Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi WG, This WGLC has ended. Thanks to all those who responded and provided feedback. The authors have published a new version (-22). Those who provided substantial comments (such as Tom Petch), please check if your comments are handled. Thanks Dhruv & Julien On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:45 AM

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi WG, I have read the draft and I think that it is ready for WGLC. I support the WGLC. It is useful for PCEP extensions to set up TE paths in native IP networks. Best Regards, Changwang From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 11:16 PM To:

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi, Quan: Thanks for your support and suggestions! I have already updated the reference to RFC9050 as your suggestion. Regarding to the recommendation of second point, if it will not arise again the obscure of its meaning, keeping it simple will be better. If there is no more argument for

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi, I read through the document and I think that it is ready for WGLC. I support the WGLC. Best Regards, Shuping From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 11:16 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ;

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Dear Chairs and WG, I have read the new version and I support the WGLC. Some editorial suggestions are as following shown. In section 5.1, "Where: is as per [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller]." It may update to RFC9050. In section 5.1, "Further only one and one kind of BPI,

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

I support the WGLC. I read through the latest version of this document and I think it is useful to TE in native IP networks. Thanks, Mengxiao From: Pce mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:16 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi WG, I have read the draft. I think it should be moved forward. Best Regards, Ran - From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv DhodySent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:16 AMTo: pce@ietf.orgCc:

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi Dhruv and all, I read the last -21 version and support the publication of this draft as co-author.It describes another option for practical implementation of PCECC architecture in Native IP networks. Obviously a lot of work ahead but  we need a basement: PCEP extensions and procedures to get it

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi, All, I have read the latest version of this draft [draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-21]. I support it. Based on the PCEP extension defined in the draft, E2E traffic assurance in native IP networks can be achieved under central control mode. Best Regards, Yuanxiang From: Pce On

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi, Zhenqiang:Thanks for your support.Before we proposed and designed the solution that described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8821, and also the PCEP extension that described this WGLC document, we have analyzed the characteristics and challenges of SRv6 based solutions.As

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi All, I support it, I have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in my opinion. Scenarios to be addressed is described in RFC8735. Based on the progress of SRv6, I think SRv6 is an alternative solution. Best Regards, Zhenqiang Li li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com From: Dhruv

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi Everyone, I read through the document and support its WGLC. The document specifies the PCEP extensions to set up TE paths in native IP networks and to provide information/parameters for creating BGP sessions and advertising prefixes. It is useful and ready. Best Regards, Huaimo

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

om petch Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM To: Dhruv Dhody mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>>; pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> Cc: pce-chairs mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>>; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org> Subject:

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

 Hi, Tom: I think two phases approach may be more appropriate. As I replied you also in the IDR list, we propose the following update later: 1) PCE sends the BPI object with PCInitiate message, then PCC replies with “Ack, start BGP session”. 2) PCC reports the successful results to PCE

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

e@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20       From: Pce <

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

version. > > > > Thanks all you together! > > > > Future reviews from other experts can be based on the updated version. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Aijun Wang > > China Telecom > > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

To: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com>; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20  

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

From: Aijun Wang Sent: 24 May 2023 15:47 Hi, Tom: As I explained in previous mail, the procedure of PCEP described in this draft and the establishment of underlying BGP sessions that initiated by the BPI object that included in the PCInitiate message is asynchronous. The PCC will report the

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

ginal Message----- > From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM > To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org > Cc: pce-chairs ; > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

; > > -----Original Message----- > From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch > Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM > To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org > Cc: pce-chairs ; > draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pc

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Hi, Tom: As I explained in previous mail, the procedure of PCEP described in this draft and the establishment of underlying BGP sessions that initiated by the BPI object that included in the PCInitiate message is asynchronous. The PCC will report the successful information only after the

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

Adding a new concern about session setup From: Pce on behalf of tom petch Sent: 22 May 2023 12:35 From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15 I do not understand how this operates. I would expect there to be two phases. first the boxes are configured with the information

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

com -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 From:

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

I support the WGLC. The draft has been adopted for a long time, it should move forward, and I do not have concerns of the draft. Thanks, Cheng From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:16 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ;

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

the updated version. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WGL

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

: Pce on behalf of tom petch Sent: 22 May 2023 12:35 To: Dhruv Dhody; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15 This email starts

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 16 May 2023 23:15 This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1]. I had a look and decided that it is mostly beyond me - I am not up to speed with all the 15 Normative References, in particular