Hi J-P and Julien, I have made requests for time slots for three presentations before, but I just wanted to make sure our presentation fits to the criteria.
* PCE requirement for WSON RWA. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength/ (5 min, presenter: Young) PCE requirment for RWA (working group document) - we request for 5 minutes to give the update newly added requirement (signal compatibility/processing) to align with the extension draft --- Last time, I asked for the WG LC and Julien asked me to align with the solution draft to make sure all the requirements are covered and this revision has fulfilled it. The co-authors believe this draft is ready for WG LC. * PCEP extension for WSON RWA. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext/ (5 min, presenter: Oscar) We have much private discussions on PCEP ext. for RWA in WSON among the co-authors to make sure we'd avoid duplicate effort from the PCEP ext for GMPLS. It is worth to present the progress. If you want, we can forward the thread of emails on this discussion. Please let me know if that is necessary. * PCEP extensions for WSON Impairments. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-pce-wson-impairments/ (5 min, presenter: Young) In regards to Impairment-aware PCE, we have discussions in CCAMP mailing list on this topic and the PCE mailing list was also CC'ed for some of the discussions Julien raised on the PCE related things on the Impairment Framework. We have cut down many of the PCE related portion from the framework document in this new revision, so please give us 5 minutes for the update. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:07 AM To: [email protected] Cc: Daniel King Subject: [Pce] Rules to request a "slot" during PCE WG Meetings Dear all, Julien and I have been having a discussion on how to better manage our WG meeting time. As a matter of fact, a number of requested slots are related to IDs that were already "presented" during previous IETF meetings, refreshed just before the cut-off submission date without discussion on the mailing list ... As a gentle reminder, the aim of WG meetings is to discuss open issues that could not be resolved by email attempting to reach a consensus, to be confirmed on the mailing list. You may want to also refer to a similar discussion that we had during the Routing Area meeting at the last IETF. Few points here: 1) If your ID falls into the WG charter, it is perfectly fine to get a "presentation" slot when first posted (rev -00) if time permits (priority will be given to slots allocated to resolve technical issues discussed on the mailing list). Although people attending the WG meeting are supposed to have read each document, you may want to explain the issue that you are trying to solve, and how. 2) Before requesting a slot, please make sure that your intent is to discuss specific technical issues related to the document that could not be resolved on the mailing list. In other words, please do not request slots for IDs for which no discussion took place on the mailing list. With that in mind, could you please send us your slot request no later than Monday July 18 at noon ET? Julien and I will publish the WG meeting agenda the day after, with some delays but hopefully an improved agenda. Many Thanks. JP and Julien.
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
