On 16/12/2006, at 23.47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The IEMGUIs were not originally part of the core, they were added
later.
Would it be of any value/interest to this discussion to bring up the
reason why it was added (when it was added)?
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006, Steffen wrote:
On 16/12/2006, at 23.47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The IEMGUIs were not originally part of the core, they were added later.
Would it be of any value/interest to this discussion to bring up the reason
why it was added (when it was added)?
As I
On Dec 15, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker].
What is [objectmaker]?
what's at the end of the receive-symbol
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 15, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have any actual objections?
Yes.
Are we supposed to guess what they are?
You could guess using mail archives what I think about
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Plans Casal David wrote:
Separation of Concerns:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_concerns
Separation of language, content, and presentation has to be a good
On 14 Dec 2006, at 18:18, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I propose moving the IEM GUI objects that are embedded in Pd into
the extra folder, compiled as individual files.
What's the advantage of doing that?
Separation of Concerns:
padawan12 wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:52:07 +0100
IOhannes m zmölnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am a string advocate
Me too,
;-)
but those damn symbols can't contain whitespace
?? says who ??
mf.adsr
IOhannes
___
PD-dev mailing list
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:52 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five
years, I say no, we don't need this to happen.
It wasn't a question of need. We are all fed ;). Do you have any
actual objections?
well, i
If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an essential
step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any #imports. Only the
bare minimum is
in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is still a configure-time option, which means,
On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:54 PM, carmen wrote:
If we are going to have full-fledged namespaces, than this is an
essential step. Think C without any #includes or Java without any
#imports. Only the bare minimum is
in the language itself. Everything else is a library.
in Python 2.5, Tk is
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker].
What is [objectmaker]?
what's at the end of the receive-symbol of the same name, that thing that
creates all your
Anything that adds modularity and allows separate
compilation has to be a good thing. It seems
a logical partition to make too, graphical things
should probably have their own space.
2c
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:26:32 -0500
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a first step
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
In a first step towards making Pd a micro-language,
I'd like to distinguish between micro-language and micro-environment. Pd
is already a micro-language in the sense that it has a micro-syntax: a
syntax that is very simple, and that
13 matches
Mail list logo
