-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-20 22:26, m.e.grimm wrote:
hey jaime,
i did a quick compile the other day and just ended up with binaries
that got the wrong architecture warning in 43.1 extended
that's all I've done though.
the extended autobuilds on 10.7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-18 19:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
You could combine [sendcanvas] and [receivecanvas] into [thiscanvas] with an
inlet for the receive and an outlet for the send.
you could even do this as an abstraction.
fgmasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-18 21:34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Yes the depth should be settable, that should be possible to add, not a lot
of work.
it probably should be settable.
however, i never encountered a real need for that, that's why it's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-18 21:44, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
work. Which differentiates between list and bang?
canvasargs I think.
has that ever created a problem for you, or is your complaint purely
academic?
would it help you, if there was a [set( message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-18 18:49, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
But if you want dynamic naming, there's [receives] with an s, which
there's also zexy's [multireceive] which does probably the same (though
i agree that [receives] is a very nice name)
truct.
I think
Once again, a tiny reminder,
that tomorrow, november 22nd at 19°° there will be a patching circle held
at ESC im Labor, 2nd Floor (aka CC).
Apart from getting together and share ideas, work on patches within pd
or related software, there will be a short presentation by Matthias Kronlachner,
Hello,
tomorrow, 22nd November, will be the next meeting of Pure Data users
in Berlin at NK, as usual - Elsenstr. 52, 2HH 2Etage.
For more information, look up
http://puredata.info/**community/organization/pd-**
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-18 19:43, Miller Puckette wrote:
I'm with Hans -- e.g., 'list' where there's a whole slew of functionalities
masquerading as a single class (and sharing a help file), but in which
you only need one object for each type of use, e.g., list
Dear PD-List
I recently decided to get into gesture recognition for several different
performance-art purposes. one of them is for fireshows, where i would like
to be able to control events on my computer throug the circling movements
of torches.
another one needs to be able to recognize simple
Le 21/11/2011 15:22, Matthias Moos a écrit :
Dear PD-List
I recently decided to get into gesture recognition for several
different performance-art purposes. one of them is for fireshows,
where i would like to be able to control events on my computer throug
the circling movements of torches.
Hi,
I think Pedro Lopes was implementing a Dynamic Time Warping external, which
is a very common technique in pattern recognition... I don't know the state
of the project, but since he presented it in the last PD-Con it should be
in beta at least.
2011/11/21 Jack j...@rybn.org
**
Le
hello, there is something you can try on linux or osx, by sending events to
[x11mouse] and then easystroke
http://www.workinprogress.ca/gesture-recognition-in-pure-data-with-easystroke/
Colet Patrice
- Mail original -
De: Matthias Moos feuerb...@gmail.com
À: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
here is my crash
http://pastebin.com/gibjsVg3
do the binaries from http://gem.iem.at work?
yes they do!
it seems a few days ago I was getting this with just Gem. Now it seems
Gem/Pd-extended are fine...
this last crash report was from importing gridflow as well as gem.
ill send another
Hi all,
Indeed I have an DTW external, still need to find free time to get it there
for everyone (as a working external, and probably only for linux - not
enough free time!). Anyhow when I did my presentation at this year's pdcon,
I did show easystroke as an example.
Easystroke is absolutely
i bite my tongue
crash report after importing Gem only. crash happens when closing
example (curve3d) window:
http://pastebin.com/s4r5uUeJ
m
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:36 AM, m.e.grimm megr...@gmail.com wrote:
here is my crash
http://pastebin.com/gibjsVg3
do the binaries from
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:07 AM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:
From: IOhannes zm?lnig zmoel...@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] Troubles running Pd-0.43.1test5 on Windows XP
On 11/18/2011 04:07 PM, rolf meesters wrote:
trying to install on XP Pro,
following the 'new' method from the install.txt.
Yes, the work of Pedro seems very promising, I don't know what's the
current state, it seems he's been quite busy recently.
However, you might want to check the Pd porting of Open CV, it's pretty
rich and works like a charm on Linux (can't try on other systems).
Le 2011-11-21 à 09:56:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2011-11-18 18:49, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
But if you want dynamic naming, there's [receives] with an s, which
there's also zexy's [multireceive] which does probably the same (though
i agree that [receives] is a very nice name)
Le 2011-11-21 à 12:58:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
while i'm all for one objectclass per functionality, and for
establishing a single idiom (at least, per objectclass family) - and
thus think i'm with hans also, i still don't see any point in
masquerading as a single class.
what makes the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-21 20:56, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Le 2011-11-21 à 09:56:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2011-11-18 18:49, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
But if you want dynamic naming, there's [receives] with an s, which
there's also zexy's
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
To: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] get method for Pd
Le 2011-11-21 à 12:58:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
while i'm all for one
Le 2011-11-21 à 12:35:00, Jonathan Wilkes a écrit :
Yeahreallythey'rebothequallyclearespeciallyformusicianswhoaren'tprogrammers.
Justlikereadingamusicscore--whitespacedoesn'taffectreadabilitythatmuch.
Le 2011-11-21 à 21:12:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2011-11-21 20:56, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
at all, whereas [receives] has http://gridflow.ca/help/receives-help.html
after having a look, i see that [receives] is not such a good name as i
initially thought.
Hahaha !
And don't care
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-21 21:35, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
what makes the name [list foo] any better than [listfoo]?
Yeahreallythey'rebothequallyclearespeciallyformusicianswhoaren'tprogrammers.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-21 22:04, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Le 2011-11-21 à 21:12:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2011-11-21 20:56, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
at all, whereas [receives] has
http://gridflow.ca/help/receives-help.html
after having a look, i
On Monday, November 21, 2011 3:02 PM, Mathieu Bouchard
ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
Le 2011-11-21 à 12:58:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
while i'm all for one objectclass per functionality, and for
establishing a single idiom (at least, per objectclass family) - and
thus think i'm with
Le 2011-11-21 à 22:09:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
and i argue that it's a bad idea to introduce whitespace as namespace
delimiter in a language that already uses whitespace as token/atom
separator.
It's good if you want to implement the new functionality as one big class
while
- Original Message -
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca; pd-list@iem.at pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] get method for Pd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Le 2011-11-21 à 22:15:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
however, i think that the prefix functionality of [receives] (which is
very present, being the 1st argument) is a bit confusing in this
context. for me, the name [receives] would be great, if you could use it
without having to the prefix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-11-21 23:05, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
i don't know. my native language allows construction of compound words,
and while this seems ridiculous to many english speakers, it's not that
it makes a lot of problems in real world.
English
Le 2011-11-21 à 23:33:00, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
On 2011-11-21 23:05, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
English speakers don't live in the real world?
english speakers usually don't encounter these compound words since
they (the words) are not used in their (the people's) everyday life.
«
hi all i got fux_kinect working on my ubuntu 10.04
i updated repo on https://github.com/badgeek/fux_kinect/
make sure to edit pd path directory on Makefile before compiling
screenshot:
http://i.imgur.com/vSUTh.png
cheers
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Matthias Kronlachner
32 matches
Mail list logo
