I once worked on a project that had Deep Zoom and Playboy archives... :D
---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
I buy it for the articles.
That's what I tell my wife about Playboy magazine -- Greg
I think that's technology abuse. It's also awesome. So did't hey have a
relaxed nsfw policy?
On 30/09/2013 6:14 PM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
I once worked on a project that had Deep Zoom and Playboy archives... :D
---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com
On
To a degree, but I think that's more of a factor of what people are working on
at the time and what they are comfortable with. For example, our team writes
MSDN articles and we going to be talking about the new features that we just
wrote, not existing areas that haven't been touched in years.
New isn't bad but it needs to balance out and if anyone inside the company
actually thinks the large majority of .NET developers are working on new
day in day out they probably have a distorted view over the entire
landscape. The reports I used to read / get on developer adoption were
inaccurate
This may be useful for some people -
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OACI) has unveiled a
guide designed to help mobile app developers embed better privacy practices
into their products.
The guide, Mobile privacy: A better practice guide for mobile app
developers,
Yes that might be where you want the customer to go, but I assure you that
it isn't necessarily where the customer is going. The recent debacle with
the tablet should be showing Microsoft that customers are not as willing to
follow them blindly.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:03 AM, David Kean
6/10? I'd love to see the sample set. I suspect if you had truly general
sample set it would more likely be that they didn't have a smartphone
because:
a. They cost lots
b. They don't need them
(however true or untrue those ideas may be)
On 1 October 2013 15:02, Ian Thomas
I believe you misread this. The quote below was with respect to deciding
whether or not to install an app, not whether or not they had a mobile phone.
...6 in 10 Australians chose not to use certain smartphone apps because...
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
Doh. I did indeed :-)
On 1 October 2013 16:39, ben.robb...@jlta.com.au wrote:
I believe you misread this. The quote below was with respect to deciding
whether or not to install an app, not whether or not they had a mobile
phone.
** **
“…6 in 10 Australians chose not to use *certain
People say one thing, but do another. I was suspicious of the great caution
and sensibility of these sample respondents!
Nevertheless, the actual guide (on privacy notices for mobile applications -
apps) is worth the read, I think.
_
Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia
From:
Omg yes.
If you have ever tried to sit down on a tablet and do something and after a
few minutes of failing thought fuck this, I need a real computer then you
know what I am talking about.
When tablets can do everything a pc can do now then we won't need pc's. But
there is still a lot tablets
11 matches
Mail list logo
