Support for its forwarding.PCEP has almost all the corresponding parts of BGP to control the devices, implement and deploy the PCEP-LS can assist the simplification of SDN controller/PCE.Aijun WangChina TelecomOn Apr 13, 2024, at 00:34, daniele.i...@gmail.com wrote:Hi Julien, all, Adrian got the
Hi Andrew,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Apr 5, 2024, at 23:14, Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote:
>
>
> Hi Authors,
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft
Support for its forwarding.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表
Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2024年3月7日 18:21
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce
Hi, Ned:
Thanks for your review.
Some detail replies are inline below.
If you have no further comments, I will upload it to address your
concerns/comments then.
Aijun Wang
-邮件原件-
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org]
代表 Ned Smith via Datatracker
发送时间
Hi, Sheng:
Thanks for your review.
I have updated the draft to address your concerns/comments, and will upload
it together with other reviews.
Aijun Wang
-邮件原件-
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org]
代表 Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
发送时间: 2024年1月30日 22:56
.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
发件人: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
发送时间: 2023年12月28日 20:09
收件人: Aijun Wang
抄送: pce@ietf.org
主题: Re: [Pce] 答复: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-28.txt
Hi Aijun,
I did one more pass. This time I have gone
nition of
"error code"
3) Some editorial updates.
Please let me know if the above updates address your concerns?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-邮件原件-
发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org]
代表 internet-dra...@ietf.org
发送时间: 2023年11月15日
-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/
- the expected presenter name: Aijun Wang/China Telecom
- will you be attending in-person or remote: In-Person
- the requested duration, including question time as part of the slot: 15
Minutes
- the reason why you want to be on the agenda; What do you want
style to reflect the time relationship between these messages.
2. BPI object encoding format to include the status field to reflect the
BGP session status during the procedures.
3. Management Considerations.
Detail responses are inline below.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Aijun Wang
> On Sep 26, 2023, at 05:16, Andrew Stone (Nokia)
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft,
Hi, Ines:
Thanks for your review. I have updated the draft according to your suggestions.
The detail replies are inline below:
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-邮件原件-
发件人: Ines Robles via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2023年7月22日 0:47
收件人: rtg-...@ietf.org
抄送: draft
al Control Dynamic Routing (CCDR). The PCEP extensions are developed in the PCE Working Group.ENDI made this change in GitHub - https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/tree/mainThanks! Dhruv & JulienOn Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:47 AM Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> wrote:Hi
Routing (SR), Native IP, BIER, Detnet and other possible forward
data plane.
2）Add one items in the “Milestone”
è July 2023 Submit PCEP extension for Native IP as a Proposed Standard
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org
/PCInitiate Message.
In the "Abstract" and "Introduction" parts, the corresponding sentences have
all no such explicit statements.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-邮件原件-
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
julien.meu...@orange.com
发送时间: 2023年
issues, we will try to move forward (the IESG review)
then.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of
internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 11:01 AM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] I-D Action
for this simplification, we will update document
later accordingly.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On May 31, 2023, at 11:15, xiong.q...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
> Dear Chairs and WG,
>
> I have read the new version and I support the WGLC.
> Some editorial suggestions are as following shown
Hi, Zhenqiang:Thanks for your support.Before we proposed and designed the solution that described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8821, and also the PCEP extension that described this WGLC document, we have analyzed the characteristics and challenges of SRv6 based solutions.As
.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On May 24, 2023, at 23:45, tom petch wrote:
> From: Aijun Wang
> Sent: 24 May 2023 15:47
>
> Hi, Tom:
>
> As I explained in previous mail, the procedure of PCEP described in this
> draft and the establishment of underlying BGP sessions that
nnect.com> wrote:
From: Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn>
Sent: 24 May 2023 16:02
As I remember, it is the IANA first allocate the necessary values, then go to the RFCEditor.
As I remember, it is the IANA first allocate the necessary values, then go to
the RFCEditor.
Can we ask the IANA to (early) allocate the value now?
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On May 24, 2023, at 17:12, tom petch wrote:
>
> From: Aijun Wang
> Sent: 23 May 2023 07:59
consider add some extra state reports from the PCC.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On May 24, 2023, at 17:24, tom petch wrote:
>
> Adding a new concern about session setup
>
> From: Pce on behalf of tom petch
> Sent: 22 May 2023 12:35
> From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
>
the updated version.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of tom petch
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 7:35 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGL
Hi, Hari:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Hariharan
Ananthakrishnan
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 11:16 AM
To: wang
Hi, All:
We have made some updates again to prepare for the WGLC.
Any comments are welcome.
We would also like to ask the Chairs to start the WGLC in recent days.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf
of the optional fields,
and will be easier for future extension.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of
julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:39 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf
Hi, All:
I support its adoption.
One questions to the authors:
Is it enough that only the headend support the defined iFIT capabilities?
What’s the procedures when the nodes on the LSP/SR path doesn’t support the
defined iFIT capabilities?
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
发件人: Dhruv
Hi, Andrew:
I think the update contents will be helpful for the reader to understand the
usage of "UNPROCTED MANDATORY" and "UNPROTECTED PREFERRED" type.
Support for its forwarding.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-邮件原件-
发件人: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:an
Hi, Andrew:
Thanks for your explanation.
I think adding these descriptions into the document would be helpful to the
reader to know the necessary of the protocol extension.
I support its forwarding.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Jun 10, 2022, at 23:20, Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ott
of protocol.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Jun 7, 2022, at 17:19, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> This message starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call
> fordraft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement-05 [1].
>
> Please share your comments using the PCE mai
object, but currently I don’t see the
image, why don’t we keep the thing simple.
And, I support the forwarding of this draft. The current flag field has no room
for further extension.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On May 12, 2022, at 11:59, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
>
> Hi Aijun,
the fixed length(then the length field is unnecessary) and
clear description/usages of each bit of the flag.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On May 11, 2022, at 21:28, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-lsp
for the Path MTU
calculation”, which can include the some contents in section 3.1, section 3.2,
section 3.5
3. Section 3.3 and 3.4 should be put in one independent section, such as
“Application of the Path MTU Metric”?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org
Hi, WG:
I have read this draft and support its publication with the following
suggestions from Adrian Farrel.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 4:39 PM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' ; pce@ietf.org
Cc
and PCE get the key
points of this solution.
Thanks for your efforts.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 10:34 PM
To: 'Aijun Wang'
Cc: pce@ietf.org; 'idr-chairs' ; 'pce-chairs'
; 'Dongjie (Jimmy)'
Subject: RE: [Pce] draft-ietf
Hi, Susan:
Thanks for your suggestions. I have uploaded the updated version of the draft.
Wish to get your thorough review for this document.
I am glad to make a short presentation on the IDR interim meeting on 10/11 for
the overall solutions.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China
Hi, Susan:
Thanks for your review!
Detail responses are inlines below.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Jul 30, 2021, at 05:50, Susan Hares wrote:
>
>
> Aijun:
>
> I apologize for missing PCE session today. I re-injured a knee just before
> the session. Let me pr
/slides-111-p
ce-sessa-21-native-ip-00.pdf).
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: Susan Hares
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 5:58 AM
To: 'Aijun Wang' ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'idr-chairs' ; 'pce-chairs'
Subject: RE: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-14
ill update the draft later together with the comments from Susan.
Thanks for your comments, would like to see your more suggestions on the
solution.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: mkold...@cisco.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 8:41 PM
To: Aijun Wang ; 'Mike Koldychev (mkoldych
Hi, Susan and all:
Update one hyperlink on the contents, please refer to this mail for comments
responses.
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:04 PM
To: 'Susan Hares' ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'idr-chairs' ; 'pce-chairs'
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft
Hi, Susan:
Thanks for your reviews, let me first address your current questions and
wait for the further discussions on the overall solution.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 7:19 AM
To: pce
Hi, Mike:
Thanks for your questions. Please see the replies inline.
If you have more questions based on the followings answers, we can discuss
them accordingly.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Mike
Koldychev (mkoldych)
Sent: Tuesday
fftype=--hwdiff=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exte
nsion-native-ip-14.txt
Look forwards to your comments on these changes.
And, if there is no comments on the above updates, we would like to ask the
WG to begin the WG Last Call for this document.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-
Hi,
Also as a telco, we are expecting the implementation of PCEP-LS, and once it is
ready, we will try to deploy it in the network.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of ???(Naas
Transformation ?)
Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 9:14 AM
Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 12:48 PM
To: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-policy wiki comments and action.
Hi Hooman,
On Thu, Mar 18
on
to a LSP? Instead of the implicit method that depending on the presence of
TE-PATH-BINDING TLV as described in current draft?
4. For BT=0, the length is set to 7. How to skip the padding trailing zeros
to a 4-octet boundary when parsing?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Me
Hi, Dhruv:
Yes, support its adoption.
I think the extension can give more spaces to describe the future state of LSP.
One question, is it necessary to be variable length? How to keep align when the
bit position is fixed but the length is variable?
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Feb 16, 2
esentation in coming IETF meeting.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org On Behalf Of
internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 11:58 AM
To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ex
e returned error information
blends them together again.
Can we define some new error-value to reflect them more clearly? I think the
parser of the association policy can give the detail information.
And, seems no authors of this draft to response these questions?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
Chi
ssociation requirements can't be
accomplished by the SVEC object, and can only be done via PAG, the document may
be more convincible.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 12:40 PM
To:
ization work? What's the reason not to standardize this?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv
Dhody
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:42 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@
the error type and error value for the related procedures.
Detail discussions are undergoing offline continuously, wish also to hear
the comments from PCE experts.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun
Hi, Shuping:
Please see the responses inline, wish to see the update of the draft soon.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
From: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) [mailto:pengshup...@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 7:46 PM
To: Aijun Wang ; julien.meu...@orange.com;
pce
such
information for each PCC from its appointed label space?
6. For definition of CCI object, will it simplify the overall procedures if
the CCI object for MPLS label includes both the IN and OUT label together?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message
Hi, Loa:
Thanks for your review. We have updated the draft accordingly.
Detail responses are inline below.
I also includes the word responses for your reference.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun
Hi, Loa:
Thanks for your review.
We will update the draft in next week to reflect your comments. The detail
responses will also be provided later.
Comments from other experts are also welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
-Original Message-
From: teas
the above documents, but these enhancements is not the main part of this
draft?
Best Regards
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv
> Dhody
> 发送时间: 2020年6月7日 15:45
> 收件人: pce@ietf.org
> 主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll
Yes/Support.
This draft gives operators the flexibility to schedules the LSP resource on
demand.
Best Regards.
Aijun Wang
-邮件原件-
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
julien.meu...@orange.com
发送时间: 2019年12月6日 0:47
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG LC for draft
Yes/Support.
Aijun Wang
-邮件原件-
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
julien.meu...@orange.com
发送时间: 2019年9月26日 0:21
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
Hi PCE WG,
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been
Yes/Support.
I think such mechanism is necessary for the interoperation of SR and
RSVP-TE, and can overcome some shortcomings of SR technology.
Aijun Wang.
-邮件原件-
发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2019年8月21日 1:45
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce
larify the
relationship between the SVEC object and the association type, if any.”
As the VN creation request if from the customer, can the
“Requestion-ID-number” be used to association these PCE initiated
associated LSPs? Add some text to clarify this may be more helpful.
Best Regards.
Aiju
Yes/Support.
This draft give controller the capabilities to design the SRv6 Path via PCEP
protocol.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Feb 22, 2019, at 22:51, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>
> Yes/support. This is a very important companion draft to
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing.
>
&
Message implementation experiences.
Best Regards.
Aijun Wang
Network R and Operation Support Department
China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.
-邮件原件-
发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2018年11月16日 15:59
收件人: i-d
.
Best Regards.
Aijun Wang
Network R and Operation Support Department
China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute,Beijing, China.
发件人: Jonathan Hardwick
[mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch@dmarc.ietf.org]
发送时间: 2018年10月13日 22:47
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: draft-zhao-pce
Yes/Support
发件人: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
发送时间: 2018年2月20日 21:34
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03
Dear PCE WG
This is the start of a two week
lly-control-dynamic-routing-scenario-simulation-and-suggestion-01.pdf>
.
We have also compared the different approach protocols to fulfill them, and
think PCEP may be the most candidate protocol to accomplish them.
Best Regards.
Aijun Wang
Network R and Operation Support Department
solution is at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-teas-pce-native-ip-01,
and the initial introduction slides can be accessed at
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/slides/slides-96-teas-10.pdf
Best Regards.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom Beijing Research Institute
Network R and Operation
66 matches
Mail list logo
