Re: [packman] PMBS update step one finished

Hey, On 11.04.2017 15:45, Stefan Seyfried wrote: Yes, and they are closing all bug reports as "works for me" Since some time there are quite some more people working on OBS. Yours truly, and in  forever, is the boss of most of them. You might want to try again ;-) Henne -- Henne

Re: [packman] rebuilding gstreamer every day?

Hey, On 19.06.2016 21:36, Richard Brown wrote: UNTESTED and NOT SUPPORTED by the openSUSE Project (yet) You seem to misunderstand our relationship. Packman does not follow openSUSEs definition of tested and supported. The whole reason we have started this repo is because we don't :-)

Re: [packman] Kodi vs. ffmpeg 2.8

Hey, On 02.03.2016 14:06, Olaf Hering wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, Hendrik Vogelsang wrote: That sounds like a good idea. The trouble is that 2.6 and 2.8 use the same SONAMEs, so there is little gain in having a ffmpeg-2.6 pkg. That's why I said we should figure out how we can have multiple

Re: [packman] Kodi vs. ffmpeg 2.8

Hey, On 02.03.2016 14:00, Olaf Hering wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, Hendrik Vogelsang wrote: That sounds like a good idea. Done. Still I wonder why 2.8 makes trouble just now, its available since October. That might be but before your request[1] kodi explicitely required libavdevice 55.0.0

Re: [packman] Kodi vs. ffmpeg 2.8

Hey, On 02.03.2016 12:43, Olaf Hering wrote: On Wed, Mar 02, Hendrik Vogelsang wrote: On 29.02.2016 08:00, Olaf Hering wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, Hendrik Vogelsang wrote: this seems to be a bad combination as it leads to crashes in libavformat in av_opt_next whenever something tries to play

Re: [packman] Kodi vs. ffmpeg 2.8

Hey, sorry for the late answer, I was sick in bed... On 29.02.2016 08:00, Olaf Hering wrote: On Sun, Feb 28, Hendrik Vogelsang wrote: this seems to be a bad combination as it leads to crashes in libavformat in av_opt_next whenever something tries to play sounds. I think the bug

[packman] Kodi vs. ffmpeg 2.8

Hey, this seems to be a bad combination as it leads to crashes in libavformat in av_opt_next whenever something tries to play sounds. There are already some user reports for it in the kodi forum. http://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=238443=av_opt_next Building against FFMPEG 2.6 which is

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hey, On 23.02.2016 13:26, Markus Kohm wrote: I would definitively mimic the official packaging. Me too. But maybe pseudo-packages for groups of addons would be usefull, e.g. kodi-addons-video that requires all video addons but does not contain any addon, and a pseudo-package kodi-addons-all

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hey, On 22.02.2016 20:53, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Stefan Botter wrote: On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: 1. Do you think we should keep them in 2 separate projects or merge them to one ? 2. Should

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

Hey, On 16.02.2016 08:08, Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, Olaf Hering wrote: The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident. As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once everything

Re: [packman] Intro

Hey Fred, On 20.07.2014 16:41, Frederic Crozat wrote: I'd like to introduce myself for those who already don't know me Never heard of you ;-) I've created an account on PBMS (fcrozat) which need to be enabled and I have some packages I'd like to upload in Packman for everybody to use (ATM,

Re: [packman] Vivante graphics drivers

Hey, On 15.06.2014 11:33, Josua Mayer wrote: Now thats not a legal You are allowed to do it thing, but maybe you have someone on the packman team who can judge if it is okay to provide the vivante binaries on packman. Our general policy is: If unsure we distribute and see how it goes :-)

Re: [packman] Vivante graphics drivers

Hey, On 16.06.2014 11:21, Guido Berhoerster wrote: * Hendrik Vogelsang hvo...@hennevogel.de [2014-06-16 10:05]: On 15.06.2014 11:33, Josua Mayer wrote: Now thats not a legal You are allowed to do it thing, but maybe you have someone on the packman team who can judge if it is okay to provide

Re: [packman] too much updates

Hey, On 27.03.2014 17:21, Guido Berhoerster wrote: The alternative would be to have separate projects for each release and linking the Packman packages to the corresponding Packages in stable releases on OBS One of the main reasons for having Packman is to provide updates to the latest and

Re: [packman] branch from opensuse build service

Hey, On 07.01.2014 12:01, Diego Ercolani wrote: Is it possible to branch from pmbs a package obtained from obs or I can only get a copy from obs and then I have to commit a new project under pmbs? There is an inter-connect from the openSUSE OBS to PMBS. The project is openSUSE.org. E.g. osc

Re: [packman] History of Packman

Hey, On 23.11.2013 23:32, Hartmut wrote: thanks for that link, that is the look when I had my first contact with Packman. But what I'm looking for is the time, the Packman-team got together and the motivation and the dificulties and so on. The mailing list from December 2002 is very

Re: [packman] History of Packman

Hey, On 21.11.2013 18:30, Hartmut wrote: are there any web-pages about the history of Packman? No, why? :-) Henne -- Henne Vogelsang http://hennevogel.de To die. In the rain. Alone. Ernest Hemingway ___ Packman mailing list

Re: [packman] SLE 11

Hey, On 18.11.2013 09:04, Stefan Botter wrote: OK, this is a fine documentation on the support cycle. I do not know about the status of GA, but according to the SuSE website you can buy LTSS for up to 5 years support on any SP. No one that is using packman is using LTSS, trust me. LTSS has a

Re: [packman] Donations

Hey, On 25.03.2013 21:57, Dmitriy Perlow wrote: Is anyway to donate to packman team? Yes you can donate your time with package maintenance or mirroring for the project. Other donations we don't really accept. Henne -- Henne Vogelsang http://hennevogel.de To die. In the rain. Alone.

Re: [packman] Evergreen 11.4

Hey Wolfgang, On 29.10.2012 09:06, Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote: da wir openSUSE 11.4 im Rahmen des Evergreen-Projekts weiterhin mit Maintenance-Updates versorgen werden, würde ich gerne im Vorfeld schonmal darum bitten, dass die 11.4 Repositories, sofern machbar, weiterhin für die Benutzer

[packman] SLE11-SP2 enabled for Essentials

Hey, by popular request I have enabled a new build target for Essentials, SLE11-SP2. Currently there are a couple of crucial packages failing. If you can, have a look at failures please. I'll do so too :-) Henne -- Henne Vogelsang http://hennevogel.de To die. In the rain. Alone.

Re: [packman] [PM] MPlayer 1.0rc2_r29796-2.pm.3.2 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)

Hi, Kalle wrote: I have seen that you are the creator of MPlayer rpms on packman. To my knowledge 1.0 rc2 is about 2 years old. Is there any reason why the svn version isn't provided from time to time? It looks like that mplayer doesn't release new versions but just refers to the svn.

Re: [packman] KBasic

Hi, Илья Черных wrote: oldcpu wrote: KBasic does read like a very interesting package. I too would like to see it available as an rpm for openSUSE. It belongs to the KDE repo. Not here. Please talk to the KDE team. They have their list at opensuse-...@opensuse.org It does not belong to

Re: [packman] MPlayer

Hi, on 03/22/2009 04:31 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: Since I don't know when we finally release, I'd recommend to use latest svn (as a kind of prerelease), it should contain quite a few improvements compared to 27637, including vdpau. The update is already in our SVN. Just not build yet

Re: [packman] libusb - openSUSE 11.1

Hi, Lewis, Simon wrote: Apologies for contacting you directly. I know libusb is not your project but I and many others have problem with libusb in openSUSE 11.1 Excuse my maybe stupid question. Why don't you contact the responsible developer? :) You will find all necessary information on