hi,
pix_multiblob algorithm changes just after the 0.93.3 release in november
2011
Ricardo Fabbri made those changes so maybe he is the best person to help us
figuring out where the bug is, if this is really a bug
since the algorithm changed I'm not so surprised that the same patch with
the same
OK, my apologies to IOhannes for the rant, I was in the understanding that this
is how the object works now.
Now that it's clarified that this is a bug, not a feature. It should be
evaluated why it behaves differently and if it is worth it to keep the changes
or we can go back to the original.
IOhannes just confirmed that the pix_multiblob code has changed and thus broke
the patch. Since i don't have the git version compiled I can't test here.
So that is a confirmed Gem problem. I don't see the point to work with that
object any more, now that I know that the new version breaks
On 06/15/13 16:03, Max wrote:
So that is a confirmed Gem problem. I don't see the point to work with that
object any more, now that I know that the new version breaks backward
compatibility. I want to be able to make a patch that works with whatever gem
version : (
i think that' a bitter
hi,
it works on my machine (Ubuntu 64bit) with pd 0.44-extended-20130528 (Gem
93.3)
and I can also confirm it works with latest pd vanilla and Gem 0.93.3
and it doesn't with the latest Gem from Git but I don't know why yet...
+
a
--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
2013/6/6 Max
Bonjour Antoine et merci beacuoup.
Thanks a lot for testing this. A change in behavior between Gem release and git
is probably not intended, so that's where I hope IOhannes can have a look into.
max
Am 10.06.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Antoine Villeret antoine.ville...@gmail.com:
hi,
it works
Le 05/06/2013 22:17, Max a écrit :
wow, this looks so wrong! (your screenshot)
I have no idea why this is.
I just tried it under Linux mint 15 (through ssh- XY from os x)
Pd 0.43.2
GEM: ver: 0.93.3
GEM: compiled: Sep 6 2012
and it works perfectly there.
on my other machine, os x
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:18 +0200, Jack wrote:
Le 05/06/2013 22:17, Max a écrit :
wow, this looks so wrong! (your screenshot)
I have no idea why this is.
I just tried it under Linux mint 15 (through ssh- XY from os x)
Pd 0.43.2
GEM: ver: 0.93.3
GEM: compiled: Sep 6 2012
and
Am 06.06.2013 um 18:33 schrieb Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com:
I have the same results than Antoine.
A screenshot is attached.
Configuration :
Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713.
Just an uneducated guess: Could it be that this is caused by objects
being positioned on the
Am 06.06.2013 um 18:18 schrieb Jack j...@rybn.org:
Hello Max,
I have the same results than Antoine.
A screenshot is attached.
Configuration :
Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713.
I just tested it with another machine
Windows Pd-ext 0.43 / Gem 0.92
Windows Pd-ext 0.44 / Gem
wow, this looks so wrong! (your screenshot)
I have no idea why this is.
I just tried it under Linux mint 15 (through ssh- XY from os x)
Pd 0.43.2
GEM: ver: 0.93.3
GEM: compiled: Sep 6 2012
and it works perfectly there.
on my other machine, os x
0.44.0-extended-20130213
GEM: ver: 0.93.3
GEM:
Am 30.05.2013 um 14:06 schrieb Antoine Villeret antoine.ville...@gmail.com:
hi,
I'm sorry it still doesn't work
and I can't find values that works well on the testbed.mov video...
I don't know why, tell me if you want more info or snapshots
Did you download all of the files, especially
hi,
I'm sorry it still doesn't work
and I can't find values that works well on the testbed.mov video...
I don't know why, tell me if you want more info or snapshots
cheers
a
--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
2013/5/28 Max abonneme...@revolwear.com
Am 27.05.2013 um 20:09
Am 27.05.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Antoine Villeret antoine.ville...@gmail.com:
I have a strange behavior here, some cross appear in the middle of nowhere...
but the blobs are keeping their ID well
could you try again? I just changed the values of the settings.
Le 27/05/2013 04:10, Max a écrit :
Am 27.05.2013 um 02:57 schrieb Jack j...@rybn.org:
Le 27/05/2013 02:32, Max a écrit :
Am 27.05.2013 um 02:24 schrieb Jack j...@rybn.org:
Le 27/05/2013 01:26, Max a écrit :
Am 27.05.2013 um 01:00 schrieb Jack j...@rybn.org:
Le 26/05/2013 20:56, Max a écrit
Am 27.05.2013 um 20:09 schrieb Antoine Villeret antoine.ville...@gmail.com:
hi all,
thanks Max for sharing your (very good) work !
thanks, but the kudos should go to Jakob for that.
I have a strange behavior here, some cross appear in the middle of nowhere...
but the blobs are keeping
16 matches
Mail list logo