[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Jaroslav Prokop changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DEFERRED|NOTABUG

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Referenced

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Jaroslav Prokop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #14 from Jaroslav Prokop --- Ping... are you still interested in this package? It's been some time since the last update on this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #13 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Jaroslav Prokop from comment #11) > The Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess failures are happening because bundler is > needed for them and the upstream does not seem to mention

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #12 from Ilya Gradina --- (In reply to Jaroslav Prokop from comment #11) > The Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess failures are happening because bundler is > needed for them and the upstream does not seem to

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Prokop --- The Guard::RSpec::RSpecProcess failures are happening because bundler is needed for them and the upstream does not seem to mention that or require it at all in the file. I

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #10 from Ilya Gradina --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #9) > Oh, you are applying the latest packaging techniques (unpacking the gem via > %setup), very nice :) > > However, the "rspec -Ilib spec

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch --- Oh, you are applying the latest packaging techniques (unpacking the gem via %setup), very nice :) However, the "rspec -Ilib spec ||:" is too hand-wavy. If the test suite fails

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #8 from Ilya Gradina --- new spec: https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-guard-rspec.spec new srpm:

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #7 from Ilya Gradina --- (In reply to Jaroslav Prokop from comment #6) > Hi, I'll be taking this for a review. Have you advanced with the package, > Ilya? Thanks Jaroslav, I'll send a new version of the

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Jaroslav Prokop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Jaroslav Prokop changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Bug 1268696 depends on bug 1516328, which changed state. Bug 1516328 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-guard-compat - Tools for developing Guard compatible plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1516328 What|Removed

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #3) > also as rubygem(gem_isolator)(I'll try > to send soon on review request). I would not mind if you disabled the specific test case ATM: ~~~

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Gradina --- Hi Jaroslav, thx for the review. rubygem(launchy) - needed for tests, also as rubygem(gem_isolator)(I'll try to send soon on review request). results build on copr(with disable

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Prokop --- I am sorry, I forgot one last thing * Unnecessary dependency - The rubygem "launchy" does not seem like dependency to guard-rspec so I would drop it from requires if

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Jaroslav Prokop changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Bug 1268696 depends on bug 1268695, which changed state. Bug 1268695 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-guard-compat - Tools for developing Guard compatible plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268695 What|Removed

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Ilya Gradina changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1516328

[Bug 1268696] Review Request: rubygem-guard-rspec - Guard gem for RSpec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268696 Ilya Gradina changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1268695