I know BW builds a specific model of desktop speakers with it's own
digital to analog converter. That's supposed to be the rolls roce of desk
top speakers according to the reviews!
AAnd most probably with the price of one too!
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
Then of course you have different types of computer speaker systems.
The Altec Lansing Expressionist Plus and Ultra are 2.1 channel speaker
systems meaning that they have a sub-woofer and 2 satellite speakers.
I'm not sure what type of system the model is you're referring to as
I've not seen
Hi Dane
This is a 2.1 system yes.
I think what happens with the BW system is that this specific company has
been known for its speakers for quite a few years now. So thy probably know
about speaker systems.
It has a USB port as well as an analog input port. And being a 2.1 system
it is very
Howdy!
Yep those speakers sound nice and I wouldn't have known about them had you not
mentioned them.
I can clearly see the advantages and I wouldn't say for one minute that the
Ltec Lansing 2.1 Expressionist Ultra system was perfect as its not but its damn
good for the price one would pay.
I can believe you!
It does seem as if the manufacturers who usually concentrate on hifi
equipment are now also starting to realise that many people spend quite a
lot of time listening to music on their computers. This means that we see
qite a lot of desktop systems now coming out from firms
Hi David,
Have you any idea what would cause this.
All going well, effectively chopped off front end of file saved as new name
then imported new file using open command to chop end off it.
However, I have tried this on a number of occasions and the converted MP3 file
to audacity format only
Hi Colin,
I'm not sure what's going on. Could you check the length of the audio after
you've first read the file into audacity, and then after you've chopped off the
first five minutes, and before you've exported or saved it. You can check the
length of the audio by:
1. press end to move to the
Hi Colin,
forgot to ask you what versions of windows and audacity are you using?
thanks,
David.
- Original Message -
From: Colin Phelan colin_phe...@pmlgroup.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2011, 13:48
Subject: RE: Audacity
Hi David,
David,
Version 1.3.13 beta with Win 7
Not grasped your last support instructions
With regard to length of file, would fully sighted person be able to view this
just by looking at screen do you know?
Thanks
Colin
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org
Hi Colin,
yes a fully sighted person would be able to see the length of the track, as
there's a time scale running across the window above the tracks. Couldn't you
find the selection start control?
David.
- Original Message -
From: Colin Phelan colin_phe...@pmlgroup.com
To: PC Audio
Thanks David,
Original file was 41 mins, next file 8 mins
Wanted sighted assistance to confirm speech output was correct if you know what
I mean.
Let me try again now I am getting to know programme better
Incidentally using supanova speech output says hms831
Thanks again
Colin
Hi all,
I thought I would try to make sense of Google Chrome using WE 7.2 on my
XP machine. Boy! Was I wrong!
Does anyone know how to get rid of Google Chrome off of my computer?
Add Remove doesn't do it either.
Then I thought to get on the web and look for info on how to uninstall
Hi all. I'm toying with the idea of experimenting with various media
players. Unfortunately not all are worth the trouble and still others are
not accessible with JAWS. At this time I use both VLC witch does a good
enough job and WMP which is fine but rather restrictive. I'm referring here
to
You're not going to hear any difference in sound quality from player to
player. The only ways to improve sound quality are to use uncompressed
files, or a better audio card. Winamp and Foobar 2000 are both very
accessible.
- Original Message -
From: Walter w...@blueyonder.co.uk
To:
I like Winamp because I can always go to the title bar and tell what's
playing. I have never figured out a way to get WMP to display that, unless
I am looking in the wrong place.
I like the Winamp Book feature, but I can't figure out a way to categorize
things.
To unsubscribe from this
I haven't tried all of the players you mentioned. But I have used WMP, Real
Player and Winamp; I like Winamp the best! For one thing, with Winamp, it's
quite easy to get from point A to point B in a file; you can adjust the
volume (without having to worry that you'll also mess up the volume
What are you looking for in a media player? I like Winamp because I can
manage my local libraries, my portable media players and my podcasts. I
also like the bookmarks feature and the ability to skip around in a
file. Handling content over the internet isv't very accessible though.
I like FooBar
Hi. Well mainly I want other options other than the two I currently use.
The ability to navigate with in a file and particularly the bookmark
facility would be most helpful. My main concern is just how accessible the
programme is with JAWS. Also, I understand there are plug ins for the
Walter: I would say that Winamp is most accessible; someone I know will
correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, no special scripts are needed
to do things like move within a file and so forth.
Tom Kaufman
- Original Message -
From: Walter w...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: 'PC Audio
It does use scripts, but they come with Jaws. Most plug-ins are free.
- Original Message -
From: Walter w...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 8:54 PM
Subject: RE: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
Hi. Well
Walter
Don't forget foobar2000 also. This is what I use for most of my playing.
The downside is that you have to designate your own shortcut keys but this
can be very easily done.
Another interesting option for really a very small fee is Mapler which is
a small media player written
Hi folks!
Yes I know most folks will now tell me that tis is an ancient and clumsy
machine but it seems a shame to throw the machine away simply because of
this. It is big yes but probably still one of the better mp3 players that
came out.
I think the batteries on my Iriver 320 has gon
Hello what is the website fore Mapler?
also can you send me off list your keyboard shortcut file fore foobar?
Hank
On 12/2/2011 9:57 PM, André van Deventer wrote:
Walter
Don't forget foobar2000 also. This is what I use for most of my playing.
The downside is that you have to designate your own
Website or Mapler is
http://www.mar-dy.com/MaPlEr/MaPlEr.php
You can actually download a demo from there which is fully functional except
for the fact that every 30 seconds or so you hear an announcement that you are
working with a demo.
I really feel that this little player is more than
24 matches
Mail list logo
