Hi Ingo
Thanks for testing!
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 05:23 +0200, Ingo wrote:
Hi Roman,
the new version works great!
I'm glad to hear that.
I made myself some testing objects around it.
Maybe that could be useful if you guys ever get around fixing the help
patch.
I'll have a look.
The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I
wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies as low as possible. I
think this was the original idea of the rewrite, right?
Anyway what can be done is add a simple offset number like I did it
somewhere on my testing patch.
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
To: adam sanches adam.sanc...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] Selecting random wavefile from folder without knowing the
names
Le 2011-09-14 à 22:14:00, adam
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote:
The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I
wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies as low as possible. I
think this was the original idea of the rewrite, right?
Yeah, exactly. I would like to be able to
Interesting. How did you quantify the amount of message transfers? What
makes it differ so much, like you say?
I simply (roughly) counted the numbers of objects the calculation including
all sub processes have to pass until you get the final result.
(Unfortunately I cannot tell how heavy each
Hi
if you're running on Linux check the [ADDITIONAL-INFOS] in the arduino-help.pd on the upper right corner in the
pd-rewrite: https://github.com/reduzent/pduino
as mentioned below the infos you'll find there are basically from
http://answers.ros.org/answers/101/revisions/
with this method
I just tried to open the help file on Windows XP and Natty and it crashes Pd
on both platforms.
Ingo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-boun...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von
olsen
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. September 2011 14:52
An: tim vets
Cc: pd-list
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote:
The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I
wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies as low as possible. I
think this was the original idea of the
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Ingo wrote:
Interesting. How did you quantify the amount of message transfers? What
makes it differ so much, like you say?
I simply (roughly) counted the numbers of objects the calculation including
all sub processes have to pass until you get the final
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote:
The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is that I
wanted to keep the number of files and dependencies
Hi Hans,
unfortunately I am not really good at C or C++ so I have to stick with
simplifying within Pd until I get there. But I am actually working on it so
I'll be able to replace certain objects in my patches by more efficient
externals. Anyway, I think in the case of simplifying the pduino
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:43 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:36 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 09:44 +0200, Ingo wrote:
The reason why I didn't make an abstraction for the debyte is
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:54 +0200, Ingo wrote:
Hi Hans,
unfortunately I am not really good at C or C++ so I have to stick with
simplifying within Pd until I get there. But I am actually working on it so
I'll be able to replace certain objects in my patches by more efficient
externals.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:29 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 18:54 +0200, Ingo wrote:
Hi Hans,
unfortunately I am not really good at C or C++ so I have to stick with
simplifying within Pd until I get there. But I am actually working on it so
I'll be able to
This looks very thorough and useful. It would be great to have in the
http://puredata.info/docs section (once the website is back up).
.hc
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:16 +0200, abel.jer...@free.fr wrote:
Hi all,
My last mail was broken by the mailing list engine.
The prose in a file if
Le 2011-09-15 à 15:45:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:28 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Stephen Lavelle wrote:
4 - is there a shortcut for deleting connections? something like ctrl+click
would save me a lot of time.
BTW, if you select a set
The [change -1] is a great idea, I just committed that to bytemask.pd
and debytemask.pd. But the [pd resolve-bits_0-7] abstractions seem
quite labor-intensive, but they work. I think it would work better to
use multiple instances of [debytemask].
.hc
Not sure what you mean by
17 matches
Mail list logo
