Hi PCE WG,
We have a few drafts update related to the WSON work.
- PCE requirement for WSON RWA has been revised. We added the signal
compatibility/processing requirement to match with the solution draft. The
co-authors believe this draft is now ready for WG LC.
Hi J-P and Julien,
I have made requests for time slots for three presentations before, but I just
wanted to make sure our presentation fits to the criteria.
*
PCE requirement for WSON RWA.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength/ (5 min,
presenter: Young)
Support
Young
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 4:27 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-07
Hi PCE WG.
The updated charter is on
Hi Ramon,
Thanks for your suggestion. I concur with your clarifying texts to keep the
consistency between this PCEP extension and the encoding draft.
Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Ramon Casellas [mailto:ramon.casel...@cttc.es]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:09 AM
To:
University Post and Telecommunication (BUPT), China)
Yang Richard Yang (Yale University, USA)
Workshop Organizing Committee
=
Young Lee, Huawei Technologies (leeyoung (at) huawei.com)
Luis M. Contreras, Telefónica I+D (lmcm (at) tid.es)
Andrea Fumagalli, The University
Hi,
I support this work. And there are a few of things that I'd like to add.
1. When we re-charter, I'd like the WG to consider the north-bound PCE
interface that would enable communication with Application layer. This may be
a deviation from the current PCE, but I think it may be worthwhile
Hi PCErs,
We have published a new draft that discusses how Stateful PCE can be used in
the data center networking environments in the spirit of cooperative
computation across network and application.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-cso-enabled-path-computation/
Thanks for
Hi Meral,
I agree with your analysis on Point #1. Many PCE implementations as far as I
know use this kind of mechanism in place. Regarding comment on the use of
crankback, this may not be the best mechanism to depend on especially when
dealing with restoration situations which is one of the
Hi PCE WG participants,
Here's a revived PCE draft to support impairment computation. Your comments are
always appreciated.
Young
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 1:25 PM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: ts...@kddilabs.jp
Hi Julien
Thanks for providing your useful feedback on the issues of the separation of
MPLS-TE version from GMPLS version of the solution draft for the stateful PCE.
I think the separation was tentatively agreed by the authors of the two
separate documents due to the differing interest of the
Hi Ed and Fatai
PCE cannot set these TE parameters per RFC4655. These TE parameters are passed
by PCC as part of the path constraints to which path computation would apply.
If any one of them cannot be met, the PCE will send the PCC with an indication
of ‘not finding a path’ or this sort.
I
Hi Dan,
I support your draft to be considered in the PCE WG especially in light of a
potential PCE WG re-chartering discussion.
There was a related draft that Dhruv presented in a previous PCE WG meeting.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-cso-enabled-path-computation/
I think
-based solutions [LSPA-ERO]
[RFC 4003].
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:52 PM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: ramon.casel...@cttc.es
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext-05
-computation-03.txt
We'd appreciate your comments/feedback in advance.
Best Regards,
Dhruv and Young
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 4:33 PM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: n.ciu...@nextworks.it; ogon...@tid.es; Dhruv Dhody; l
Yes, support.
Young
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:14 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG
document ?
Dear all,
There was a good consensus in
Yes, support.
Young (co-author)
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP
Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:18 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?
Dear all,
There was a good
Hi,
I support the idea of the need for Stateful PCE applicability. As stated in the
latest draft, this document is pivotal in providing an overarching stateful PCE
applicability to various scenarios. This draft should have preceded any other
stateful PCE related drafts, but it is not too late
.
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:12 PM
To: Zhangxian (Xian); Zhenghaomian; Zhenghaomian; Guoying Zhang; Leeyoung
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-lee-pce-app-oriented-arch-00.txt
A new version of I
Support.
Young
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:14 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Hi all.
Following the opposition
Support.
Young, as a co-author.
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien
Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:18 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-zhang-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-03
Hi again.
Hi,
Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft the IPR has been disclosed
in compliance with IETF IPR rules as follows:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_searchid=draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength
Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce
Support.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:12 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE
WG Document?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE
Support.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:48 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?
Dear WG,
As discussed during the PCE WG meeting
Hi Ramon,
Thanks for your comments. Please see inline for my response.
Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ramon Casellas
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:13 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of
Hi Cyril,
Thanks for providing your comment. Please see inline for my response.
Regards,
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cyril Margaria
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 7:04 AM
To: Julien Meuric
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call of
Hi Ramon and Cyril,
Thanks for providing valuable comments that improved clarity and readability of
the draft.
Let me know if this update is good to go or still needs further refinements.
Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hi Cyril,
Thanks for your comment. I will reflect the two changes in the next revision.
Please see in-line for my comment.
Regards,
Young
From: Cyril Margaria [mailto:cyril.marga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 3:48 PM
To: Leeyoung
Subject: Re: FW: FW: [Pce] I-D Action:
draft-ietf
Hi Julien,
This update reflects all the comments received from Cyril and Ramon as part of
the WG LC.
Cyril, please let the WG know if this update satisfies your comment.
Best Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hi Julien,
Let me know if there are any more remaining issues before closing WG LC for
this draft.
Thanks,
Young
From: Cyril Margaria [mailto:cyril.marga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:58 AM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: [Pce] I-D Action: draft
Hi Xian,
Thanks for posting your comments that are valuable. Please see inline for my
comments to yours.
Regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Zhangxian (Xian)
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:11 AM
To: Leeyoung; pce@ietf.org
Cc: Greg Bernstein; Zhenghaomian
Subject: RE: New Version
-data-00.txt
El 16/07/2014 0:48, Leeyoung escribió:
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele
Ceccarelli
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:16 AM
To: Zhangxian (Xian); Leeyoung; pce@ietf.org
Cc: Greg Bernstein; Zhenghaomian
Subject: Re: [Pce] New
of BGP-LS can
improve that of IGP-TE? Please correct me if my understanding is not wrong.
Thanks,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:35 AM
To: Jeff Tantsura
Cc: Leeyoung; pce@ietf.org; Greg Bernstein; Zhenghaomian
, August 01, 2014 4:02 AM
To: Leeyoung; draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelen...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-12.txt
Hi Young.
Thank you for the update. I think I can live with the Re-optimize
phrase as it is.
Just a few
I am not aware of any IPR that applies.
Thanks,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 10:28 AM
To: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensi...@tools.ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Last IPR Check on
Hi Oscar and Fatai,
I think the special case would be determined if the drafts have implementations
that have been shipped/deployed in production networks (which is above lab
trials) prior to the standardization.
So any notes to the WG with implementations in production networks will justify
Hi Adrian,
The update will be available soon. Thanks for your further comment. Please see
in-line for my response.
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 2:18 PM
To: Leeyoung; draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing
; Leeyoung; Takehiro
Tsuritani; Jonas Martensson; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios; Tomonori Takeda; Leeyoung;
Jonas Martensson; Takehiro Tsuritani; Greg Bernstein
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-14.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-14
-data-extn].
Your comments are welcome.
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 4:45 PM
To: Zhenghaomian; Zhenghaomian; Leeyoung; Leeyoung
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-lee-pce
Hi Julien,
Will you give us a slot for 10 minutes of the following two drafts (together)?
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data/
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn/
- Presenter (Dhruv/Young)
- Duration: 10 min
- As follow-up
, SERGIO (SERGIO)
Cc: Dhruv Dhody; pce@ietf.org; Leeyoung; Daniele Ceccarelli
Subject: RE: draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data-01.txt
draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-te-data-extn-01,
Hi Sergio,
[Adding WG in CC list]
Thanks for your mail, see inline...
From: BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO) [mailto:sergio.belo
Hi,
The major updates made with this revision are summarized as follows:
- Included the encoding mechanism using LSP attribute TLVs/ERO (as defined in
draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero) for encoding of wavelength assignments
in a PCRep message. (This was a pending issue, waiting for the
Hi All,
This conference may be relevant to your WG activities. Check it out!
Best regards,
Young
-
2nd IEEE CONFERENCE ON NETWORK SOFTWARIZATION - NetSoft 2016
Softwarization of Networks, Clouds and Internet of Things
SEOUL, KOREA
Hi,
The main change from the previous version was to point to the Wavelength
Selection TLV encoding from the WSON-Signaling draft and re-use the existing
encoding instead of introducing a different way.
And other changes were update the references that have become RFCs from drafts.
The
s.
Thanks & Best regards,
Young & Dhruv
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:05 AM
To: Daniele Ceccarelli; Leeyoung; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-leedhody-teas-pcep-ls-02.txt
A
Hi PCE WG,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce/
We'd like to solicit WG's comment on this draft. As Dhruv presented today in
the PCE WG meeting, this draft does not add any new protocol work. It is
informational only and the co-authors believe this draft can move
No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:57 AM
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Last IPR check for
Yes/support.
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 11:59 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-palle-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-09
All,
Hi,
Just to keep alive for this draft.
It is pending for chair's review. We'd appreciate if this draft can move to the
next stage.
Thanks.
Young and Ramon
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016
Support,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 4:43 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Hi all,
During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a
Hi Wei,
Thanks for your comment on Stateful H-PCE draft. Please see my comment on some
of your questions. Dhruv might also have his comments.
Best regards,
Young
From: weiw [mailto:w...@bupt.edu.cn]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:13 AM
To: Leeyoung; pce@ietf.org
Cc: Jonathan.Hardwick
Subject
Hi Jonathan,
I think your proposal makes a lot of sense in light of multiple H-PCE
implementations. I fully support this idea.
Related to this draft, we have presented in Yokohama and Buenos Aires the use
of H-PCE in stateful PCE environment
AM
To: 'weiw'; Leeyoung; pce@ietf.org
Cc: Dhruv Dhody
Subject: RE: [Pce] stateful-HPCE
Hi Wei,
Thanks for your comments.
In the Stateful H-PCE
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce-00] - we
describe the architectural considerations when Hierarchy of stateful PCEs
Hi Michael,
I think I am with you on your point. If we use rpc, it is clear. On the other
hand, if we were to use "stateful compute-only" it seems that the
system/controller has to keep the state of the paths somewhere which is not
YANG datastore. My understanding is that YANG datastore is
Igor,
In such case, would the YANG datastore be updated? I guess not. If not, then
the system/controller has to keep this interim state, would it?
Thanks.
Young
From: Igor Bryskin
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 2:34 PM
To: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Leeyoung; Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP
the customer decided not to instantiate the TE tunnel
(after the path compute request).
Thanks.
Young
From: Igor Bryskin
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:02 PM
To: Leeyoung; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP
(cc...@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org); m...@ietf.or
m]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:27 PM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: Igor Bryskin; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE); Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP
(cc...@ietf.org); pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org); m...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls]
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00
Yes/Support,
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 9:24 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwi...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption:
Hi,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks.
Young
From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:31 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; Daniele Ceccarelli
Adrian, thanks for pointing out the nits.
Will correct all the nits identified by the pointer.
Thanks.
Young
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 9:46 AM
To: 'Julien Meuric'; Zhenghaomian
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Yes/support.
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:39 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoi...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03
All,
Hi Julien,
I agree. A New flag on the object header (WA Object, I assume that is what you
are pointing to) where we have a flag to indicate if this is fixed (WSON) or
flexi-grid is reasonable instead of creating a new object for a new Spectrum
Assignment Object.
TLVs require a bit different
]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 11:35 AM
To: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaom...@huawei.com>; Leeyoung <leeyo...@huawei.com>;
Julien Meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com>; pce@ietf.org;
draft-lee-pce-flexible-g...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] 答复: My Comment on draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid
Hi all
I think there are much misunderstanding on what PCEP-LS is. Adrian pointed out
an accurate assessment of what PCEP-LS is doing with TE information:
>> In this network, the question to address is "How does the PCE learn the
>> topology of the TE network?" I believe that at least some of the
Hi,
This is to revive the draft with editorial updates.
Thanks,
Young (on behalf of co-authors/contributors)
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 1:51 PM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Yes/support
Young (co-author)
From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 7:25 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-h...@ietf.org
Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce
All,
This is
Yes/support
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 10:51 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-schedul...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Poll for adoption:
Just to refresh the draft,
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:40 PM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] I-D Action:
Hi,
The updated version is to update all the references and to clean up the text
for clarity. Please let us know if there is anything that needs to be added in
this draft. I am aware of one possible update need for SRP Object to indicate
bi-directional LSP setup (which Adrian posted recently).
Hi,
Yes/support.
Thanks,
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 7:34 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03
Dear
That's great, thanks.
From: Cyril Margaria [mailto:cmarga...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 1:16 PM
To: Leeyoung
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions
I started to process the comments, I will distribute a draft by tomorrow
Hi Cyril,
We are waiting for the update of the draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions. What
is your plan for this draft? Please let us know if you have time to update this
draft within a few week; otherwise send me the original file so that I can help
update the draft.
Thanks & Best regards,
Yes/support.
Thanks
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 9:05 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04
: Monday, February 26, 2018 10:36 AM
To: Zafar Ali <z...@cisco.com>; Oscar de Dios <ogon...@tid.es>; Zhangfatai
(Fatai Zhang) <zhangfa...@huawei.com>; Zhangxian (Xian)
<zhang.x...@huawei.com>; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios <ogon...@tid.es>; Leeyoung
<leeyo...@huawei.
-Original Message-
From: Leeyoung
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 1:07 AM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' ; Igor Bryskin
Subject: RE: VN Association @ PCE
Hi Dhruv,
Igor agreed with the proposal.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Leeyoung
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 11:06 PM
To: 'Dhruv
Yes/support.
Young
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 8:19 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-zhang-pce-resource-shar...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-07
Hi PCE
Hi Watson,
Sorry for the late response to your review. I thank you for your review of
this draft and the result.
In regards to your question, please see below inline.
Thanks & Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Watson Ladd [mailto:watsonbl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,
Hi,
Yes, Support.
Thanks.
Young (co-author)
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 7:05 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw
Dear WG,
We discussed about
Hi Deborah,
Thanks a lot for your good comments. We will address your comments as soon as
we can and get back to you in a timely manner to keep pace with the progress of
draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions.
Best regards,
Young
From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3...@att.com]
Sent: Friday,
Hi Adrian,
Thanks a lot for your review of the draft. We will get back to you with our
comments as soon as possible with hopefully an updated version.
Thanks & best regards,
Young (on behalf of co-authors).
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 4:32 PM
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for approving the changes. The revision has been published.
Best regards,
Young
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 12:10 PM
To: Leeyoung ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-applicability-a...@ietf.org; 'Dhruv Dhody'
; 'Daniele
Hi WG,
This version merged two WG drafts as one for Stateful PCEP for GMPLS per WG
chairs' suggestion.
Note that we have two WG drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-10 and
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-06
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your thorough review of this draft. The authors will definitely
address the changes your pointed out. The best scenario is the adoption and
then update these changes.
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your comments. All the nits pointed out are corrected. We will
upload the revision once we have resolved Adrian's second comments.
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of dan...@olddog.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, February
Hi Dhruv,
Yes, that is great idea. As soon as pce-wson draft is finalized, we will
address Adrian's WG chair's comment and make it stable.
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 10:50 PM
To:
Hi Adrian,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 7:32 AM
To:
Hi Gabrielle,
Thanks for your review and comment.
I agree with you on both points. We will fix in the revision.
Best regards,
Young
From: Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe) [mailto:ggali...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 4:25 AM
To: Leeyoung ; adr...@olddog.co.uk; pce@ietf.org
Cc
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your quick reply and approval.
Hopefully, more comment will come from implementers to improve the draft.
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 8:14 AM
To: Leeyoung ; pce@ietf.org
,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel
Sent: 05 December 2018 18:17
To: 'Leeyoung' ; 'pce@ietf.org'
Subject: RE: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-09.txt
While I'm on a roll reviewing PCE documents, and while Young is being active, I
just had a look at his new
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your chair's review. Please see inline for my comment. 01 version
has been uploaded (please see the attachment).
Note: I might have made mistakes as I was rush to meet the deadline :)
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel
Hello ADs,
The revision was published to incorporate all your comments and Julien's
suggestions (as PCE co-chair) since version 12. Specifically, the update
reflects:
On Benjamin's comment on the "identifier": RFC 6205 says that the
Hi Alissa,
Thanks for your ballot. I will incorporate the due updates as part of the IESG
update in version 12.
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:ali...@cooperw.in]
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 1:24 PM
To: Leeyoung ; Elwyn Davies
Cc: gen-...@ietf.org
Hi Alexey,
My apology for the delay in responding to your comment. Please see inline for
my response.
Thanks.
young
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelni...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 4:34 AM
To: Leeyoung ; The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-...@ietf.org; Daniele
:45 PM
To: Ramon Casellas ; Leeyoung
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-14.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-14.txt
has been successfully submitted by Young Lee and posted to the IETF repository.
Name: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your comments. Please see in-line my response to each of your
comments. Please let me know if you have further comments.
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 9:06 PM
To: The IESG
Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for your comments. Please see in-line for my response to each of your
comments. Please let me know if you would have further comments.
Thanks & best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February
Hi Alexey,
Thanks for your comments. Please see in-line for my response to each of your
comments. Please let me know if you would have further comments.
Thanks & best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelni...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Mirja,
Thanks for your comments. Please see in-line for my response to each of your
comments. Please let me know if you have further comments.
Thanks & Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Mirja Kühlewind [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net]
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019
Hi Adrian,
Yes/Support. We have a plan for implementation for this.
Thanks (as co-author).
Young
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 8:16 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption poll for
Hi Elwyn,
Thanks for further review and confirming the acceptance of the most of the
edits while pointing out a few items to be corrected. I will update those
during the IESG review.
Best regards,
Young
-Original Message-
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
Sent:
99 matches
Mail list logo
