On 2012-04-10 09:42:09 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org
wrote:
On 10 April 2012 05:39, rlee rleev...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is it possible to repackage VLC2.0 so that when one updates
they'll get the vlc-aout-pulse along with it instead of having to do this
On 10 April 2012 05:39, rlee rleev...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is it possible to repackage VLC2.0 so that when one updates
they'll get the vlc-aout-pulse along with it instead of having to do this
separately?
The package is fine. It's the repo that's broken:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Cristian Morales Vega
reddw...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 10 April 2012 05:39, rlee rleev...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is it possible to repackage VLC2.0 so that when one updates
they'll get the vlc-aout-pulse along with it instead of having to do this
For Suse users one needs to install vlc-aout-pulse through Yast or zypper.
read about it in the Suse Forums here:
http://forums.opensuse.org/english/get-technical-help-here/applications/474147-vlc-2-sound-problems-2.html
at post number 10.
My question is it possible to repackage VLC2.0 so that
Am 06.04.2012 01:46, schrieb Manfred Tremmel:
Am Freitag, 6. April 2012, 01:01:04 schrieben Sie:
1.1.20.1-60.2 from Packman
I can't belive, our current version for openSUSE 11.4 is 1.1.20.1-58.12
Whatever. The package says:
1.1.20.1-60.2
Fr 06 Jan 2012 18:33:08 CET
Sa 07 Jan 2012 20:43:35
Am 06.04.2012 10:20, schrieb Smartysmart34:
One thing that's missing now: Phonon-vlc-backend. That's bad because the
gstreamer fluendo thing doesn't work with some sort of mp3s.
Is there a plan to bring phonon-vlc back?
I just found an info that the phonon-vlc version required for VLC 2.0 is
On Thursday 05 April 2012 09:16:20 Pascal Bleser wrote:
JFYI, been working on vlc 2.0 the past few days.
I obviously started from dimstar's spec file but made a few
adjustments to build properly on all our distros in Essential,
and also enabled libtar support.
Hence I had to package a few
JFYI, been working on vlc 2.0 the past few days.
I obviously started from dimstar's spec file but made a few
adjustments to build properly on all our distros in Essential,
and also enabled libtar support.
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Pascal Bleser
pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
phonon-backend-vlc builds just fine with vlc-2.0.1 (just needs a
few changes to the spec file as it currently requires vlc
1.2). I can't test it myself, but I'll submit the changes and if
people notice that
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or
libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc...
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Cristian Morales Vega
reddw...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
the
Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleserpascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
the dependencies (those packages are named
On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org
wrote:
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
the
On 5 April 2012 14:27, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
There were some build errors for openSUSE 12.1. I think I fixed them,
but with vlc no longer working I cannot test the build, so there may
still be build errors. If the new version of the backend is not in
the repo by tuesday when
On 2012-04-05 15:54:17 (+0200), Christian ch...@computersalat.de wrote:
Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleserpascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1
Hi
Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?
Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2.
Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships different libs and
different versions of libs so ...
If you have a package build against SLE_11 SP1 that does not
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:43:58 +0200
Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org
wrote:
On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
reddw...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser
pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11,
On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ?
SP1 seems to be the oldest supported version. Building against it
warranties it will work with all the supported versions of SLE-11
(those being SP1 and SP2,
On 2012-04-05 16:02:30 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org
wrote:
On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ?
SP1 seems to be the oldest supported version. Building against it
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:09:29 +0200
Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org
wrote:
On 2012-04-05 16:02:30 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
reddw...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser
pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we
Hi all,
Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0.
I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52,
libavutil51, libxine1-codecs...
So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to the new version I will have to
uninstall libpostproc51 and if I do so libxine1-codecs is broken.
This is too
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 22:24:25 schrieb Smartysmart34:
Hi all,
Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0.
I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52,
libavutil51, libxine1-codecs...
So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to the new version I will have to
uninstall
Am 06.04.2012 00:29, schrieb Manfred Tremmel:
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 22:24:25 schrieb Smartysmart34:
Hi all,
Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0.
I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52,
libavutil51, libxine1-codecs...
So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to
Am Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:58:01 +0100
schrieb Ismail Doenmez idoen...@suse.de:
Thanks! How about VLC? :)
feel free...
Detlef
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Hello Ismail,
I got VLC 2.0 packaged by copying DimStar's (Dominique Leuenberger)
original spec file. There is just one problem our live.spec is a mess
(-devel package ships *.cpp and *.o files, include files are under
%libdir).
live-devel is no nice package, but it's only used for compiling
Hi;
Am Sun 11 Mar 2012 10:56:47 PM CET schrieb Manfred Tremmel
manf...@links2linux.de:
Hello Ismail,
I got VLC 2.0 packaged by copying DimStar's (Dominique Leuenberger)
original spec file. There is just one problem our live.spec is a mess
(-devel package ships *.cpp and *.o files, include
Am Sonntag, 11. März 2012, 22:58:01 schrieb Ismail Doenmez:
Hi;
Am Sun 11 Mar 2012 10:56:47 PM CET schrieb Manfred Tremmel
manf...@links2linux.de:
Hello Ismail,
I got VLC 2.0 packaged by copying DimStar's (Dominique
Leuenberger) original spec file. There is just one problem our
Hi all,
I got VLC 2.0 packaged by copying DimStar's (Dominique Leuenberger)
original spec file. There is just one problem our live.spec is a mess
(-devel package ships *.cpp and *.o files, include files are under
%libdir).
I am also willing to fix that but there might be some build
28 matches
Mail list logo
