yeah for sure.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 02:12 +0900, hard off wrote:
> this thread is brought to you by the letter [$0] and the word [kludge]
>
>
> (i promise no more jokes for the next few weeks. my pd tracker is
> starting to make sounds, so i have some drumloops to cut.)
i am very ok with your jokes :-)
bt
this thread is brought to you by the letter [$0] and the word [kludge]
(i promise no more jokes for the next few weeks. my pd tracker is
starting to make sounds, so i have some drumloops to cut.)
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and accoun
Yes, you are correct that I was using it to speed normal patching, in
this case I was generating patch-matrix toggle elements in a grid that
communicated with a matrix object via $0 (the details of that are
discussed in a previous thread of mine). I was cut-and-pasting them
to other patches, so t
On 08/02/2007, at 14.45, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 14:21 +0100, Steffen wrote:
On 08/02/2007, at 13.35, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
[...] as far as
i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
litteral
Hallo,
Steffen hat gesagt: // Steffen wrote:
> On 08/02/2007, at 13.35, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> >Hallo,
> >Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >
> >>[...] as far as
> >>i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
> >>litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 14:21 +0100, Steffen wrote:
> On 08/02/2007, at 13.35, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > Hallo,
> > Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >
> >> [...] as far as
> >> i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
> >> litteral '$0's as abstraction a
On 08/02/2007, at 13.35, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
[...] as far as
i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require
litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments, would be, if you would use
dynamic patching just as a quicker way
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:35 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction
> > argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the
> > same? if i am not totally
Hallo,
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
> anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction
> argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the
> same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you
> plan to save the pat
Roman Haefeli a écrit :
hi luke
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 00:16 -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to puredata.org or
something for posterity. Or a bug report since it's obviously a
kludge.
a kludge? why?
anyway, why do you want to have a
Hallo,
Alexandre Quessy hat gesagt: // Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> Yes. Either use [f $0], or a [makefilename %s-%s] or [makesymbol
> %s-%s] with a [f $0] as argument. I think that [makesymbol] is
> supposed to be deprecated, but I prefer its behaviour to the one of
> [makefilename], and its name is
hi luke
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 00:16 -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
> Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to puredata.org or
> something for posterity. Or a bug report since it's obviously a
> kludge.
a kludge? why?
anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstractio
Luke Iannini (pd) a écrit :
Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate
my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ).
Alexandre, not sure what you're suggesting either since [f $0] would
output the "value" of $0 rather than the actual characters "$0"
hello,
Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate
my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ).
Alexandre, not sure what you're suggesting either since [f $0] would
output the "value" of $0 rather than the actual characters "$0", which
is what I'm after.
Either way
Hahaha : ).
It was generating odd messages here, like [test $-7614554]. But I'm
on an intel mac using Pd-Extended autobuilds, so that's probably
normal.
Yes, I think a character escaping mechanism would be a good thing,
though of course escaping is already used in the pd-fileformat so who
knows
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:16:02AM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
> Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate
> my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ).
It was supposed to solve your problem.
> Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to pureda
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 07:54:40PM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
> I'm trying to generate objects within a subpatch using [obj( messages,
> and I want those generated objects to have $0 as one of their
> arguments, e.g. [myobject $0]. Using [obj x y myobject $0( gives
> [myobject 0] (I know $0 i
Yes. Either use [f $0], or a [makefilename %s-%s] or [makesymbol
%s-%s] with a [f $0] as argument. I think that [makesymbol] is
supposed to be deprecated, but I prefer its behaviour to the one of
[makefilename], and its name is clearer.
--
Alexandre Quessy
http://alexandre.quessy.net
2007/2/7,
I'm trying to generate objects within a subpatch using [obj( messages,
and I want those generated objects to have $0 as one of their
arguments, e.g. [myobject $0]. Using [obj x y myobject $0( gives
[myobject 0] (I know $0 is not for messages, just thought I'd give
that a try), and of course [list
20 matches
Mail list logo
