> OK I downloaded and installed again, it worked, I installed the patch
> and it seemed OK (I've never installed a patch before). I re-ran the
> test and the file is attached. Please let me know if there is anything
> else I can do
>
OK, this is very odd
OK I downloaded and installed again, it worked, I installed the patch
and it seemed OK (I've never installed a patch before). I re-ran the
test and the file is attached. Please let me know if there is anything
else I can do
Mick
On 17/06/13 16:26, Jan Kandziora wrote:
Am 17.06.2013 12:21,
Am 17.06.2013 12:21, schrieb Mick Sulley:
> I am happy to try to investigate further, but you will need to give me
> some pointers:) What do I need to do?
>
Get the owfs-2.9p0 sources, make sure they compile and run fine on your
machine. *Then* apply the appended minimal patch:
[~/src/owfs-2.9p
I am happy to try to investigate further, but you will need to give me
some pointers:) What do I need to do?
On 17/06/13 10:37, Jan Kandziora wrote:
> Am 13.06.2013 13:59, schrieb Mick Sulley:
>> OK I have repeated but I cannot see anything that looks like an error,
>> so the whole thing is att
Am 13.06.2013 13:59, schrieb Mick Sulley:
>
> OK I have repeated but I cannot see anything that looks like an error,
> so the whole thing is attached as a zip. Amazing how much log it
> produces:)
>
I see nautilus is querying /.Trash-1000 (a Windowmaker-style trash
directory). Obviously, this won
Still confused about this. I wondered if it may be a faulty adapter, so
I bought a new one and it is the same. I wondered if it may be some
difference in the owfs version, but my main system and laptop are both
running
./owfs version:
2.9p0
libow version:
2.9p0
They both use DS9490R
OK I have repeated but I cannot see anything that looks like an error,
so the whole thing is attached as a zip. Amazing how much log it
produces:)
I had Nautilus open on /var/1-wire ran the command then navigated into
mnt/10.0D54A9010800 and double clicked temperature saw the error Ctr C
t
Am 13.06.2013 10:27, schrieb Mick Sulley:
> OK here is the log, hope that helps, I confess it doesn't mean much to
> me:) This is just the end section when the error occurred, if you need
> more please let me know.
> Mick
>
> NODEID: 2
> unique: 370, success, outsize: 144
> unique: 371,
OK here is the log, hope that helps, I confess it doesn't mean much to
me:) This is just the end section when the error occurred, if you need
more please let me know.
Mick
NODEID: 2
unique: 370, success, outsize: 144
unique: 371, opcode: LOOKUP (1), nodeid: 2, insize: 52, pid: 5196
LOOK
Am 12.06.2013 12:30, schrieb Mick Sulley:
>
> The folder contents could not be displayed.
> Sorry, could not display all the contents of "temperature": Not a
> directory
>
This is ENOTDIR and there is only one place in the owlib sources where
that error is returned. Could you start owf
Well I had got that wrong, main system is powered and I hadn't adjusted
for that, but having linked VDD and GND it still behaves the same.
I have just tested it out using a spare RasPi and the new sensors and
wiring are fine, which is what I wanted to test, but I am still
interested to get to
Are you using them with passive power (powered by the 1-wire line)? If so,
possibly you connected the VCC pin wrong (I did that once and got the same
behaviour).
/Marc
Op 12 jun. 2013 12:31 schreef "Mick Sulley" het volgende:
> i am extending my network, adding 3 temperature sensors and I wanted
TECTED] on behalf of Gregg Levine
Sent: Tue 2/21/2006 11:01 PM
To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Strange problem building the latest release
(Resent)
Hello!
It seems I decided to goof. Thanks! That was indeed it. It seems I
have not been keeping up.
A su
SWIG is 1.3.28
> I use 1.3.24 on my current distribution
>
> Paul
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gregg Levine
> Sent: Tue 2/21/2006 8:58 PM
> To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Stra
I see the current version of SWIG is 1.3.28
I use 1.3.24 on my current distribution
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gregg Levine
Sent: Tue 2/21/2006 8:58 PM
To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Strange problem building the
Hello!
I don't know what kind of luck I am having this week. But I'd rather
be on Tatooine with it. That being said I believe my problems lie in
the release of SWIG that I chose. It's the 1.3.9 one that I was trying
to work with last time. Is that the most current release of SWIG
that's accessible
I don't believe owftpd works.
(So I wouldn't enable it).
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Christian
Magnusson
Sent: Mon 2/20/2006 3:01 PM
To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: SV: [Owfs-developers] Strange problem building the latest release
(Res
22 matches
Mail list logo
