Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

ote: > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 10:56:20 +0200 > From: IOhannes m zm?lnig mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>> > To: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> > Subject: Re: [PD] Binaural w32? > Message-ID: <1eb87617-397d-644c-59e7-adbf6b0b8...@iem.at >

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

On 6/7/21 20:03, João Pais wrote: if the only difference is the darwin file, would it be possible to send it here? (someone I know wanted to try it, but he can't learn how to install/try out externals) wow. i thought it is much easier for people to install things via deken than to manually

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

earplug-0.3.0-macos-universal-64-arm-intel.zip > On Jun 7, 2021, at 8:03 PM, João Pais wrote: > > >>> I see that the version in deken is for all OSs except Mac, is that correct? >>> Is a mac

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

I see that the version in deken is for all OSs except Mac, is that correct? Is a mac (64+32b) binary available, or it's already there, only deken doesn't know about it? Lucas made a build for Linux and Windows. There isn't a build for macOS yet and we just need someone to upload one. if

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

> On Jun 7, 2021, at 9:33 AM, João Pais wrote: > > Great, thanks. A first tryout seems to work with no issues (and sounds better > than the previous version which was highly filtered). Cool. > I see that the version in deken is for all OSs except Mac, is that correct? > Is a mac (64+32b)

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

Great, thanks. A first tryout seems to work with no issues (and sounds better than the previous version which was highly filtered). I see that the version in deken is for all OSs except Mac, is that correct? Is a mac (64+32b) binary available, or it's already there, only deken doesn't know

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

t mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> Subject: Re: [PD] Binaural w32? Message-ID: <3ffaeb84-291c-7e2e-981e-a1ca531f6...@gmail.com <mailto:3ffaeb84-291c-7e2e-981e-a1ca531f6...@gmail.com>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed that is nice - alth

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

On 06.06.2021 12:24, João Pais wrote: 1st order with 4 channels seems to already provide stereo spacialization Sure, but higher ambisonics orders give more accuracy. I'll try out. there are at least 6 sources to spatialize, which means 6x enconding+decoding plugins adding to the patch. I'm

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

1st order with 4 channels seems to already provide stereo spacialization Sure, but higher ambisonics orders give more accuracy. I'll try out. there are at least 6 sources to spatialize, which means 6x enconding+decoding plugins adding to the patch. I'm assuming these aren't the heaviest

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

> >> On Jun 2, 2021, at 3:56 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at >> <mailto:pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at> wrote: >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:33:11 +0100 >> From: Jo?o Pais mailto:jmmmp...@gmail.com>> >> Cc: Pd-List mailto:pd-list@lis

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

1st order with 4 channels seems to already provide stereo spacialization Sure, but higher ambisonics orders give more accuracy. (I just want to turn a stereo signal into stereo binaural). I guess you also want to spatialize the signal in some way? There is no benefit in just "converting" a

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

> now Pd (win32) always crashes when opening BinauralDecoder and dsp on This is a known bug with BinauralDecoder: it crashes in the process method if you provide less than 4 input channels (= 1st order). I *think* they have fixed this already. Maybe you are using an older version? no, I

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

Hi, > now Pd (win32) always crashes when opening BinauralDecoder and dsp on This is a known bug with BinauralDecoder: it crashes in the process method if you provide less than 4 input channels (= 1st order). I *think* they have fixed this already. Maybe you are using an older version?

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

strangely, now Pd (win32) always crashes when opening BinauralDecoder and dsp on - independently if the other vstplugin is being used. That wasn't the case yesterday, I'm loading it exactly in the same way, with the same configuration. I'm having a look, but I'm apparently not getting

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

Am 5. Juni 2021 01:06:08 MESZ schrieb "João Pais" : >I'm having a look, but I'm apparently not getting something. When I try > >[vstplugin~] + "StereoEncoder", it only outputs a signal to the >left-ish, changing the position doesn't affect the output )0th order). this sounds very much as if

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

I'm having a look, but I'm apparently not getting something. When I try [vstplugin~] + "StereoEncoder", it only outputs a signal to the left-ish, changing the position doesn't affect the output )0th order). Or do you put a [vstplugin~] + "BinauralDecoder" afterwards? Personally, I always use

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

Personally, I always use [vstplugin~] + "StereoEncoder" / "BinauralDecoder" from the IEM plugin suite, but I'm of course biased :-) On 01.06.2021 15:12, João Pais wrote: Hi list, what is the current state of the art in binaural externals? I see in the archives that there are several around,

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

d, 2 Jun 2021 13:33:11 +0100 > From: Jo?o Pais mailto:jmmmp...@gmail.com>> > Cc: Pd-List mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > Subject: Re: [PD] Binaural w32? > Message-ID: <3ffaeb84-291c-7e2e-981e-a1ca531f6...@gmail.com > <mailto:3ffaeb84-291c-7e2e-981e-a1ca531f6...

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

that is nice - although I can't really build anything in windows on my own. what are the improvements compared to the 2009 version? I updated the earplug~ external to build using pd-lin-builder, so it should be easy to build on Windows: https://github.com/pd-externals/earplug/tree/main

Re: [PD] Binaural w32?

021 14:12:23 +0100 > From: Jo?o Pais mailto:jmmmp...@gmail.com>> > To: PD-List mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > Subject: [PD] Binaural w32? > Message-ID: <mailto:ef02d682-c394-1622-2787-a7de210f1...@gmail.com>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; form

[PD] Binaural w32?

Hi list, what is the current state of the art in binaural externals? I see in the archives that there are several around, each with advantages/disadvantages. I would need it to: - windows 32b - record the output of an already existing patch with x-y coordinates/trajectories into binaural