Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 14.09.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Johan Ström: > > Colin, Jan, Colin, and everyone else: Besides the above, what do you > guys think of the GitHub wiki? Would it be an acceptable way to go > forward? It certainly has a few downsides (mainly lack of structuring, > image uploads), but it's very easy to

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Colin Reese
As long as the word uncouth is used. When it comes to family codes I have an orphaned page here that may be helpful. I'll also be restructuring my site this week. Good timing. https://www.interfaceinnovations.org/onewirefamilycodes.html C > On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:02 AM, Jan Kandziora wrote

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Nigel Titley
On 14/09/16 09:02, Jan Kandziora wrote: > Am 14.09.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Johan Ström: >> Colin, Jan, Colin, and everyone else: Besides the above, what do you >> guys think of the GitHub wiki? Would it be an acceptable way to go >> forward? It certainly has a few downsides (mainly lack of structur

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Mick Sulley
Yes I would echo Nigel's comments. I don't think there is a perfect solution but what is suggested sounds good to me. Mick On 14/09/16 10:14, Nigel Titley wrote: > > On 14/09/16 09:02, Jan Kandziora wrote: >> Am 14.09.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Johan Ström: >>> Colin, Jan, Colin, and everyone else:

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Arne Raaen
As a pedestrian owfs user, I would like to support the proposal that it should be made very clear very early that owserver is the way to go. I used owfs directly for several months before slowly realizing this. Not so unexpected perhaps, the system is after all called "owfs", and "owserver" may so

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Johan Ström
On 14/09/16 10:02, Jan Kandziora wrote: > Am 14.09.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Johan Ström: >> Colin, Jan, Colin, and everyone else: Besides the above, what do you >> guys think of the GitHub wiki? Would it be an acceptable way to go >> forward? It certainly has a few downsides (mainly lack of structuri

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Colin Reese
I added some things. I show up as Interface Innovations at the moment. C On 9/14/2016 12:08 PM, Johan Ström wrote: > On 14/09/16 10:02, Jan Kandziora wrote: > >> Am 14.09.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Johan Ström: >>> Colin, Jan, Colin, and everyone else: Besides the above, what do you >>> guys think of

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 14.09.2016 um 21:08 schrieb Johan Ström: > > [...] > I made a small manpage to markdown converter script. Test manpage at https://github.com/owfs/owfs-doc/wiki/DS18B20 I will test the script it a bit more, wrap it up, then upload the manpages to the wiki automatically. Kind regards J

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Gregg Levine
Hello! Are also migrating off of Source Forge for everything else? - Gregg C Levine gregg.drw...@gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Jan Kandziora wrote: > Am 14.09.2016 um 21:08 schrieb Johan Ström: >> >> [...] >> > I made a smal

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-14 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 15.09.2016 um 03:57 schrieb Gregg Levine: > Hello! > Are also migrating off of Source Forge for everything else? > Yes, but that may take some time. Kind regards Jan --