Re: [OT] Angular certification

> > Scripting Language Fatigue: When you have to learn Yet Another Scripting > Language (YASL) > You mean YAJSF (yet another JavaScript framework). I received the usual notification about the next ALT.NET meetup (which I missed), and guess what ... someone spruiked YAJSF. See: October Meeting

Re: [OT] Angular certification

25 | @thenickrandolph | >>> skype:nick_randolph >>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not >>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this >>> email in any way. Built to Roam Pty Ltd does not guarantee the i

Re: [OT] Angular certification

(www.aurelia.io) >> >> >> Rob Eisenberg worked on Angular2 (and Caliburn*). He likes his >> conventions. >> >> >> -- >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on >> behalf of Corneliu I. Tusnea >> *Sent:* Friday, 21 October 2016 9:20 PM >> *To:* oz

Re: [OT] Angular certification

4:21 PM, Paul Glavich > wrote: > >> Gave up on Ang2. I don’t like the direction and the Release process was >> silly. Aurelia I find much much better. >> >> >> >> - Glav >> >> >> >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.c

Re: [OT] Angular certification

ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] Angular certification You too Paul? I also gave up on Angular 2 and moved to Aurelia (www.aurelia.io<http://www.aurelia.io>) and I love it. [https://i.vimeocdn.com/video/549948734.jpg?mw=1000&mh=565]<http://www.aurelia.io/> Home | Aurelia<http://www

Re: [OT] Angular certification

gt; *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:11 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* RE: [OT] Angular certification > > > > We’re just in process of publish an app written in Angular 2, so yes, > definitely taking it seriously. A lot of pain upgrading from Beta/RC to RTM > (it’s like they

Re: [OT] Angular certification

t; - Glav > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ > ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Nick Randolph > *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:11 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* RE: [OT] Angular certification > > > > We’re just in

RE: [OT] Angular certification

Subject: RE: [OT] Angular certification We’re just in process of publish an app written in Angular 2, so yes, definitely taking it seriously. A lot of pain upgrading from Beta/RC to RTM (it’s like they didn’t understand what Beta/RC means). Nick Randolph | Built to Roam Pty Ltd | Microsoft

RE: [OT] Angular certification

: ozDotNet Subject: RE: [OT] Angular certification Anyone played with and/or used <https://www.polymer-project.org/1.0/> https://www.polymer-project.org/1.0/ Nick Randolph | Built to Roam Pty Ltd | Microsoft MVP – Windows Platform Development | +61 412 413 425 | @thenickra

Re: [OT] Angular certification

> > How it feels to learn JavaScript in 2016 > > That's fabulous. It would be funny if it wasn't true -- *GK*

RE: [OT] Angular certification

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of DotNet Dude Sent: Friday, 14 October 2016 11:32 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: [OT] Angular certification Lol nice article. I can count at least 1 interview per week I do where the candidate knows lots

Re: [OT] Angular certification

ot reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty >>> Ltd. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com >>> [mailto: >>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com >>> ] *On >>> Behalf Of *Tom P >>> *Sent:* Thurs

Re: [OT] Angular certification

d. >> >> >> >> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ozdot >> net.com] *On Behalf Of *Tom P >> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM >> *To:* ozDotNet >> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Angular certification >> >> >>

Re: [OT] Angular certification

t; > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ > ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tom P > *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Angular certification > > > > Angular 2 is entirely redone. TypeScript makes it als

Re: [OT] Angular certification

reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty > Ltd. > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ > ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tom P > *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Angular certificati

RE: [OT] Angular certification

files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty Ltd. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Tom P Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re

Re: [OT] Angular certification

Angular 2 is entirely redone. TypeScript makes it also bearable Thanks Tom On 13 October 2016 at 14:54, Greg Keogh wrote: > Are there any Angular certifications you guys can recommend that may be >> taken seriously? >> > > Can anyone even take Angular seriously?! > > I thought it was already ab

Re: [OT] Angular certification

> > Are there any Angular certifications you guys can recommend that may be > taken seriously? > Can anyone even take Angular seriously?! I thought it was already abandoned by the author who went off to write a new competing BlahJS, or is a new group completely rewriting it to Angular 2, or somet

Re: [OT] Angular certification

"2 years of angular 2 experience" should be replaced with "we are looking for John Papa - only apply if you are John Papa" On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Nick Randolph wrote: > Just wait until they ask for 2 years of Angular 2 experience….. which > hasn’t even been out 2 months, let alone 2 ye

RE: [OT] Angular certification

Just wait until they ask for 2 years of Angular 2 experience….. which hasn’t even been out 2 months, let alone 2 years ;-) Sorry not the answer you were looking for, but given that 2 is so different from 1, you’d be struggling to find certification on v2. I haven’t look recently but this book (