On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, josepadovani wrote:
On the next PdCon we should have sessions for physics related papers,
presentations and performances (without cars!)... ;)
It would require that people submit physics-related papers in the first
place...
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:00:09PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Instantaneousness is a myth. It does not exist in nature.
I thought that at the moment it looks quite a lot like the collapse of a wave
function of an electron being measured is instantaneous.
Heisenberg is driving along in his
Chris McCormick escreveu:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:00:09PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Instantaneousness is a myth. It does not exist in nature.
I thought that at the moment it looks quite a lot like the collapse of a wave
function of an electron being measured is instantaneous.
Can't be smaller than one unit of Plank time, about
10e-44s, because any machine capable of measuring
it would require all the mass/energy in the universe.
(so a fat bloke down the pub told me)
So, basically the universe is band limited.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:04:22 +0100
Chris McCormick
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:00:09PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Instantaneousness is a myth. It does not exist in nature.
I thought that at the moment it looks quite a lot like the collapse of a wave
function of an electron being measured is
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, josepadovani wrote:
On the next PdCon we should have sessions for physics related papers,
presentations and performances (without cars!)... ;)
It would require that people submit physics-related papers in the first
place... but it would have to be physics-with-pd, for
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Derek Holzer wrote:
As I said already, I'm not interested in predictability. Analog
nonlinearity is interesting to me, much more so than digital
pseudo-randomness.
I wonder what you mean by nonlinearity... it seems that there are wholly
different definitions of it.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Derek Holzer wrote:
I can't really say from a supra-atomic standpoint I could agree with
you, but I'd settle for the speed of light,
Oh yes, the speed of light (in vacuum) is quite exactly the maximum
propagation speed.
Which is quite a bit faster than your average
Hi Jerome,
as you probably discovered, you need to use a send~/receive~ pair or
other type of one-block delay to make any kind of feedback in Pd to
avoid the dreaded DSP loop detected error. Filters, delays,
waveshapers and other things can affect the signal along the way.
But to be honest,
Hey Guys, sti
For artistic inspiration, I would highly recommend Kevin Drumm's
Imperial Distortion CD, which was composed using very simple
filter/EQ
feedback loops. Raphael Toral's Aeriola Frequency and Cyclorama
Lift
3 CDs also use a no input technique of delays and equalizers, as do
all
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Derek Holzer wrote:
as you probably discovered, you need to use a send~/receive~ pair or
other type of one-block delay to make any kind of feedback in Pd
You don't need it to be one block...?
For one, feedback in the digital realm is never instantaneous,
As I said already, I'm not interested in predictability. Analog
nonlinearity is interesting to me, much more so than digital
pseudo-randomness. But my main interest is in being able to maintain a
live performance in the midst of all this unpredictability. When digital
stuff fails, it tends to
I can't really say from a supra-atomic standpoint I could agree with
you, but I'd settle for the speed of light, or even the remotely distant
figure of the response time of an op-amp. Which is quite a bit faster
than your average blocksize or even a single discrete sample--assuming
that a
Of course, feedback does not require simultaneity...nor does it always
imply an acoustic system (though I'm guessing that's what you're
referring to, Derek). One nice thing about those digital goblins is
that they can feed-back *information* about the music. More
interestingly, they can
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, Jerome Covington wrote:
I'm interested to know who's been working with feedback, and if anyone
has any patches they've developed, or that others have developed that
they think is exemplary.
Feedback is everywhere and is everything. The universe is made of feedback
loops.
Mathieu Bouchard escreveu:
Feedback is everywhere and is everything. The universe is made of
feedback loops. Those feedback loops are made of smaller feedback
loops and are constituents of bigger feedback loops.
hmmm...
;)
--
http://zepadovani.info
Jerome Covington wrote:
I'm interested to know who's been working with feedback, and if anyone
has any patches they've developed, or that others have developed that
they think is exemplary.
#N canvas 70 40 513 492 10;
#X obj 315 92 samplerate~;
#X obj 315 113 /;
#X obj 315 72 t b f;
#X
what kind of feedback???
Andrés Ferrari G.
http://www.myspace.com/anfex
¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web!
Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8.
http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1
I'm interested to know who's been working with feedback, and if anyone
has any patches they've developed, or that others have developed that
they think is exemplary.
--
Regards,
Jerome Covington
. . . . : . . . . :
define audio development
19 matches
Mail list logo
