[Bug 994152] Review Request: libprocess - Library that provides an actor style message-passing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994152 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de --- Package fails to build on f20: ... src/process.cpp: In function 'void process::send_file(ev_loop*, ev_io*, int)': src/process.cpp:1096:22: error: 'sendfile' is not a member of 'os' ssize_t length = os::sendfile(s, fd, offset, size); ... Further issues: * The compiler is invoked with broken arguments: ... -I.//include -I -I/src -I -I ... The -I.//include doesn't look cosher, but real issue here is the subsequent -I without arguments: # touch foo.cc # gcc -o foo.o -c foo.cc -I gcc: error: missing path after ‘-I’ You are only not seeing this error with this package, because these -I's swallow their next argument (which happen to be further -I's): # gcc -o foo.o -c foo.cc -I -I * consider to append --disable-static to %configure This avoids building the static libs and thus cuts down compilation times by ca. factor 2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n0lBjXOgaYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001728] Review Request: rubygem-rkerberos - A Ruby interface for the the Kerberos library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001728
Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Simon A. Erat from comment #1)
Hello Miroslav
Informal Review
* Valid License named in specfile:
Artistic 2.0
* Missing License:
Either as file or link in readme/manual of the package
There MUST be a copy of LICENSE within, in this case. Link within README would
not be sufficient according to Artistic 2.0 Permissions for Redistribution of
the Standard Version No. 2 ... provided that you duplicate all of the
original copyright notices and associated disclaimers ...
You should add this as another SOURCE to spec-file:
Source1: http://www.perlfoundation.org/attachment/legal/artistic-2_0.txt
copy it into src-tree `cp -a %{SOURCE1} COPYING` during %prep and include it
for %doc.
* Package fails to buld as noarch
Is an 'interface' really required to be the same arch as the
host-application
In this case yes, because it builds and provides a C-compiled interface.
##!!
Processing files: rubygem-rkerberos-0.1.2-3.fc19.noarch
+ popd
+ exit 0
Provides: rkerberos.so rubygem(rkerberos) = 0.1.2 rubygem-rkerberos =
0.1.2-3.fc19
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests)
= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcom_err.so.2 libcrypt.so.1 libdl.so.2
libkadm5clnt_mit.so.8 libkadm5clnt_mit.so.8(kadm5clnt_mit_8_MIT)
libkrb5.so.3 libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT) libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1
libruby.so.2.0 rtld(GNU_HASH)
error: Arch dependent binaries in noarch package
There you get it. C-compiled stuff :)
Issues:
===
- gems should require rubygems package
Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-rkerberos-doc
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems
False positve from f-r. It is present, but with SCL-macro prefixed:
Requires: %{?scl_prefix}rubygems
- Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
False positive here, too. C-compiled interface.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
---Its in: /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/rkerberos-0.1.2/lib
What does that mean?
This can actually be marked as PASS, because:
* It is supposed for C-compiled interfaces to have no SO-Version.
* Applies to *.so-files which are directly placed inside %{_libdir}, mostly.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of
licensecheck in /home/simon/1001728-rubygem-rkerberos/licensecheck.txt
This can be marked PASS. Having no explicit license commented inside the
file usualy means: Same license as in distributed LICENSE/COPYING.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
Yes, obviously there is no license file
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/gems/gems/rkerberos-0.1.2, /usr/share/gems,
/usr/share/gems/doc, /usr/share/gems/gems
This would need some more manual inspection...
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
LDFLAGS are not applied when linking obj to so. I'd usually recommend to have
%configure ||: on top of %build, so all FLAGS get exported properly.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
Can be marked PASS. There seem no bundled files / libs or subsets of them.
[ ]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
False positive. This is PASS.
[!]: Development files must be in a -devel package
--they are in a -debug package
What??? The debug-pkg looks sane to me. It is the regular fashion that -debug
contains a copy of all sources and the DWARF-part of the linked-binaries.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
-- cant tell, idk what ruby coders need to debug usefull
Having a look inside it should tell ;) There must be the sources and the
DWARF-parts of every build binary inside. To me it looks good. ;)
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Large documentation must go in a
[Bug 1001728] Review Request: rubygem-rkerberos - A Ruby interface for the the Kerberos library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001728 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=60MTBzVXara=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004678] Review Request: python-cov-core - Plugin core for use by pytest-cov, nose-cov and nose2-cov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004678 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2) Ah... bugzilla just caught errors. Please note that python-devel should be python2-devel. Oh snap, I always forget that :) Thanks for the review, I'll replace python-devel with python2-devel before committing. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-cov-core Short Description: Plugin core for use by pytest-cov, nose-cov and nose2-cov Owners: bkabrda Branches: f20 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wzfaVqpBTEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004963] Review Request: openstack-heat-templates - Heat example templates and DIB elements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004963
Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
||g
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jamieli...@fedoraproject.or
||g
--- Comment #1 from Jamie Nguyen jamieli...@fedoraproject.org ---
Issues:
===
1) Please add a URL tag.
2) Please use the GitHub Source URL guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
3) This is a pre-release package (as upstream have not made any releases yet),
so please use the snapshot package guidelines and pre-release package naming
guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
4) There is no version indicated upstream, and I can't find any indication that
'0.0.1' will be the version they will start with. Start versioning from '0'
instead, so something like openstack-heat-templates-0-0.1.20130813git. Upstream
might start from version '0.0.0', in which case '0.0.1' will be newer than
upstream.
5) The files are not purely documentation files and include shell scripts.
%{_datadir}/%{name} is probably a better location.
6) There are no %build or %install sections. These aren't compulsory, but it's
common practice to include them anyway even if you're not running any commands
inside them. It'll also silence the rpmlint warnings. This is not a MUST
though, so I won't block the review on this.
7) I'd say openshift-origin/ directory should be put into a separate subpackage
possibly called openshift-origin-templates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x5CoxMlZsTa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mbHx1OzZtOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1001351] Review Request: glite-lbjp-common-db - Database engine abstraction wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001351 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lbjp-common-db-3.2.8-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MnTL2KJTCta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005172] New: Review Request: python-llvmpy - Python bindings for LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005172 Bug ID: 1005172 Summary: Review Request: python-llvmpy - Python bindings for LLVM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sergio.pa...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-llvmpy.spec SRPM URL: http://guaix.fis.ucm.es/~spr/python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: llvmpy is a Python wrapper around the llvm C++ library which allows simple access to compiler tools. Fedora Account System Username: sergiopr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a1vN6SqXxXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] New: Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 Bug ID: 1005173 Summary: Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/SDL2_image.spec SRPM URL: http://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/SDL2_image-2.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Simple DirectMedia Layer (SDL) is a cross-platform multimedia library designed to provide fast access to the graphics frame buffer and audio device. This package contains a simple library for loading images of various formats (BMP, PPM, PCX, GIF, JPEG, PNG) as SDL surfaces. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BBQr19xIbza=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005172] Review Request: python-llvmpy - Python bindings for LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005172 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cicku...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iS2DQTzx21a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821404] Review Request: gimp-dds-plugin - A plugin for GIMP allows to load/save in the DDS format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821404 Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2013-09-06 07:50:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rq6YlXib2Ja=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004337] Review Request: python3-docs - Documentation for the Python 3 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337
Simon A. Erat erat.si...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erat.si...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Simon A. Erat erat.si...@gmail.com ---
Informal Review - failed
-
Spec not 'clear'
Use the %{name} makro instead of self created ${python}.
Within the spec, and the source, Python is written in small and capital
letters, both ways.
Fix naming issues.
%build - looks quite empty, is that enough?
%install - no files to move/cp?
You want to make a documention package of python 3 only.
Why dont you download the docs-tarball from python?
http://docs.python.org/3/download.html
Further its 3.2.2, not the latest package 3.4.0.
Fix this and try again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gFxVDUmZaea=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004951] Review Request: qtbrowserplugin - Qt Solutions Component: Browser Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004951 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||limburg...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|limburg...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Looking. . . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=inY7NykpSRa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004337] Review Request: python3-docs - Documentation for the Python 3 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- FTBFS on rawhide! Excerpt from build.log: (%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Dn6X33 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd Python-3.3.2 + make -C Doc html make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.3.2/Doc' Checking out Sphinx... /bin/sh: line 2: svn: command not found make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.3.2/Doc' make: *** [checkout] Error 127 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HbUZGl6q5Fa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004337] Review Request: python3-docs - Documentation for the Python 3 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337 --- Comment #3 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Thoughts on spec-file: * You can strip a lot of the macro-madness, which has 0-impact on the actual result. * There is an easy way of getting the needed python-version: %global pyver %(v=`python3 --version 21 | sed -es/.ython[ \t]*//`;echo $v) which is better than hardcoding it ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4C04LY6XaUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||limburg...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|limburg...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: SDL2_image.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary showimage Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. None exists. SDL2_image-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files Move README.txt into -devel - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( LGPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Otherwise very clean. Move the README prior to import. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DGQQhAFmKoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004337] Review Request: python3-docs - Documentation for the Python 3 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337
--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for your comments, guys:
- As for the %{python} macro, where in the specfile do I use it in an
inappropriate place?
- The macro madness is there because when the package goes through the
review, I want it to have minimal diff with python-docs package (which this
package is based on, BTW). So each spec will hardcode the python version, but
each will be different.
- %build - yes, I just create documentation and remove the .buildinfo dir,
nothing else needed
- If I'm referring to the same docs as you, they are already generated and
can't be regeneraged. I consider that bad, everything should be built from
source, IMO, even just documentation.
- As for the Koji failure, that's interesting... I didn't experience it in my
local mock, but I admit I didn't scrub it before building. I'll investigate and
repost the spec and srpm once I find the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NMCE2lcdAGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com --- OK. Will move README at import. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: SDL2_image Short Description: Image loading library for SDL Owners: ignatenkobrain Branches: f19 f20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xLJtscXPEJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004337] Review Request: python3-docs - Documentation for the Python 3 programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004337
--- Comment #5 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda from comment #4)
Thanks for your comments, guys:
- As for the %{python} macro, where in the specfile do I use it in an
inappropriate place?
Actually nowhere, it was just about that macro-medness, I think. :)
- The macro madness is there because when the package goes through the
review, I want it to have minimal diff with python-docs package (which
this package is based on, BTW). So each spec will hardcode the python
version, but each will be different.
Why do you want to keep the diff as small as possible? Is there any not
foreseeable reason in it?
btw. Why don't you just generate pkg the docs during build of regular
python3-pkg? Afaik, you are the maintainer of it, too.
- If I'm referring to the same docs as you, they are already generated and
can't be regeneraged. I consider that bad, everything should be built from
source, IMO, even just documentation.
Just explained that to Simon in 1:1 irc. ;)
- As for the Koji failure, that's interesting... I didn't experience it in
my local mock, but I admit I didn't scrub it before building. I'll
investigate and repost the spec and srpm once I find the problem.
It seems there is something on the make file, which tries to do some
SVN-checkout...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cN4CQJQkQua=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004845] Review Request: python-libarchive - Fully functional Python wrapper for libarchive.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004845
Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org |
--- Comment #10 from Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com ---
On f19 it builds, bug segfaults
tar zcvf example.tar.gz /tmp/.Test-unix/
tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
/tmp/.Test-unix/
import libarchive.
a = libarchive.Archive('example.tar.gz')
for entry in a:
... print entry.pathname
... a.close()
File stdin, line 3
a.close()
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
a
libarchive.Archive object at 0x7f14629bdc50
a.close()
for entry in a:
... print entry.pathname
...
Segmentation fault
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qL561TCONPa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N0vyJkLLYga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qAF6XA6NI5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- SDL2_image-2.0.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/SDL2_image-2.0.0-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zT8TDCm2oPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NdXtm0mmXba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- SDL2_image-2.0.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/SDL2_image-2.0.0-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=E7Qd92SVg7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915907] Review Request: qt5-qtquick1 - Qt5 - QtQuick1 component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915907 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtquick1.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qt5/qt5-qtquick1-5.1.1-1.fc19.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 03 2013 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 5.1.1-1 - 5.1.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KHT2fVB4SJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813832] Review Request: linuxdcpp - linux port of dc++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813832 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Do you intend to import and build this at any point? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JOmuzhnVo9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961223] Review Request: ocrfeeder - A document layout analysis and optical character recognition system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961223 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Any updated on this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xGuUwXFSpBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 961223] Review Request: ocrfeeder - A document layout analysis and optical character recognition system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961223 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jro...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(jro...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- I can patch it for pillow but I still want upstream to do this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qN4r0Uc3Dqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005172] Review Request: python-llvmpy - Python bindings for LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005172
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB)
or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 2416640 bytes in 171 files.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation
Rpmlint
---
Checking: python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc20.i686.rpm
python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
python-llvmpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US llvm - llama
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
-- Ignorable
Provides
python-llvmpy:
python-llvmpy
python-llvmpy(x86-32)
Unversioned so-files
python-llvmpy: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/llvmpy/_api.so
python-llvmpy: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/llvmpy/_capsule.so
-- Ignorable
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -rvn python-llvmpy-0.12.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386
Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG
***
APPROVED.
Suggestions:
1. %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch} can be %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}
2. Source can be Source0
3. Is it possible to use llvmpy as its %{name}? I think upstream won't release
2 version for py2 and py3 in parallel.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cwLJ439IDXa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 994152] Review Request: libprocess - Library that provides an actor style message-passing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994152 Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #11 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com --- re comment #10: requires stout-0.1.2-2.c784a5e.fc20 which is in koji and has been recently been submitted to testing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6r9jOPDL7Ma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005172] Review Request: python-llvmpy - Python bindings for LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005172 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Also if you think -doc is needed, please add -doc subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sAd5V4gVy5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005172] Review Request: python-llvmpy - Python bindings for LLVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005172 --- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Also again(sorry), I just checked documentation of llvmpy and found: python -c import llvm; llvm.test() is used for simple test, is it possible for you to add it into %check? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i2aR6ojXrOa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927461] Review Request: ros - The Robot Operating System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927461 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com Alias||ros -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fXWnskjmBPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972346] Review Request: ros-common_msgs - Common ROS Messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972346 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||ros-common_msgs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wVfDlDHCRIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915903] Review Request: qt5-qtjsbackend - Qt5 - QtJSBackend component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Bl7iIG6sMna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915909] Review Request: qt5-qtdeclarative - Qt5 - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=14SKrIbYYXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915909] Review Request: qt5-qtdeclarative - Qt5 - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gFeRoRfzj9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826520] Review Request: hiera - A simple hierarchical database supporting plugin data sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826520 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|hiera-1.0.0-3.fc18 |hiera-1.0.0-3.el6 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- hiera-1.0.0-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FOtys6o9eZa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822328] Review Request: libmediainfo - Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822328
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|cicku...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Drop the review, please ask others, sorry.
Only copy things generated before.
License check:
*No copyright* zlib/libpng
--
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/MediaInfoLib/Project/MSCS2008/Example/HowToUse_Dll.cs
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/MediaInfoLib/Project/MSCS2010/Example/HowToUse_Dll.cs
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/MediaInfoLib/Source/ThirdParty/tinyxml2/tinyxml2.cpp
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/MediaInfoLib/Source/ThirdParty/tinyxml2/tinyxml2.h
and
Public domain
-
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/BUILD/MediaInfoLib/Source/ThirdParty/md5/md5.c
Seems bundled libs/incorrect license tag.
==
Rpmlint
---
Checking: libmediainfo-0.7.64-3.fc20.i686.rpm
libmediainfo-devel-0.7.64-3.fc20.i686.rpm
libmediainfo-0.7.64-3.fc20.src.rpm
libmediainfo-devel.i686: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/libmediainfo-devel/Example/HowToUse_Dll.cs
Also, all files should be installed with -p option.
%post -n %{name} -p /sbin/ldconfig can just be
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Gn54vifkHYa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915903] Review Request: qt5-qtjsbackend - Qt5 - QtJSBackend component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1wS2SWzvy4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 912960] Review Request: rubygem-gdk3 - Ruby binding of GDK-3.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #30 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com --- Thread start: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-September/009486.html Email from me with patches that probably fix the code itself here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-September/009493.html Let me know if you need a direct copy of the patches since the mailman web archives have the patches inline. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GTuZPeFqMea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ovirt-engine-sdk-python Short Description: oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python) Owners: jhernand oschreib Branches: f18 f19 f20 el6 InitialCC: mpastern -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PwLnGMw8TGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #58 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- whoa, slow down. :) I've been meaning to work on epel-6 builds, but only *after* all the reviews were done. So, now that the deed is done, be aware I made some el6-related commits to master branch recently, if it all possible, please do make a best effort to keep master/el6 branches merged or mergeable. If branch-specific commits are required, please try to discuss it first. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=sSaUz68fbGa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- SCM request and review summary name don't match, please correct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=irjQ7wBOA5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QBDRc7tESHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #59 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- No problem :) I noticed the spec updates! I only need the four components at this time. Build is failing on ppc64 though :( In file included from tools/qcryptographichash.cpp:74: tools/../../3rdparty/sha3/KeccakF-1600-opt64.c: In function 'void KeccakAbsorb576bits(unsigned char*, const unsigned char*)': tools/../../3rdparty/sha3/KeccakF-1600-opt64.c:348: error: 'fromBytesToWord' was not declared in this scope http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=5905860name=build.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VYsz4wHVKya=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WOj82rkhd5a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005406] New: Review Request: python-happybase - Python library to interact with Apache HBase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005406 Bug ID: 1005406 Summary: Review Request: python-happybase - Python library to interact with Apache HBase Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dpri...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dprince/python-happybase.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dprince/python-happybase-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: Python library to interact with Apache HBase Fedora Account System Username: dprince This is an upcoming requirement of OpenStack Ceilometer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Pv63z4pFRPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005405] New: Review Request: python-thrift - Thrift Python Software Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005405 Bug ID: 1005405 Summary: Review Request: python-thrift - Thrift Python Software Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dpri...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dprince/python-thrift.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dprince/python-thrift-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: Thrift is provided as a set of Python packages. The top level package is thrift, and there are subpackages for the protocol, transport, and server code. Each package contains modules using standard Thrift naming conventions i.e. TProtocol, TTransport) and implementations in corresponding module (i.e. TSocket). There is also a subpackage reflection, which contains the generated code for the reflection structures. Fedora Account System Username: dprince - This is an upcoming requirement of OpenStack Ceilometer which requires python-happybase. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pYW88OfQuta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915903] Review Request: qt5-qtjsbackend - Qt5 - QtJSBackend component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qt5-qtjsbackend New Branches: el6 Owners: hobbes1069 InitialCC: Needed for future review request. Co-maintainers welcomed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GNnXG6AOpJa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972348] Review Request: actionlib - Interface for pre-emptible tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972348 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com Alias||actionlib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EuECOMItC6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 --- Comment #57 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=esdvHlx8eYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hwvUaqAWL6a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928584] Review Request: ros-std_msgs - Standard ROS Messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928584 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- This ticket has blocked another review for a long time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Fc0UOqKJuca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk-python - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iSpa6tvLnpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk-python - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2SGzKn5qB7a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005372] New: Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common Messaging library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005372 Bug ID: 1005372 Summary: Review Request: python-oslo-messaging - OpenStack common Messaging library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dpri...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dprince/python-oslo-messaging.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~dprince/python-oslo-messaging-1.2.0.a4.gb6d8087-0.1.230.b6d8087_d17ff27.src.rpm Description: OpenStack common Messaging library Fedora Account System Username: dprince This is based off of a master tarball on Sept 6th 2013. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iVrJM3Kohka=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005173] Review Request: SDL2_image - Image loading library for SDL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005173 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- SDL2_image-2.0.0-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SZKElJbdJna=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 927374] Review Request: rubygem-rugged - Ruby binding to the libgit2 linkable library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927374
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
|project.org |
--- Comment #17 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-rugged.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-rugged-0.19.0-3.fc20.src.rpm
- Added version to ruby(abi)
- Added %{?rubygems_default_filter} before description
- Added BR: git
-- didn't use /usr/bin/git because that would break on older Fedora versions
- Removed line where I was removing hidden files
- Added full test directory from github (Source1)
-- In comments say how I get and package Source1
-- Let developers know of gemspec bug, they have already thanked me and said
they will fix it.
- Remove BR: rubygem(test-unit)
- Fix up tests so they all pass
-- Added LANG variable
-- run git config --global user.name John Doe
Thanks for the help with the tests. I would have never found those missing
directories, and switching to minitest fixed the exit code problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ecUMWRjY2ca=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987884] Review Request: swizzle - Stream-based parsing code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987884 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2013-09-06 13:32:24 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1004997 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ubv3XXtZ33a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004997] Review Request: swizzle - Stream-based parsing code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004997 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- *** Bug 987884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SvzSAontjIa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 824218] Review Request: polly - Linux Twitter client designed for multiple columns of multiple accounts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824218 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(aal...@gmail.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8j2crCmZlWa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1004029] Rename Request: ovirt-engine-sdk-python - oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004029 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Rename Request: |Rename Request: |ovirt-engine-sdk - oVirt|ovirt-engine-sdk-python - |Engine Software Development |oVirt Engine Software |Kit (Python)|Development Kit (Python) Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ovirt-engine-sdk-python Short Description: oVirt Engine Software Development Kit (Python) Owners: jhernand oschreib Branches: f18 f19 f20 el6 InitialCC: mpastern -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rjcIycWscBa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928584] Review Request: ros-std_msgs - Standard ROS Messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928584 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- You're welcome to take over and continue the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U3z6amsr8Ca=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #56 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qt5-qtbase New Branches: el6 Owners: hobbes1069 InitialCC: Needed for future review request. Co-maintainers welcomed! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jfreIdQQzqa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 635256] Review Request: qtop - tool for monitoring PBS systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635256 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags||needinfo?(fo...@cern.ch) --- Comment #30 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- What's going on here? Have you found a sponsor? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nAMUwyLFEma=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005320] New: Review Request: openstack-puppet - Puppet modules used to install OpenStack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005320 Bug ID: 1005320 Summary: Review Request: openstack-puppet - Puppet modules used to install OpenStack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: roh...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://rohara.fedorapeople.org/puppet/openstack-puppet.spec SRPM URL: http://rohara.fedorapeople.org/puppet/openstack-puppet-2013.2-1.fc18.noarch.rpm Description: A collection of Puppet modules used to install OpenStack. Fedora Account System Username: rohara -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Yp0DOWY4Nva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 915909] Review Request: qt5-qtdeclarative - Qt5 - QtDeclarative component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915909 Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qt5-qtdeclarative New Branches: el6 Owners: hobbes1069 InitialCC: Needed for future review request. Co-maintainers welcomed! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=paeyUPkMPxa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973868] Re-Review Request: lifeograph - A diary program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973868 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc19|lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc18 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- lifeograph-0.11.1-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=diIFh3QAG9a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 980071] Review Request: python-xpyb - X Python Binding, based on the X C Binding (XCB) library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980071 Tomas Dabašinskas tdaba...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1005447 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DQTZ2jCtGYa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 878188] Review Request: qt5-qtbase - Qt5 - QtBase components
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878188 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | --- Comment #60 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- I guess there's also: tools/qregularexpression.cpp: In member function 'QRegularExpressionMatchPrivate* QRegularExpressionPrivate::doMatch(const QString, int, QRegularExpression::MatchType, QRegularExpression::MatchOptions, bool, const QRegularExpressionMatchPrivate*) const': tools/qregularexpression.cpp:1241: error: passing 'const QAtomicPointerpcre16_extra' as 'this' argument of 'T* QBasicAtomicPointerT::loadAcquire() [with T = pcre16_extra]' discards qualifiers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QYF56uzcE2a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 980168] Review Request: python-tornadIO2 - Socket.io server on top of Tornado framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980168 Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com --- Hello Richard! The spec and srpm is fine! PACKAGE APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i7RSgopP26a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989325] Review Request: libgme - Video game music file emulation/playback library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989325
Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[-]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libgme-
devel
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[-]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 92160 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is
[Bug 959942] Review Request: irker - IRC Message Relay
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959942 Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i3DIa4vy4va=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 989325] Review Request: libgme - Video game music file emulation/playback library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989325 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Thank you. I will fix wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding issues before import. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libgme Short Description: Video game music file emulation/playback library Owners: cicku Branches: f20 f19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=iV34OgUrOfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 994859] Review Request: python-pygit2 - Python bindings for libgit2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859 Yohan Graterol yohangratero...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=slYpXLj5zwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
