[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request)

2021-04-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio T. sagitter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trp...@rocketmail.com

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request)

2021-04-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio T. sagitter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

needinfo granted: [Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request)

2021-04-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Antonio T. sagitter has granted Package Review 's request for Antonio T. (sagitter) 's needinfo: Bug 1359402: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request) https://bugzilla.redhat.com

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request)

2020-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2018-07-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2017-02-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #36 from Antonio Trande --- Ask on 'devel' mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2017-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #35 from Tim Fenn --- my fedora account doesn't have TICKET_CREATE privileges on rel-eng trac to make the unretire request. How should I proceed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2017-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2017-01-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #33 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #32) > - Please, remove empty sections (%check, %clean) > Done. > - Since Python sub-directory is named 'coot', i think it's better naming the >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2017-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #32 from Antonio Trande --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Please, remove empty

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2017-01-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #31 from Tim Fenn --- Finally found enough time to fix the majority (if not all) the unused-direct-shlib issues: https://timfenn.fedorapeople.org/coot.spec

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-12-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #29) > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #28) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27) > > > Created attachment 1221971 [details] > > >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-12-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #29 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #28) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27) > > Created attachment 1221971 [details] > > review log > > > > Package Review > >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-12-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #28 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27) > Created attachment 1221971 [details] > review log > > Package Review > == > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady BuildFails | -- You are

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #27 from Antonio Trande --- Created attachment 1221971 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1221971=edit review log Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #26 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #25) > I just managed to build rdkit in rawhide (no docs, no tests, but at least > we're there) so now you should be able to compile against it.

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #25 from Gianluca Sforna --- I just managed to build rdkit in rawhide (no docs, no tests, but at least we're there) so now you should be able to compile against it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #22) > Sorry guys for the rdkit related issues. > > Yes, right now I pushed the patch for the missing headers only in F24/F25 > > rdkit in

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #22 from Gianluca Sforna --- Sorry guys for the rdkit related issues. Yes, right now I pushed the patch for the missing headers only in F24/F25 rdkit in rawhide had several setbacks (new archs added with

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #20) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19) > > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #18) > > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #20 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19) > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #18) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17) > > > Why are you using coot-rdkit.patch

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #18 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #17) > Why are you using coot-rdkit.patch ? > It doesn't compile on F24 without it. However on rawhide it doesn't compile with or without the

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande --- Why are you using coot-rdkit.patch ? --- lbg/lbg-search.cc_orig2016-11-09 18:29:44.870809951 -0500 +++ lbg/lbg-search.cc2016-11-09 18:42:43.549933656 -0500 @@ -34,7 +34,7

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15) > coot does not compile on rawhide: > > libtool: compile: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"coot\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"coot\" >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande --- coot does not compile on rawhide: libtool: compile: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"coot\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"coot\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.8.7\" "-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"coot 0.8.7\""

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13) > Package Review > == > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package does not use a name

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-11-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11) > >OK, so just switch this to GPLv3+ and delete all the other stuff? > Yes. > Done. > Package Review > == > > Legend: > [x] =

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande --- >OK, so just switch this to GPLv3+ and delete all the other stuff? Yes. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #9) > > - hicolr-icon-theme should be a Requires package > Done. > - /usr/share/icons/hicolor/* directories are owned by hicolr-icon-theme. >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package unretired Package

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7) > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #6) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5) > > > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4) > > > >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #6) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5) > > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4) > > > > > > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch > > >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5) > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4) > > > > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch > > > > > > > I didn't specify it as such? > > I don't see

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | -- You are

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4) > > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch > > > > I didn't specify it as such? I don't see any 'BuildArch: noarch' line... > > New files: >

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Tim Fenn changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(tim.f...@gmail.co | |m)

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande --- Hi Tim. First of all: - Leave a comment about what patches do. - python(2)-sitelib macro is already defined - Use python2-devel as BR package - Use macros instead of hardlinks:

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-10-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn --- Sorry, corrupted link. Updated. SRPM URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nbW5Kb0RhdW1YOVU -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1359402] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )

2016-09-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #1 from Tim Fenn --- Updated spec/SRPM (for 0.8.6.1 version of the package): Spec URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3najl1NDBoVkc2ZUk SRPM URL: