Hi Chairs, WG,
I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2995/
Thanks,
Rakesh
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 12:05 AM
To: "=SMTP:rgandhi@cisco. com" , Colby Barth
, "bin_
Hi WG, Chairs,
I have read the latest version of the document and believe it is ready for
publication.
Thanks,
Rakesh (as a co-author)
On 2020-10-05, 1:17 PM, "Dhruv Dhody" wrote:
Hi WG,
This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir [1]. Plea
Thank you Dhruv for the detailed review and comments. Latest revision is
uploaded that addresses your review comments:
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-09
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-09
Please see
Happy New Year!
Many thanks Harish for the RtgDir review. Please see replies inline with …
From: Harish Sitaraman
Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 6:07 PM
To: rtg-...@ietf.org
Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org ,
draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org
, pce@ietf.org
Subject: RtgDir review: dr
Thank you Eric for the review comments.
We have posted a new revision that address the comments:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13
Please see inline with …
Thank you Alvaro for the review comments.
We have added a Section 3.5 - Operational Considerations in the new revision to
address the comment.
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-
Thank you Benjamin for the review comments.
We have posted a new revision that address the comments:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13
Please see inline wi
Thank you Murray for the review comments.
We have posted a new revision that address the comments:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13.txt
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-13
Please see inline with
Thank Martin for the review comments.
This was an error text as there is no reporting for tail-end/reverse LSPs on
egress nodes. Fixed in the latest (rev 14) version.
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-14.txt
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rf
Hi WG,
Support the WG adoption.
One comment: May want to identify the exact IANA registry names in Section 8
that need to be updated.
Thanks,
Rakesh
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Date: Monday, October 18, 2021 at 8:34 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-hsd-pce-sr-p2mp-pol...@ietf.org
Subj
Support.
Thanks,
Rakesh
On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" wrote:
>Dear WG,
>
>We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting
>draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work
>has considerably progressed in other WG.
>
>Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivab
Support.
Thanks,
Rakesh
On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" wrote:
>Dear WG,
>
>We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting
>draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work
>has considerably progressed in other WG.
>
>Are you in favor of adopting draft-siv
Thank you Luyuan for providing review comments on the
draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth.
Adding PCE WG.
Thanks again,
Rakesh (for authors)
From: Luyuan Fang mailto:luf...@microsoft.com>>
Date: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 8:14 PM
To: Rakesh Gandhi mailto:rgan...@cisco.com>>, Dhruv Dhody
Hi Loa,
Please see inline with .
On 2017-05-05, 4:22 AM, "Pce on behalf of Loa Andersson" wrote:
Folks,
I see no problem progressing this draft, the licensing terms are OK.
Great, thanks.
However there is another problem.
The disclosed IPR was applied for in 200
HI WG,
This draft was presented at the last IETF meeting (in Chicago). The draft has
been updated as following:
Added text in Sections 1, 3.1 and 3.2 for Fast reroute procedure (using
ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr)
Added path requests with Stateless PCE
Various editorial changes
We welcom
Hi WG,
This draft was presented at the IETF meeting in Chicago. The draft has been
updated as following:
Misc. editorial changes and updated references.
Clarified tunnels for forward and reverse LSPs and updated error handling.
Alignment with the draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04
- Removed
Hi WG, Julien,
Yes, Support the adoption of this important draft.
Thanks,
Rakesh
On 2018-01-22, 10:05 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote:
Hi all,
Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear
interest. Since then, the authors have done their homewor
Hi Julien, WG,
Yes/support. Very important base document for many other documents for LSP
association (such as draft-barth-pce-association-bidir).
Thanks,
Rakesh
On 2018-02-01, 9:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote:
Hi all,
This message initiates a 2-week WG last call
Adding Dhruv, most likely Dhruv requested for it.
On 2018-03-27, 10:12 AM, "Julien Meuric" wrote:
Hi all,
As mentioned during our session in London, we have received a request
from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp for an early code
point allocation.
R
Hi WG, Chairs,
Yes, support.
Thanks,
Rakesh
From: Pce on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 7:09 AM
To: "pce@ietf.org" ,
"draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org"
Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
draft-ananthakri
Hi WG,
FYI: This draft has been updated to align with the latest version of
draft-ietf-pce-association-group. The changes mostly editorial in nature.
Authors believe the document is ready for WG adoption.
Welcome your review comments and suggestions.
Thanks,
Rakesh (for authors)
On 2018-03-2
Hi WG, Chairs,
Yes/support (as a co-author).
Thanks,
Rakesh
From: Pce on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick
Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 10:04 AM
To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org"
Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-as
Hi Dhruv,
Many thanks for your review and suggestions.
Please see inline with …
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: Monday, April 16, 2018 at 5:06 AM
To: Jonathan Hardwick , "pce@ietf.org"
, "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org"
Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: WG adoption poll for draft-b
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your review of the document.
Please see inline with …
From: "=SMTP:mtaillon@cisco. com"
Date: Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM
To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org"
, "pce-cha...@ietf.org"
Cc: Jonathan Hardwick , Ravi Singh
Subject:
Hi Julien,
Apart from the disclosure #2996 below, I am not aware of any other IPR that
applies to this draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2996/
Thanks,
Rakesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> julien.meu...@orange.com
> S
Hi Julien, WG,
I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication.
Thanks,
Rakesh (as a co-author).
On 2018-12-13, 8:29 AM, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote:
Hi all,
This e-mail starts a 3-week PCE WG Last Call on
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwi
Hi WG, Chairs,
We have updated the draft to incorporate couple of review comments from Marina
Fizgeer, namely,
1) Show the direction of LSP from PCC point of view in Fig. 2 and 3 (as opposed
to PCE point of view which may be confusing).
2) Clarify PLSP-ID for bidirectional LSP in Section 5.5.
A
Hi Hari,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks,
Rakesh
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 10:49 AM
To: "chengl...@huawei.com" , "mach.c...@huawei.com"
, "chengweiqi...@chinamobi
28 matches
Mail list logo