, 2007 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Gary,
Do you have your computer incorporated into your Home Theater system?
That's
what I ultimately want to do, but when I did so a few months ago, my
computer screen didn't read well on a HD TV. The wife said all characters
: Cornell Ligon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Gary,
Do you have your computer incorporated into your Home Theater system?
That's
what I ultimately want to do, but when I did so a few months ago, my
Thanks, Cornell!
- Original Message -
From: Cornell Ligon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi Gary,
I had the same experience on the BK audio site as well. I'll hold on to
this email
list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:49:33 -0500
Well I like my home theater system. I play my music in surround sound, as
well as watching movies with it, and I think it sounds pretty good. I have
a Pioneer system
-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:59:52 +0200
Hi Cornell
The Nad c320b is an integrated amplifier. I do not need a home theter
system so I went for a simple amplifier to listen to music.
This is a very simple integrated amp with no bells
list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here is of course my PC with win xp and windows media
player 11.
I have a emagic emi 2/6 usb
Sent: 30 March 2007 04:48 PM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Andre,
No, I understood what you were stating, but Im such a junky for audio
equipment in any capacity and Im familiar with Nads reputation for keeping
things simple without too many
Hi Andre.
In my opinion windows media player provides a better listen than winamp.
There's really very little difference but specifically if you listen to live
albums or concept albums, windows media player is far superior to winamp in
playing the tracks seemlessly. I prefer windows media
I disagree with you about Windows Media. I feel it is the least
palatable of all the player options out there. As for CD's, you are
quite correct and there's no disputing you there.
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:55:02 +0100, Kevin Lloyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi Andre.
In my opinion windows
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kevin Lloyd
Sent: 28 March 2007 08:55 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi Andre.
In my opinion windows media player provides a better listen than winamp.
There's really very little difference but specifically if you
: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I disagree with you about Windows Media. I feel it is the least
palatable of all the player options out
I'm not a fan of windows media either.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I disagree with you about Windows
: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 04:10 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I'm not a fan of windows media either.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dana S. Leslie
Sent: 2007/03/28 12:32
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I agree with you, Bruce. Winamp sounds much better to me (with or without
equalizer) than either Windows Media Player
I think it all depends on your system. I remember
on my last system before this one, when I would
listen tto a live album, or any other album where
there was no gap between tracks on a cd, Winamp
would stop for aquick second, switch tracks and
continue. It was really annoying. On my current
Skarstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 05:40 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I think it all depends on your system. I remember
on my last system before this one, when I would
listen tto a live album
discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here is of course my PC with win xp and windows media
player 11.
I have a emagic emi 2/6 usb
Follows
From: André van Deventer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here
to put it mildly!!
Andre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Cornell Ligon
Sent: 29 March 2007 03:51 AM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi,
is the Nad a power amp or a receiver? In other words, do
19 matches
Mail list logo
