Hi WG,
This WGLC has ended. Thanks to all those who responded and provided feedback.
The authors have published a new version (-22). Those who provided
substantial comments (such as Tom Petch), please check if your
comments are handled.
Thanks
Dhruv & Julien
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:45 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].
Please indicate your support
be changed to "One
> BPI, EPR, or PPA object MUST be present and others should be ignored."
>
> Best Regards,
> Quan
>
>
>
>
> <<[Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
> < Tue, 16 May 2023 22:16 UTCShow header
> Hi WG, This email
...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to
the progression of the draft to RFC
one kind of BPI, EPR, or PPA object MUST
be present." It is a little confused. Maybe that can be changed to "One BPI,
EPR, or PPA object MUST be present and others should be ignored."
Best Regards,
Quan
<<[Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
< Tue,
>
Cc: pce-chairs mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>>;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call
: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip@ietf.orgSubject: [Pce] WGLC for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1]. Please indicate your support
or concern
Hi Dhruv and all, I read the last -21 version and support the publication of this draft as co-author.It describes another option for practical implementation of PCECC architecture in Native IP networks. Obviously a lot of work ahead but we need a basement: PCEP extensions and procedures to get it
On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:16 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep
Hi, Zhenqiang:Thanks for your support.Before we proposed and designed the solution that described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8821, and also the PCEP extension that described this WGLC document, we have analyzed the characteristics and challenges of SRv6 based solutions.As
Dhody
Date: 2023-05-17 06:15
To: pce
CC: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].
Please indicate your
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 6:15 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working
om petch
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>>;
pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Cc: pce-chairs mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>>;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org>
Subject:
Hi, Tom:
I think two phases approach may be more appropriate. As I replied you also in
the IDR list, we propose the following update later:
1) PCE sends the BPI object with PCInitiate message, then PCC replies with
“Ack, start BGP session”.
2) PCC reports the successful results to PCE
e@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
From: Pce <
version.
>
>
>
> Thanks all you together!
>
>
>
> Future reviews from other experts can be based on the updated version.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> Aijun Wang
>
> China Telecom
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
To: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>; pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
From: Aijun Wang
Sent: 24 May 2023 15:47
Hi, Tom:
As I explained in previous mail, the procedure of PCEP described in this draft
and the establishment of underlying BGP sessions that initiated by the BPI
object that included in the PCInitiate message is asynchronous.
The PCC will report the
ginal Message-----
> From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM
> To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
> Cc: pce-chairs ;
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip
;
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM
> To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
> Cc: pce-chairs ;
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pc
Hi, Tom:
As I explained in previous mail, the procedure of PCEP described in this draft
and the establishment of underlying BGP sessions that initiated by the BPI
object that included in the PCInitiate message is asynchronous.
The PCC will report the successful information only after the
Adding a new concern about session setup
From: Pce on behalf of tom petch
Sent: 22 May 2023 12:35
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15
I do not understand how this operates. I would expect there to be two phases.
first the boxes are configured with the information
com
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
From:
...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to
the progression of the draft
C for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
From: Pce < <mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org> pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of
Dhruv Dhody < <mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com> d...@dhruvdhody.com>
Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call fo
: Pce on behalf of tom petch
Sent: 22 May 2023 12:35
To: Dhruv Dhody; pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15
This email starts
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].
I had a look and decided that it is mostly beyond me - I am not up to speed
with all the 15 Normative References, in particular
Hi WG,
This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].
Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed
to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If
you support it, please indicate
28 matches
Mail list logo
