Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-25 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri Sep 23 19:08:44 2016 GMT+0200, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > > wrote: > > > > > > If there's another RC, please follow the naming con

Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-23 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 09/23/2016 01:27 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri Sep 23 19:08:44 2016 GMT+0200, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY >> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> If ther

Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-23 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 09/23/2016 01:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY > wrote: > > > If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we > agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX. > >

Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-23 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we > agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX. > > Note the .0 in there. > > 3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective. > > And be su

Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-23 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
If there's another RC, please follow the naming convention that we agreed on in the dim, distant past of 3.9.0rcX. Note the .0 in there. 3.9rcX (without the .0) is mildly annoying from a packaging perspective. And be sure that the GA is tagged and released as 3.9.0. We do have a history of usi

Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-22 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
I guess I am okay with this. I will let the others also express their opinions about this... On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We've tagged and released glusterfs-3.9

Re: [gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-22 Thread Amye Scavarda
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We've tagged and released glusterfs-3.9rc1. This is the 1st Release > Candidate for GlusterFS 3.9.0. > > https://build.gluster.org/job/release/171/console > http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/gluster

[gluster-packaging] glusterfs-3.9rc1 has been released for testing

2016-09-22 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Hi, We've tagged and released glusterfs-3.9rc1. This is the 1st Release Candidate for GlusterFS 3.9.0. https://build.gluster.org/job/release/171/console http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.9rc1.tar.gz The release-notes still need some work for a GA release: https://gi