On 16/12/2006, at 23.47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The IEMGUIs were not originally part of the core, they were added
later.
Would it be of any value/interest to this discussion to bring up the
reason why it was added (when it was added)?
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Steffen wrote:
On 16/12/2006, at 23.47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The IEMGUIs were not originally part of the core, they were added later.
Would it be of any value/interest to this discussion to bring up the reason
why it was added (when it was added)?
As I
On Dec 15, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker].
What is [objectmaker]?
what's at the end of the receive-symbol
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 15, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have any actual objections?
Yes.
Are we supposed to guess what they are?
You could guess using mail archives what I think about
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Plans Casal David wrote:
Separation of Concerns:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns
Separation of language, content, and presentation has to be a good
On 14 Dec 2006, at 18:18, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I propose moving the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into
the extra folder, compiled as individual files.
What's the advantage of doing that?
Separation of Concerns:
padawan12 wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:52:07 +0100
IOhannes m zmölnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am a string advocate
Me too,
;-)
but those damn symbols can't contain whitespace
?? says who ??
mf.adsr
IOhannes
___
PD-dev mailing list
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:52 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five
years, I say no, we don't need this to happen.
It wasn't a question of need. We are all fed ;). Do you have any
actual objections?
well, i
If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an essential
step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any #imports. Only the
bare minimum is
in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is still a configure-time option, which means,
On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:54 PM, carmen wrote:
If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an
essential step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any
#imports. Only the bare minimum is
in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker].
What is [objectmaker]?
what's at the end of the receive-symbol of the same name, that thing that
creates all your
In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language, I propose moving
the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into the extra folder,
compiled as individual files. The only changes needed to make this
happen is to rename and move the relevant g_*.c files to extra,
renaming the setup()
Anything that adds modularity and allows separate
compilation has to be a good thing. It seems
a logical partition to make too, graphical things
should probably have their own space.
2c
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:26:32 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a first step
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language,
I'd like to distinguish between micro-language and micro-environment. Pd
is already a micro-language in the sense that it has a micro-syntax: a
syntax that is very simple, and that
14 matches
Mail list logo
