@bernardo. you should compare also how many employees does red hat have and
canonical. and also red hat wasnt always the saint you think. people like
ubuntu because are tired to config things everytime. so even if they
contribute less i dont care. its open source. the code is there
Em 2010/09/14
That validates my statement to: do not have the latest version :) Do you
win anything in using Lucid versus Karmic? Karmic has rt, it works like a
charm, I can put jack with a latency of 9ms with H4 audio as USB audio card
(no drivers no install) and no xruns - running nicely. If I do not use -rt
Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time, I
dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed the 32
bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for 10.04
available?
And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices? And what about
distros?
Ubuntu can use xfce (Xubuntu by default or *apt*-*get install xfce4, **anyway
its always up to you :)*
**Personally, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with pd-extended, but due to
isues with some 64b stuff (firewire drivers and video tracking software) I
tend to use Ubuntu 32b. I have kde, xfce and
2010/9/13 Pedro Lopes pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt:
Ubuntu can use xfce (Xubuntu by default or apt-get install xfce4, anyway its
always up to you :)
Personally, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with pd-extended, but due to isues
with some 64b stuff (firewire drivers and video tracking software) I tend
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones juan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last time, I
dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed the 32
bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for 10.04
available?
And
I prefer KDE for desktop everyday usage. When I need more performance
I use OpenBox.
It is really minimal and customizable with an clean autostart script
where you can tell what you want.
I don't really like Xcfe because it compromises the desktop and it is
not as minimal as OpenBox.
It is good
Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try.
2010/9/13 András Murányi muran...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones juan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family
I like it
2010/9/13 András Murányi muran...@gmail.com:
Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right?
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try.
Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country
sometimes... :o)
I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA have
these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc...
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the
Then you have to add Fusion free+non-free (maybe livna?) to your repos.
2010/9/13 András Murányi muran...@gmail.com:
Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country
sometimes... :o)
I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA have
these? Like some
Ahh, livna
You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to Ubuntu,
what do I tall them when i go back? :o)
I'll take a look at it, and also at home-brewing a kernel. Maybe that's the
way forward.
Thanks,
Andras
2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros bernardobarr...@gmail.com
Then
Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64
bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?)
Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with rt [1]
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes
2010/9/13 András Murányi
The Debian tools make it quite easy and manageable to build your own
kernel. Try that before switching :)
.hc
On Sep 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, András Murányi wrote:
Ahh, livna
You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to
Ubuntu, what do I tall them when i go
just curious... why switch from fedora to ubuntu?
2010/9/13 Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at:
The Debian tools make it quite easy and manageable to build your own kernel.
Try that before switching :)
.hc
On Sep 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, András Murányi wrote:
Ahh, livna
You know,
Media apps seem to be much better supported in Debian/Ubuntu than in
Fedora. That's my two bits.
.hc
On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
just curious... why switch from fedora to ubuntu?
2010/9/13 Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at:
The Debian tools make it quite
Nope. It's gone.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1388451
Andras
2010/9/13 Pedro Lopes pedro.lo...@ist.utl.pt
Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64
bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?)
Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu
Well, i never really used Fedora... I used RH back then, and when i was to
get back to Linux after XP, I have evaluated many distros, and Ubuntu seemed
kinda promising. Why did it seem promising to me?
- large user base
- entirely non-for-profit
- targeted the desktop more definitely than some
come'on, I hate brown... :-)
One thing is that Canonical do much much less to Linux kernel
development then RedHat. They don't give back :-(
2010/9/13 András Murányi muran...@gmail.com:
Well, i never really used Fedora... I used RH back then, and when i was to
get back to Linux after XP, I
Canonical does do a lot of GNOME development tho, from what I've
heard. They do contribute a lot of code, but in different areas. But
it would be interesting to see how the various GNU/Linux companies
compare in terms of how much code they contribute.
.hc
On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:54 PM,
I think RedHat, Novell, IBM, Google are some of the institutions that
send more patches to the kernel.
There are a lot of independent and anonymous guys too. Maybe people at
University? I don't know.
BUT Canonical are not one of those companies. Maybe for GNOME. But I
think the most exciting
21 matches
Mail list logo
