Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-08 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-08 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 8 October 2010 09:28, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 October 2010 07:47, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-07 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker 1.0 vs 1.1

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-07 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. On June, inside a complex thread regarding colocation -inf, Andrew

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-07 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question.

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-07 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 October 2010 08:33, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. Have a read of: http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series I

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-06 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. Have a read of:

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-06 Thread Shravan Mishra
That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. Thanks Shravan On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-06 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote: That is what I heard too, that's the reason for this question. On June, inside a complex thread regarding colocation -inf, Andrew reported the link and also several clarifications after some questions of mine... See

[Pacemaker] pacemaker version

2010-10-05 Thread Shravan Mishra
Hi, I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker 1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use. Thanks Shravan ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: